Court awards former judge $640,000 in same-sex wedding dispute
A Texas judge who was disciplined for recusing herself from performing same-sex marriages has won a $640,000 lawsuit. McLennan County Justice of the Peace Dianne Hensley, who’s […]

Courtroom No. 2B in the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Courthouse in Wilmington, Delaware, will take center stage Wednesday, with attorneys for Rep. LaMonica McIver scheduled to appear before a U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals panel there in a bid to get her federal assault charges thrown out.The court hearing comes nearly 14 months after a confrontation outside Newark migrant jail Delaney Hall earned McIver national notoriety and landed her in the Trump administration’s crosshairs.Federal officials have compared McIver, a first-term Democrat from Newark, to “Antifa-aligned left-wing violent extremists.” She and her allies argue she is a political target, prosecuted because she vocally opposes the Trump administration’s mass detention and deportation policies.“They want to criminalize oversight and lock me up. Whatever they try, we’re not backing down,” McIver said during a meeting of House Democrats in Newark last week.McIver, who is now expecting her second child, faces up to 17 years in prison.One of her close allies is Rep. Rob Menendez, a Jersey City Democrat who was with McIver at Delaney Hall last year when the melee broke out that resulted in her assault charges.In an interview ahead of Wednesday’s hearing, Menendez said he has major concerns about what precedent could be set in a case like McIver’s and hopes the appeals panel will toss the charges she faces.Rep. Rob Menendez speaks outside of Delaney Hall on Dec. 23, 2025. (Photo by Anne-Marie Caruso/New Jersey Monitor)He called the continuing legal battle a “complete abuse” of the U.S. Department of Justice that is “consistent with this administration’s abuse at every level of power.” But he said McIver remains optimistic and productive, noting her recent return visits to Delaney Hall to inspect the facility and speak to detainees housed there.“I think she’s hopeful, she’s feeling positive. We’re all here to support her as she continues to challenge this,” he said.A request for comment from McIver was not returned.McIver, Menendez, and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman were at Delaney Hall on May 9, 2025, to conduct an oversight visit shortly after private company Geo Group opened the detention center.During the visit, federal agents arrested Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who joined the congressional delegation and was invited into a fenced area of the property by a Geo Group staffer. Baraka, a Democrat who at the time had been trying to get city health inspectors inside the jail, remained in the parking lot for about 40 minutes before being asked to leave. Agents arrested him for trespassing on his way off the property, setting off a fracas between the elected officials, protesters, and federal agents.Body camera footage released later shows McIver shoving at least one officer during the chaotic scene.Video footage of a May 9, 2025, confrontation between protesters and federal agents outside a migrant jail in Newark shows Rep. LaMonica McIver (in red) pushing one of the agents. (Courtesy of the Department of Homeland Security)Ten days after that brawl, federal prosecutors announced they were dropping the trespassing charge against Baraka but hitting McIver with assault charges. A federal grand jury indicted her in June 2025.McIver’s legal team is seeking to dismiss the charges by arguing she has legislative immunity for the acts that occurred at Delaney Hall last year — the Constitution’s speech or debate clause protects members of Congress from prosecution over legislative acts — and by claiming she is the victim of selective and vindictive prosecution. Prosecutors argue that her actions during the fight that broke out during Baraka’s arrest were not legislative acts, and that the speech or debate clause “doesn’t immunize Members of Congress who engage in violent or forcefully obstructive acts, full stop.”McIver’s attorneys attempted to have the federal judge overseeing her case toss the charges, but he rejected her argument that she is shielded by legislative immunity and found that her alleged criminal conduct “did not occur during Defendant’s inspection of Delaney Hall,” setting up her appeal to be heard by the 3rd Circuit panel Wednesday. QuotationWe’re all here to support her as she continues to challenge this.– Rep. Rob MenendezIn a brief filed in the case in April, 20 former members of Congress — 17 of them Republicans — wrote that if the charges proceed, members of Congress would be deterred from carrying out their essential oversight responsibilities and “insulate executive abuses from the checks and balances the Constitution intends.”“Thus, it is no exaggeration to say that if this prosecution is allowed to proceed, it would imperil the constitutionally mandated powers of Congress and the fabric of our constitutional order,” they wrote.McIver has paid multiple visits to Delaney Hall since the incident that led to her assault charges, most recently last week, as the detention center has become a flashpoint in the fight against the Trump...
A Texas judge who was disciplined for recusing herself from performing same-sex marriages has won a $640,000 lawsuit. McLennan County Justice of the Peace Dianne Hensley, who’s […]
Today marks the fourth anniversary of President Trump’s hand-picked Supreme Court ending the federal right to abortion with the Dobbsv. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. Since then, more people have suffered and died because of restrictive anti-abortion laws, which have banned some or all abortion in 20 states. To mark the anniversary, Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, released the following statement: “Four years after President Trump’s handpicked Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion, their decision continues to devastate people across the country. With each passing day, more people are hurt, more families are broken, and more people’s lives are upended. Anti-abortion rights lawmakers continue to weaponize the Court’s decision to make it harder for everyone, everywhere to get the care they need. On this anniversary, it’s clearer than ever that it’s on all of us to fight back against an unpopular political agenda that has blocked people’s health, lives, and freedoms.”President Trump and his backers in Congress have spent their time in office making it harder for everyone, everywhere to get lifesaving reproductive health care, including abortion. Last July, they passed a law that “defunded” Planned Parenthood for one year by attempting to bar patients from using their Medicaid insurance at Planned Parenthood health centers. The harm they’ve caused is clear: Since the start of the Trump-Vance administration more than 50 Planned Parenthood health centers have been forced to close. More than 20 of those closures came after President Trump signed the law “defunding” Planned Parenthood.A Senate report examining the harm of “defunding” Planned Parenthood showed that in the six months since the “defunding” of Planned Parenthood took effect, fewer people have been able to get reproductive care at Planned Parenthood health centers in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024: The number of breast exam visits fell by 25% in Dec., increasing the risk of delayed breast cancer detection and avoidable, more serious illness.Visits for IUDs and other long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) dropped by 41% in Nov. and 36% in Dec.– the steepest decline across all services measured.STI testing declined by 11% in Nov. and 4% in Dec., limiting early diagnosis and treatment and increasing preventable spread and long-term health consequences.And there were 20% fewer visits for birth control pills in November. Now, House Republicans want to permanently “defund” Planned Parenthood because, where legal, Planned Parenthood health centers provide abortion.
A virulent anti-Trump critic did very poorly in the Democratic primary election for an open seat representing Manhattan, and the president didn't hold back his mockery.George Conway, ex-husband of former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, was a Republican political strategist before President Donald Trump won election in 2016. He has since become a fierce opponent of the president and even helped found the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump political organization.'This is a truly unattractive person, both inside and out. Have a nice life, George!'None of that helped Conway in the primary race for New York's 12th Congressional District, which had a crowded field of candidates that included a Kennedy scion."Wow, Mr. Kellyanne Conway, a Trump Deranged Loser at the highest level, is getting absolutely CRUSHED in the Primaries tonight," the president wrote in a post on Truth Social, referring to Conway's defunct marriage."He’ll end up at about 5% of the vote in a rather weak field of young and aggressive Communists," Trump added. "No wonder his 'husband' dumped him like a dog! This is a truly unattractive person, both inside and out. Have a nice life, George!"The Conway campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Kellyanne Conway was a Republican strategist who was Trump's campaign manager in 2016 and became a passionate supporter of his policies.Kellyanne Conway left the Trump campaign just a few months ahead of the 2020 election. The Conways announced their divorce in March 2023 after two decades of marriage. The primary election was called for New York state Assembly Member Micah Lasher, who garnered 39% of the vote with 87% of the ballots counted. Conway had gotten support from only 6% of the vote at that point.Jack Kennedy Schlossberg, 33, also performed poorly despite carrying the Kennedy name — he received only about 11% of the vote.RELATED: George Conway publicly chides Kellyanne Conway while she defends Trump Lasher is a longtime Democrat who promised to "revamp and recharge the Democratic Party in Washington" after his victory.He added that his goal was to show his party has "bold new ideas to improve the lives of struggling Americans and then deliver on them."Lasher will likely have an easy road to Congress, as two-thirds of the voters in the district are registered as Democrats.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Rep. LaMonica McIver's attorneys are set to appear before a U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals panel Wednesday morning in Wilmington, Delaware.Her legal team seeks to overturn her federal assault charges stemming from a May 2025 confrontation at Newark's Delaney Hall migrant detention facility, according to New Jersey Monitor's Sophie Nieto-Muñoz. Congresswoman McIver (D-NJ) and her allies contend she is a political target prosecuted for opposing the Trump administration's mass detention and deportation policies. The incident occurred during an oversight visit when federal agents arrested Newark's Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for trespassing. Body camera footage shows McIver shoving an officer during the resulting confrontation. McIver now faces up to 17 years in prison. “They want to criminalize oversight and lock me up. Whatever they try, we’re not backing down,” McIver said during a meeting of House Democrats in Newark last week.Her legal team argues she has legislative immunity under the Constitution's speech or debate clause and claims selective and vindictive prosecution. Prosecutors counter, claiming her actions were not legislative acts. Federal officials compared McIver to Antifa-aligned left-wing violent extremists, according to reports by The New Jersey Monitor.A federal judge previously rejected her immunity argument, prompting the appeal.Watch the video below. Your browser does not support the video tag.
Analysts were left stunned Wednesday morning after a trio of progressive congressional candidates backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani swept Tuesday’s Democratic primary elections in New York, many of whom drew comparisons to the late 2000s Tea Party movement that reshaped the Republican Party.“CLEAN SWEEP FOR ZOHRAN!!!” wrote progressive political commentator and former congressional candidate Krystal Ball in a social media post on X to her more than 625,000 followers. “It's a new day in the Dem party.”Democratic congressional candidates Claire Valdez, Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier all won their respective primary elections Tuesday, with two of them ousting their establishment Democratic opponents, and by significant margins. Their victory comes in spite of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) having “campaigned aggressively against Mamdani’s candidates.”“The Democratic Tea Party is here,” wrote Zachary Donnini, the head of data science at the news outlet VoteHub. “Tonight is shaping up to be one of the more consequential nights in recent Democratic politics, with Mamdani- and DSA-endorsed candidates reforming the party.”The Tea Party movement began in the late 2000s but fundamentally transformed the Republican Party during the 2010 midterms when a wave of far-right fiscal conservatives transformed the party and ousted multiple incumbents. Progressive Democrats have long hoped for their own party to undergo a similar transformation, and according to several journalists, that moment may have arrived on Tuesday.“The primary season is not over yet. And already, the number of Democratic socialists in Congress is set to double,” wrote Prem Thakker, a journalist with Zeteo. “Claire Valdez, Darializa Avila Chevalier, and Chris Rabb will join Bernie Sanders, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. And there may yet be more to come.”And MS NOW columnist Eric Michael Garcia, using a tongue-in-cheek reference to the “Star Wars” character “Yoda,” made the following quip: “Begun the Democratic Tea Party has.”The Democratic Tea Party is here. Tonight is shaping up to be one of the more consequential nights in recent Democratic politics, with Mamdani- and DSA-endorsed candidates reforming the party.— Zachary Donnini (@ZacharyDonnini) June 24, 2026
Darializa Avila Chevalier walked out of a radio interview after being pressed about controversial social media posts in her NY primary race.
1. Brown v. Board of Education, 1954This school desegregation decision was so important that Chief Justice Earl Warren made sure the judges were unanimous. And even with that, 20 or so years passed before it was actually enforced.2. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857A shameful decision not to extend citizenship to descendants of slaves by a shameful court that helped precipitate the Civil War. Let us note, however, that the vote was 7–2, so bravo to Benjamin Robbins Curtis and John McLean.3. Marbury v. Madison, 1803In which Chief Justice John Marshall established judicial review—giving the court the power to declare a congressional law unconstitutional. Would be lovely if we could undo this today.4. Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896The infamous “separate but equal” ruling. Homer Plessy was seven-eighths Caucasian and tried to sit in a white railway car. Not in Louisiana, bub!T-5. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2010A disgraceful ruling to all but undo campaign finance rules. Its impact on U.S. elections has been corrupting beyond our ability to count—quite literally, since one result of this decision is that we have no way of tracking how much corporations pour into campaigns.T-5. Roe v. Wade, 1973The landmark pro-abortion ruling. Interestingly, at first, the Jerry Falwells of this country weren’t up in arms about this one. Homeschooling was their big issue at the time.“This case … empowers Trump to violate as many laws as he wants without fear of the consequences. Immunity breeds impunity.”—author and columnist Jonathan Alter on Trump v. U.S.7. Trump v. United States, 2024The ruling that offered the president immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. One of the most annoying naïve-liberal guessing games of the Roberts court era: Maybe Gorsuch or Kavanaugh will save us here! No. They didn’t.8. Bush v. Gore, 2000The race to the right-wing gutter started here, with a decision so rancidly political—it settled a dispute over vote recounting—that the five majority justices noted it was “limited only to the present circumstances,” i.e., meant to install George W. Bush as president.T-9. McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819Unlike Marbury, this John Marshall ruling suits liberals today just fine: It declared the supremacy of federal over state law and would define the potential scope of the administrative state. Some conservatives would like to overturn it. At the rate we’re going, they won’t need to.T-9. Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015A rare victory for progress and decency in the modern era, thanks to Anthony Kennedy joining the court’s (then) four liberals to legalize same-sex marriage.T-11. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 2022Another Deep South case, and wham, nearly a half-century of pro-abortion rights precedent tossed out the window. Every justice who voted for this clearly lied about their beliefs at their confirmation hearings.T-11. West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish, 1937The famous case in which the anti–New Deal Supreme Court, perhaps brushed back by FDR’s court-packing scheme, shifted its right-wing gears and held that a minimum wage was constitutional. Justice Owen Roberts called it “the switch in time that saved nine.”T-11. Baker v. Carr, 1962One of three “one person, one vote” cases decided by the Warren court in the early 1960s. Warren, upon retiring, called these cases the most important of his tenure. One justice had a nervous breakdown during deliberations.T-14. Loving v. Virginia, 1967The court here held unanimously that the marriage between the appropriately named Richard Loving, a white man, and his Black wife, Mildred Jeter, could stand.T-14. Miranda v. Arizona, 1966The bane of cops from the day it was decided, it ensured that people under arrest were made aware of their rights. Kind of amazing it hasn’t been reversed yet.
When some politicians are inconvenienced by the Constitution, they may seek to change the court that interprets it. Packing the Supreme Court was once agreed to be a radical measure, one that threatens the sanctity of the institution as a politically impartial branch. For over 150 years, Congress has not altered the number of justices […]