arallaxNews.io
The Parallax Pulse
Refreshing...
LeftCenterRight
🔥 Top🕒 Latest
The Parallax Pulse
The Real Reason Thomas Massie Lost
The Atlantic
33 minutes ago

The Real Reason Thomas Massie Lost

He broke the one real rule of the MAGA Republican Party.

Center Left
Read →
Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Finds Its First Shady Applicant
The New Republic
4 hours ago

Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Finds Its First Shady Applicant

Donald Trump’s allies are racing to get a piece of his $1.8 billion slush fund.Michael Caputo served in the Trump administration during his first term as a campaign strategist and spokesperson at the Department of Health and Human Services, where he interfered with CDC findings on Covid. He is now seeking $2.7 million in damages from the government, claiming his life was upended after being investigated as part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe in 2016.“I was the target of the illegal Crossfire Hurricane investigation and our family suffered greatly during that dark era of political weaponization,” Caputo wrote in a letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche obtained by CNN. He claimed he was still under FBI investigation as recently as December 2025.“They found nothing; we lost everything,” he wrote.Caputo resided in Russia in the 1990s while an employee of the U.S. government. The Mueller report determined he had helped arrange a meeting between Roger Stone—Trump’s campaign manager and close associate—and a Russian agent, for the purpose of sharing information about Hillary Clinton.But who cares what FBI investigations say when your buddy is president? Now Caputo can get a huge chunk of taxpayer money because he thinks he was wronged by people Trump doesn’t like.Caputo is the first to publicly seek damages after the slush fund was created, but he won’t be the last.The Department of Justice has not said exactly who can profit off the fund, but hundreds of Trump allies—including January 6 rioters and members of Trump’s own super PAC—could theoretically get a piece of the pie.

Left
Read →
Republicans say Trump blew up Texas for 'his ego'
Alternet.org
11 hours ago

Republicans say Trump blew up Texas for 'his ego'

Former Bush Speechwriter David Frum and Republican strategist David Urban each took turns unloading on President Donald Trump for making Republicans’ difficult November fight even harder in ruby-red Texas and everywhere else.The punches came after Trump endorsed problematic Texas AG Ken Paxton over incumbent Texas Republican John Cornyn, who was assured an easy victory.“I think [Sen.] Lindsey Graham summed it up best,” Urban told CNN anchor Kaitlyn Collins. “It's going to cost three times as much now [to win that Texas seat]. That's what's really underpinning all this in a Texas race that Cornyn … was kind of a walk to win and beat [Democratic challenger James] Talarico. But Paxton — completely different story.”“I've seen some numbers where it's estimated the [National Republican Senatorial Committee] is going to have to spend an additional $250 million in Texas. That's not pocket change, when you got a race in Maine and a race in Alaska to help protect. Some of these races are going to be close. And if you have to spend 250 million bucks in Texas now to kind of prop up a guy who may not be the strongest candidate in a general election.”“I also think that if you look at the situation in May and project it forward to November, you're not understanding the dynamics of the American economy,” warned Frum. “This is a slowing economy. By November, it will be clear that Donald Trump lost the war in Iran. It will be clear that all Americans got out of it was higher gas prices, higher food prices, higher fuel prices. You're probably going to be in a very slow job creation situation by the second half of the year and continuing high rising prices.”“So, the situation is deteriorating,” said Frum “I think that that's the sense of panic you're hearing from the Republican senators. They know it's going to get worse. And Donald Trump is doing his part to make it worse because of his own ego needs: his desire is to get the ballroom and never pay taxes again and punish my enemies.”Ashley Allison, a former senior staffer with the Obama and Biden campaigns, said “Republican senators are lying in the bed that they made.”“They had moments of intervention, and they didn't have the moral courage, and it still came to bite them in the long run,” Allison told Collins and the panel. “Texas is going to be hard [for Democrats]. But what I will say is in the primary with James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett, we had some of the largest turnout of democratic voters in history there, because Democrats have not always organized in Texas and didn't always have a strong democratic infrastructure.” - YouTube youtu.be

Left
Read →
Trump and the GOP obliterated the Founders' key fix for a corrupt president
Alternet.org
4 hours ago

Trump and the GOP obliterated the Founders' key fix for a corrupt president

The Founding Fathers of the U.S. had a system in mind to rein in a rogue, criminal president, one who might try to pardon themselves for their own crimes.It was a system, however, that could never have conceived of a president like Donald Trump, or a party like the modern GOP that surrounds him, according to a new piece from The Dispatch, leaving the fundamentals of the constitutional order in disarray.In the piece, Dispatch editor-in-chief Jonah Goldberg observed that a foundational rule undermining the drafting of the U.S. Constitution came from British statesman Edmund Burke, and said that in a decent society, "no man should be judge in his own cause." James Madison later added to that idea, "because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.""This idea lurks behind all of Congress’ powers and responsibilities, including advice and consent, the sole authority to tax and spend, the power to declare war, and, of course, impeachment," Goldberg wrote. "Presidents are not arbitrary rulers. They are stewards, with defined and limited powers."One of Trump's latest corrupt acts, however, runs directly in the face of that notion: the settlement of Trump's suit against the IRS by creating a "weaponization" slush fund to pay out to his allies, and absolve him of future audits."On Monday, President Trump settled a $10 billion lawsuit a $10 billion lawsuit brought by himself," Goldberg detailed. "In his first term, Trump’s tax returns were illegally leaked. When Trump returned to the presidency, he filed suit against the Internal Revenue Service. So, as a constitutional matter, Trump is suing the executive branch he runs for a crime committed by the IRS back when he ran it in his first term... On Tuesday, the DOJ announced that Trump, his family and business will be functionally exempt from IRS audits or prosecutions from any past tax returns, literally placing him above the law."Goldberg further laid out some of the most blunt and high-profile examples of Trump declaring himself the sole arbiter of government action, without regard for Congress. On the subject of the U.S. potentially lending aid to Taiwan if it were invaded by China, Trump said, "I'm the only person" who would decide what happens. Following the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces, Trump said that only his "own morality" and "own mind" decided the limits of his executive actions."It may, in fact, be legal for the president to be the judge in his own cause and create a taxpayer-financed slush fund for him to reward cronies and henchmen on a whim," Goldberg concluded. "It is already clear that presidents can launch wars without Congress or the courts unduly getting in the way. But I struggle to think of hypothetical scenarios that would be more likely to arouse in Madison and his contemporaries the—now misplaced—reassurance that impeachment was an available remedy."

Left
Read →
January 6 police officers sue Trump over $1.8bn fund, alleging ‘presidential corruption’
US news | The Guardian
5 hours ago

January 6 police officers sue Trump over $1.8bn fund, alleging ‘presidential corruption’

Retired Capitol police officer and DC officer allege Trump’s $1.8bn fund unlawfully rewards January 6 rioters and alliesUS politics live – latest updatesTwo police officers who clashed with rioters at the US Capitol during the January 6 insurrection in 2021 have sued Donald Trump over plans to create a $1.776bn “anti-weaponization” fund.The fund, which critics have argued is essentially a slush fund, is set to compensate allies of the US president who he claims were victims of prosecutorial overreach. Continue reading...

Center Left
Read →
Trump tightens grip on GOP after Massie’s defeat in Kentucky primary – US politics live
US news | The Guardian
18 hours ago

Trump tightens grip on GOP after Massie’s defeat in Kentucky primary – US politics live

Republican Congressman defeated by Trump-backed challenger in most expensive House primary in historySign up for the Breaking News US emailOther election results poured in as polls closed in Kentucky, Georgia, Alabama, Pennsylvania, Idaho and Oregon.Among the most notable: US senator Tommy Tuberville won the Republican nomination for Alabama governor, former Atlanta mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms won the Democratic nomination for governor in Georgia and state representative Chris Rabb won the Democratic nomination for Pennsylvania’s third congressional district. Continue reading...

Center Left
Read →
Massie loses primary challenge in victory for Trump
Axios
21 hours ago

Massie loses primary challenge in victory for Trump

Rep. Thomas Massie lost his primary Tuesday against Ed Gallrein, a huge win for President Trump's unprecedented campaign to oust the Kentucky Republican.Why it matters: Massie's loss sends another warning to Republicans about the dangers of crossing Trump, and shows that the president's broader political problems haven't diminished his power with the base.The race was Trump's last, and most important, stop on his revenge tour to oust Republican defectors.Trump's political operation launched an aggressive effort to unseat Massie last year, its first such effort to defeat a sitting Republican incumbent.The fight between Massie and Gallrein was the most expensive House primary in history, drawing more than $32 million in ad spending, according to AdImpact.Driving the news: Trump spent months portraying Massie as disloyal to the MAGA movement. He's called Massie a "moron," a "nut job" and a "major Sleazebag.""We're in a fight against the worst congressman in the history of our country," Trump said in an Oval Office video posted on Truth Social Monday.At a March rally in Massie's district, Trump said: "Give me somebody with a warm body to beat Massie, and I got somebody with a warm body, but a big, beautiful brain, and a great patriot."Gallrein is a farmer and former Navy SEAL officer hand-picked by Trump to challenge Massie.He's unequivocally backed the Trump agenda, saying Monday: "There has never been a more important time to stand behind our president."The other side: Massie contends the White House wants "100% compliance.""I vote with the President 90% of the time. I voted for the SAVE Act. I voted for DHS. In fact, by most scorecards, I'm the most conservative Republican, so it's only the 10% of the time they're mad about," he said.Catch up quick: Massie and Trump's contentious relationship dates back to Trump's first term.In 2020, Massie opposed Trump's COVID relief package, leading the president to call for Massie to be thrown "out of the Republican Party."Massie was also one of only two House Republicans to vote against Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" in 2025. Last summer, Massie sought to repair his relationship with the president, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was able to broker a truce, Axios previously reported.The ceasefire didn't last long. Days later, Massie ramped up his public criticism of the administration's handling of the Epstein files, and later led the push to release the files in defiance of Trump.Between the lines: Trump has taken out a number of Republican politicians who cross him.Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a top target of the president, lost his reelection bid on Saturday when he failed to finish in the top two in the state's GOP primary.Trump also exacted retribution on a group of Indiana Republican state legislators who blocked his push to redraw the state's congressional map.

Center Left
Read →
Trump’s allies in danger of scraping false hope from Maga victory in Kentucky primary
US news | The Guardian
9 hours ago

Trump’s allies in danger of scraping false hope from Maga victory in Kentucky primary

US president, like a cult leader whose commune keeps getting smaller, commands fierce loyalty from a shrinking base“Thomas Massie caught in a throuple!” screamed the AI-generated attack ad that showed the Republican congressman supposedly dining with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar then checking into a hotel with the two progressives. “Thomas Massie betrayed President Trump!” it added.Crude but effective, as it turns out. Massie, from northern Kentucky, lost the most expensive House of Representatives primary election in history on Tuesday to Ed Gallrein, a farmer and former US Navy Seal backed by Donald Trump. Continue reading...

Center Left
Read →
Longtime MAGA voter says he’s voting 'against Trump' in GOP primary
Alternet.org
Yesterday

Longtime MAGA voter says he’s voting 'against Trump' in GOP primary

There are several elections on Tuesday in the U.S., but one major one is a Kentucky House race that has proven to be the most costly in history ($32 million). On the ground, Republicans are voting on whether to retain Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been a thorn in the side of President Donald Trump in the past year. One MAGA voter was all in on Massie, despite their feud. CNN national affairs correspondent Jeff Zeleny said that the election is for Massie, but it might as well be about Trump. "It's a loyalty test for President Trump. And Thomas Massie has long been on the list of the White House as the top Republican who infuriates the president more than anyone else," said Zeleny. "Why is that? Of course, Thomas Massie led the charge to release the [Jeffrey] Epstein files. He has also voted against some key pieces of legislation, and he's been a critic of the Iraq War. Otherwise, he largely votes the conservative line. There's no doubt that Massie has a contrarian libertarian streak. That is one of the things that voters here say they like about him a lot, actually."Trump, on the other hand, is "fixated" on Massie, Zeleny continued. He's been willing to throw as much money as necessary to go after Massie and tear him down. "But as we've been talking to voters here in northern Kentucky, they're viewing this race through a different lens," he explained. Kentucky voter Rob Barkley said he voted for Trump in 2016 but didn't support him recently. Now that it has come between Trump or Massie, Barkley said he's against Trump. "I voted for Massie because he's pretty much against — he's on the Republican side. So he does have a conservative mindset, but he's not as far leaning right as the trump politics and basically a voting against Trump, honestly," the GOP voter said. "You voted against Trump?" Zeleny asked."I did not vote for Trump in the previous election. I voted for him the first time, and then I went against him the second time. But on this one, it's predominantly around just his — the stuff he does," said Barkley.

Left
Read →
Donald Trump is not coming back from this
Alternet.org
10 hours ago

Donald Trump is not coming back from this

Donald Trump’s rapid descent into his own special hell is gaining speed. This hulking, demented racist conman will eventually land with a thud, with only the billions in cold, hard cash he has drained from the American taxpayer to cushion his collapse.Our standing on the world stage has taken a hit we might never recover from. We have no allies, only old neighbors who are watching in disbelief as the big, old white house on the block burns out of control. Our air and water is getting dirtier by the hour, and food prices are higher every time we wander into a store. Women have less rights than they did 50 years ago, and the Jim Crow South is back. Our government has been dismantled by greedy, billionaire Orcs, so that it works exclusively for them and not us.America has never been worse off, and that is the best we could have hoped for following that ghastly election in November, 2024, which handed Republicans the Executive, the Court, the House and the Senate.Because it actually could have been worse …In the worst-case scenario, Trump would have been an incoherent madman able to rein in his worst instincts as a subhuman, and worked diligently to at least give the phony appearance he was doing all he could to keep prices under control, and America out of any asinine wars.He would have worked quietly behind the scenes raking in cash to ruin us at the behest of those billionaire Orcs, and most Americans wouldn’t have been the wiser. As we have painfully learned over the past decade there are more than enough shallow people in America who are willing to go along with almost any abomination — including the caging of children — just as long as the gasoline they are pumping into their hulking vehicles is as cheap as they are.Under this worst-case scenario enough Americans would have gone along with Trump’s very worst, because somehow they would have continued to believe the fantasy that their lives would improve, even if every metric told them otherwise.Republicans’ chances going into midterms would be decent. There would be no talk of Democrats taking back the Senate, and plenty of predictions that Republicans would actually increase their advantage.Troops would be in the streets just in case.Three-dollar gas can mask a world of hurt in America.Well, that worst-case scenario didn’t come to pass, and there are signs everywhere that upwards of 70 percent of Americans do not like what is happening in their country right now. Whether that matters or if it is too late is still up for debate, but at this moment, America still has a shot to save itself in the nick of time.A New York Times/Siena poll released Monday has Trump’s approval rating at 37 percent, which is the lowest number in that paper’s polling since Trump hulked on the scene in 2016.Under the headline: Trump’s Approval Sinks Amid Unpopular War, Darkening GOP Prospects the case is made by the paper that …“… no president’s approval rating has been under 38 percent for more than a few days in the last 17 years. If there has been a floor during this partisan era of politics, Trump’s ratings today have fallen to it.”Adding …“The most immediate political consequences is that Democrats appear increasingly well positioned for the midterm elections in November. The poll shows Democrats have a double-digit lead, 50 percent to 39 percent, when registered voters are asked which party’s candidate they’ll support for Congress.” If you are one of those people saying right now that it is insane his approvals are that high, I will readily agree, but one of us hasn’t been paying attention to the past decade during which America has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it isn’t even a good country, much less a great one ...Under this best-case scenario we simply must accept that historically low approvals is the best we can hope for as we steam toward the latest most-important elections of our lives in November.The NYT poll mirrors an NPR poll two weeks ago that I typed about extensively. From that story:More than 80% of Americans say pain at the pump is straining their household budgets and a striking majority blames the president, according to a NPR/PBS News/Marist poll. The poll found that President Trump faces his lowest popularity ever and is experiencing major declines with key demographics since being sworn in for his second term. Most Americans said the economy isn’t working for them. The war in Iran — which has directly led to higher gas prices — is increasingly unpopular. Those challenges have given Democrats a distinct advantage in the midterm elections.

Left
Read →
Trump wanders out of White House to give free-wheeling rant in front ballroom construction
Raw Story
Yesterday

Trump wanders out of White House to give free-wheeling rant in front ballroom construction

President Donald Trump stepped outside the White House on Tuesday to survey the sprawling construction site where his prized ballroom is rising from the rubble of the demolished East Wing — and delivered a lengthy, freewheeling tour that touched on drone warfare, Greek architecture, and his place in history."This is my gift to the United States of America," Trump told reporters as he gestured at the concrete skeleton taking shape on the White House grounds. "I'm going to be able to use it very little. When it's finished, we're talking about six or seven months. But it will be used for hopefully hundreds of years by other presidents."Trump's remarks ranged across the building's classical facade ("This is Rome. They like the flat roof. Greece likes the triangles"), its four-inch-thick bulletproof glass, and its "dead flat roof" — designed, he said, specifically to serve as a military drone port. "It's built for our snipers," he added, "not the enemy's snipers."The president also took a swipe at a federal judge who has repeatedly tried to halt construction. "We have a judge that thinks it's a terrible thing that we're making a gift," Trump said. "He said it's terrible — that it should be paid for by the taxpayer. That's something I've never heard before."The ballroom, now projected to cost $400 million and set to open around September 2028, has been a near-daily obsession for the president. Trump has publicly highlighted the ballroom project on roughly a third of all days this year — and it shows no sign of slowing down.When a reporter pressed Trump on why Congress was being asked to weigh in if the project is privately funded, he acknowledged the tension — barely. "Congress is approving money for security," he said. "It may go — some of it may go here for additional security. I don't know."That's something of an understatement. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has introduced legislation including $1 billion earmarked for security improvements accompanying the ballroom project — a far cry from Trump's repeated vow that "not one penny" of taxpayer money would be spent.The project has been dogged by legal challenges, design mockery from architects, and polls showing Americans oppose it 2-to-1. A YouGov survey found that 61% of U.S. adults did not approve of the construction, and the National Capital Planning Commission received over 32,000 public comments, overwhelmingly opposing it — some comparing its aesthetics to a "Vegas casino."None of that appeared to dampen Trump's enthusiasm on Tuesday."There will never be anything like this built again," he said. "There will never be a roof built with this kind of safety."

Far Left
Read →
What to Know About the DOJ’s $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' That Could Compensate Trump Allies Investigated Under Biden
TIME
2 days ago

What to Know About the DOJ’s $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' That Could Compensate Trump Allies Investigated Under Biden

The creation of the fund, which could be used to compensate Trump allies investigated under Biden, is part of deal to resolve the President's lawsuit against the IRS.

Center Left
Read →

The Daily Brief

Get the top headlines from Left, Right, and Center delivered to your inbox every morning.

Join Free→
Senate majority leader signals tough road ahead for Trump’s $1.7 billion slush fund
Alternet.org
2 days ago

Senate majority leader signals tough road ahead for Trump’s $1.7 billion slush fund

Much of the criticism of President Donald Trump's $1.7 billion "weaponization fund" is coming from Democrats, who are attacking it as a "slush fund." But some conservatives are speaking out as well — including Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota), who is saying he's "not a big fan" of the fund. After Trump and his allies dropped their $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), they did so on the condition that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) would set up a $1.7 billion fund to help people who, MAGA Republicans claim, were wrongly targeted for "lawfare" under former President Joe Biden and ex-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.According to The Hill's Alexander Bolton, Thune said of the fund, "Not a big fan. I'm not exactly sure how they would use it but my understanding is that was just announced. But yeah, I don't see a purpose."On the right, the fund is also drawing criticism from the conservative National Review's editorial board — which used much stronger language in a scathing editorial published on May 19.The Review editors argued that "hard-to-supervise slush funds aimed at financing well-connected political allies are exactly the sort of thing a populist presidency is supposed to end."Trump is claiming that Biden used the DOJ to target his political enemies, and he is describing the "anti-weaponization fund" as a way to help them out.

Left
Read →
5 things to know as new details emerge about deadly shooting at San Diego Islamic Center
Raw Story
2 days ago

5 things to know as new details emerge about deadly shooting at San Diego Islamic Center

Two suspects and three victims have died at a shooting at the San Diego Islamic Center on Monday as more details emerged. Investigators shared additional information about the shooting at 7050 Eckstrom Ave, just west of the 805 Freeway.Here are five things to know about the fatal shooting.1. Two suspects, who died of self-inflicted gunshots and were found in a vehicle near the mosque, were reportedly teenagers. They were believed to be ages 17 and 19, according to the FBI. Their names were not immediately released. It's unclear what motivated the shooting.CNN analyst Josh Campbell described the involvement of two shooters as "unusual."2. A security guard killed in the shooting was "pivotal" in preventing further deaths or harm.“One of the deceased is a security guard that works there and I think played a pivotal role in assisting from this being much worse,” San Diego Police Department Chief Scott Wahl told reporters.The security guard's name was not immediately released. It appears this guard prevented people from entering the location where a group of children was located. No children were hurt. Children were seen in footage holding hands and escorting the site.The suspects also shot at a gardener. The gardener was not injured, according to authorities.3. The FBI was investigating the incident as a hate crime. No known motive was immediately released. Authorities said they would investigate the incident as a hate crime until it's determined that it's not because it's a place of worship. 4. The location of the shooting is the largest Islamic center in San Diego. The mosque is about 9 miles north of San Diego and is the largest mosque in San Diego County, according to The Associated Press.5. Authorities were asking the public to contact them with additional information and tips. Anyone with information can visit at fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI to report any information about the incident.

Far Left
Read →
What to Know About House Primaries as Massie Faces Trump-Backed Challenger in Kentucky
NYT > U.S. > Politics
20 hours ago

What to Know About House Primaries as Massie Faces Trump-Backed Challenger in Kentucky

In Kentucky, Thomas Massie is fighting off a Trump-backed challenger. Democrats in Pennsylvania have a big decision to make.

Center Left
Read →
Who is Ken Paxton, Trump’s pick in the Texas Senate race?
NYT > U.S. > Politics
Yesterday

Who is Ken Paxton, Trump’s pick in the Texas Senate race?

Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, seems poised to defeat Senator John Cornyn, a four-term incumbent.

Center Left
Read →
Justice Department agrees not to pursue any tax claims against Trump as part of IRS deal
NBC News Politics
Yesterday

Justice Department agrees not to pursue any tax claims against Trump as part of IRS deal

An addendum to the settlement says the government is “forever barred” from seeking any sort of financial relief against Trump, his oldest sons and their companies.

Center Left
Read →
I.R.S. Must Drop Audits of Trump and Family
NYT > U.S. > Politics
Yesterday

I.R.S. Must Drop Audits of Trump and Family

As part of the Justice Department’s compensation fund deal, officials vowed not to pursue any matters, including those involving President Trump’s tax returns, that are pending.

Center Left
Read →
Could the U.S. Indict Cuban Ex-President Raúl Castro?
TIME
3 hours ago

Could the U.S. Indict Cuban Ex-President Raúl Castro?

The exact charges may be announced soon, as the Trump Administration escalates pressure on yet another foreign government.

Center Left
Read →
Trump's revenge tour comes for Massie
Axios
Yesterday

Trump's revenge tour comes for Massie

Today's Kentucky primary is President Trump's biggest test yet of whether his iron grip on the Republican base can hold even as war and inflation batter his national standing.Why it matters: Trump is trying to take out longtime antagonist Thomas Massie in the most expensive House primary in history — a contest that will show whether his iconoclastic brand of libertarian politics still has a place in the GOP. Until now, the seven-term Massie had never faced a serious threat to reelection. Trump changed that.Trump's political operation launched an aggressive effort to unseat Massie last year, its first such effort to defeat a sitting Republican incumbent.The fight between Massie and Trump-backed rival Ed Gallrein has drawn more than $32 million in ad spending, according to AdImpact.Driving the news: Trump has spent months portraying Massie as disloyal to the MAGA movement. He's called Massie a "moron," a "nut job" and "major Sleazebag.""He is the Worst "Republican" Congressman in History," Trump posted on Truth Social Sunday.At a March rally in Massie's district, Trump said: "Give me somebody with a warm body to beat Massie, and I got somebody with a warm body, but a big, beautiful brain, and a great patriot."The other side: "They want 100% compliance," Massie said of the White House."I vote with the President 90% of the time. I voted for the SAVE Act. I voted for DHS. In fact, by most scorecards, I'm the most conservative Republican, so it's only the 10% of the time they're mad about."Between the lines: Trump has taken out a number of Republican politicians who cross him.Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a top target of the president, lost his reelection bid when he failed to finish in the top two in a primary Saturday.Trump also exacted retribution on a group of Indiana Republican state legislators who blocked his push to redraw the state's congressional map. Five of the seven lost their primaries last month.And Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), who spent the weekend campaigning with Massie in his district, has now caught the ire of Trump. The president invited a primary challenger to run against her in a post on Truth Social Saturday, calling Boebert "weak minded."Catch up quick: Massie and Trump's contentious relationship dates back to Trump's first term.In 2020, Massie opposed Trump's Covid relief package, leading the president to call for Massie to be thrown "out of the Republican Party."Massie was also one of only two House Republicans to vote against Trump's "big, beautiful bill."Last summer, Massie sought to repair his relationship with the president, and Speaker Mike Johnson was able to broker a truce, Axios previously reported.The ceasefire didn't last long. Days later, Massie ramped up his public criticism of the administration's handling of the Epstein files, and later led the push to release the files in defiance of Trump.Zoom in: The race has spiraled into an especially nasty and personal fight, with both sides trying to portray the other as out of step with the GOP base on a range of culture-war issues.Outside groups aligned with Trump and pro-Israel donors have spent millions attacking Massie over his criticism of Israel and opposition to some foreign aid packages.Pro-Massie groups, meanwhile, have labeled Gallrein "Woke Eddie" and aired an AI-generated ad depicting the retired Navy SEAL abandoning Trump on a battlefield.One pro-Massie ad attacked Gallrein's ties to GOP megadonor Paul Singer — who is Jewish and supports LGBTQ rights — by featuring a rainbow-colored Star of David and warning that the "LGBTQ mafia" was trying to take over the district. "If Gallrein wins, the weirdos take over," the ad says.The bottom line: A loss for Massie would send another warning to Republicans about the dangers of crossing Trump — and show that the president's broader political problems haven't diminished his power with the base."If I lose, I think it's going to disenfranchise a large part of the coalition that was formed to give us the majority here and to give us the White House," Massie told reporters at the Capitol last week.

Center Left
Read →
After primary loss, Sen. Bill Cassidy defends his 2021 vote to convict Trump
NBC News Politics
2 days ago

After primary loss, Sen. Bill Cassidy defends his 2021 vote to convict Trump

Sen. Bill Cassidy defended his 2021 vote to convict President Donald Trump on impeachment charges, saying he would rather be remembered for standing up for his principles even if it ended his career in the Senate.

Center Left
Read →
Republican Primary for Georgia Governor Will Go to a Runoff
NYT > U.S. > Politics
18 hours ago

Republican Primary for Georgia Governor Will Go to a Runoff

The state’s lieutenant governor, Burt Jones, will face a billionaire health care executive, Rick Jackson, on June 16 to decide the party’s standard-bearer to succeed Gov. Brian Kemp.

Center Left
Read →
Senate Votes to Take Up Measure to Force Trump to End Iran War
NYT > U.S. > Politics
21 hours ago

Senate Votes to Take Up Measure to Force Trump to End Iran War

With four Republican backers, Democrats won a vote to advance a resolution that would force the president to end hostilities or win authorization from Congress.

Center Left
Read →
Senate advances resolution to end Iran war as GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy flips to support it
NBC News Politics
21 hours ago

Senate advances resolution to end Iran war as GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy flips to support it

The Senate voted to move forward with a resolution to force President Donald Trump to end the war in Iran, a breakthrough for the Democratic-led effort.

Center Left
Read →
ParallaxNews.io

Support ParallaxNews.io

Shopping on Amazon? Use our link to support Parallax at no extra cost to you.

Shop Now→
‘He sacrificed his life’: security guard killed in San Diego mosque attack hailed as hero
US news | The Guardian
3 hours ago

‘He sacrificed his life’: security guard killed in San Diego mosque attack hailed as hero

Amin Abdullah, 51, was one of the three victims of deadly shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego on MondayA security guard who was killed during the shooting at a San Diego mosque on Monday is being hailed as a hero after police said that his actions “undoubtedly” saved lives.On Monday, two teenagers opened fire at the Islamic Center of San Diego, California, shooting and killing three men. The two attackers, aged 17 and 18, were found dead several blocks away, from apparent self-inflicted gunshot wounds, officials said. Continue reading...

Center Left
Read →
Rubio offers "new relationship" to Cuban people
Axios
3 hours ago

Rubio offers "new relationship" to Cuban people

Secretary of State Marco Rubio marked Cuban Independence Day on Wednesday with a Spanish-language video message to the people of the island that blamed their "unimaginable hardships" on their communist leadership.Why it matters: This is the first time Rubio has addressed the Cuban population directly as secretary of state. It's part of the Trump administration's multi-layered pressure campaign targeting Havana."The real reason you don't have electricity, fuel, or food is because those who control your country have plundered billions of dollars, but nothing has been used to help the people," Rubio says in the speech.Later Wednesday, the Justice Department will unveil the indictment of Cuba's de facto leader, Raúl Castro, for allegedly ordering the shootdown of two Miami-based rescue planes in 1996.Zoom in: Rubio's speech focuses on the Cuban military business conglomerate known as GAESA — founded by Castro — that has an estimated $18 billion in assets and controls 70% of Cuba's economy through its control of hotels, construction, banks, stores and cash remittance from the U.S.Rubio contrasts the wealthy elites who run GAESA with the lives of destitute Cubans, seeking to show that revolutionary communism is a kleptocratic sham."Cuba is not controlled by any 'revolution.' Cuba is controlled by GAESA," Rubio says.'The only role played by the so-called 'government' is to demand that you continue making 'sacrifices' and repressing anyone who dares to complain."He adds: "Today, from media to entertainment, from the private sector to politics, and from music to sports, Cubans have reached the top of virtually ALL industries, in all countries, except one ... Cuba."The other side: Cuba's government and supporters blame the island's troubles on the longstanding U.S. embargo, the Trump administration's new sanctions and the lack of oil it used to receive for free from Venezuela before the U.S. seized leader Nicolas Maduro on Jan. 3."Acting as the world's policeman and in blatant violation of international law and the fundamental principles of free trade in goods and services, the sovereign right of all states that have or wish to maintain economic, commercial, and financial relations with Cuba is being explicitly, blatantly, and directly attacked," read a May 8 editorial in state-run media that criticized Trump's recent executive order imposing new sanctions.At Rubio's suggestion, Trump's executive order was issued on May 1 because it coincided with the communist International Workers Day.The big picture: Cuba's economy and government have never been in such an advanced state of decay as it is now. Food and fuel are scarce. Electricity is available for only two hours a day in some places."President Trump is offering a new relationship between the U.S. and Cuba. But it must be directly with you, the Cuban people, not with GAESA," Rubio says.The Trump administration is offering "$100 million in food and medicine for you, the people," he says, but it needs to be distributed by the "Catholic Church or other trusted charitable groups. Not stolen by GAESA to sell in one of their stores."Meanwhile, U.S. officials told Axios, Cuba's government has found enough money to buy at least 300 attack drones from Russia and China in case hostilities erupt.Cuba also hosts Iranian, Russian and Chinese military and intelligence officials.Flashback: In Trump's first term, Rubio was a U.S. senator from Florida and helped the president in 2017 construct a new sanctions regime that revolved around starving GAESA of money.A year later, Rubio and his fellow Cuban Americans from Miami called for the indictment of Castro by the Justice Department, which will officially happen today.Between the lines: The Castro indictment signifies that U.S. negotiators aren't making significant progress with Cuban leaders in negotiating a peaceful transition to a more democratic country that's no longer considered a state sponsor of terror by the U.S.State Department personnel and CIA Director John Ratcliffe have flown to Cuba and spoken to leaders there, including Castro's grandson, Raulito Castro, who has also met with Rubio.All U.S. officials have delivered the same message urging Cuba to free political prisoners, hold free elections and return land to U.S. persons and businesses that were seized after the 1959 revolution.Zoom out: May 20 marks Cuba's birth as a republic in 1902 following the Spanish-American War, but the holiday isn't celebrated on the island itself.Fidel Castro's government scrapped the holiday after the 1959 revolution.What's next: More indictments of other Cuban officials and more sanctions announcements are likely on their way from the Trump administration.Rubio's speech doesn't mention that, but instead offers "you, the ordinary Cuban, and not just GAESA," the right to own a business, whether it's a gas station or a media company."A new Cuba," Rubio says, would be a place where people can vote on their government officials and "where...

Center Left
Read →
Raúl Castro Has Guided Cuba for Decades
NYT > U.S. > Politics
8 hours ago

Raúl Castro Has Guided Cuba for Decades

Raúl Castro is 94 and no longer holds any official title, but he still wields enormous power, experts say, particularly over the military.

Center Left
Read →
DOJ indicts Raúl Castro over fatal 1996 civilian planes’ shooting
NBC News Politics
3 hours ago

DOJ indicts Raúl Castro over fatal 1996 civilian planes’ shooting

The Justice Department indicted former Cuban president Raúl Castro on Wednesday in connection to the 1996 shooting of two civilian planes that killed four Cuban Americans.

Center Left
Read →
First Thing: Five people, including two suspects, killed in shooting at San Diego’s largest mosque
US news | The Guardian
Yesterday

First Thing: Five people, including two suspects, killed in shooting at San Diego’s largest mosque

Teenage suspects died from self-inflicted gunshot wounds, say officials. Plus, why American women want to leave the US at twice the rate of men• Don’t already get First Thing in your inbox? Sign up hereGood morning.Authorities are investigating a shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego as a hate crime.What do we know about the suspects? The mother of one of the suspects had called police about two hours prior, informing them that her son was missing along with several of her weapons and her vehicle. Police were looking for the teenager and his friend when they received a 911 call from ICSD.What is Trump claiming now? That the leaders of Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia approached Washington over the chance of making a deal that would be “very acceptable” to the US, and stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.… and Iran? Its foreign military spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, claimed Pakistan had shared Iran’s latest proposal with the US. There were contradictory reports from Islamabad, which has acted as mediator: one source appeared pessimistic, while others said Tehran had made concessions. Continue reading...

Center Left
Read →
Trump says he's pausing plan to attack Iran
Axios
Yesterday

Trump says he's pausing plan to attack Iran

President Trump said Monday that he'd planned to strike Iran "tomorrow" but was holding off to give negotiations another chance. He claimed he made the decision at the request of several Arab leaders.Why it matters: The White House saw an updated peace proposal Iran sent Sunday as insufficient, leading to a growing expectation — including inside the White House — that Trump was about to strike.Trump has extended deadlines and postponed planned attacks on Iran at least half a dozen times since the war began.Driving the news: Trump was expected to convene his top national security team in the Situation Room on Tuesday to discuss military options, two U.S. officials told Axios.A senior U.S. official told Axios on Monday morning that if Iran didn't shift its position, the U.S. would have to continue the negotiations "through bombs."What he's saying: "I have been asked by the Emir of Qatar, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia and the President of the United Arab Emirates to hold off on our planned Military attack of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was scheduled for tomorrow," Trump wrote Monday on Truth Social.He added that the Arab leaders told him that "serious negotiations are now taking place, and that, in their opinion, as Great Leaders and Allies, a Deal will be made, which will be very acceptable to the United States of America, as well as all Countries in the Middle East, and beyond."Trump claimed the deal would make sure that Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons.He has made repeated claims about progress toward a deal since the war began, but there have been no recent breakthroughs.Behind the scenes: Trump spoke on the phone with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE in the 24 hours before his announcement, two sources with knowledge said. One U.S. official claimed there had been "a unified message from Doha, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh. It was along the lines of 'give negotiations a chance because if you hit Iran, we will all pay the price for it.'"A second source with knowledge said Trump had told some of his hawkish political allies the three Arab leaders told him "they don't want their oil and energy facilities blown up" due to Iranian retaliation.Trump told reporters the Arab leaders had asked him to hold off "for two or three days," adding that he'd informed Israel ahead of time of his decision.What to watch: The president wrote Monday on Truth Social that he had instructed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine to suspend the attack plans but to be prepared to go forward "with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment's notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached."

Center Left
Read →
Trigger

Parallax News uses AI to aggregate how different media bubbles cover the same world.

Headlines and summaries are aggregated via public RSS feeds and remain the property of their respective publishers. Parallax Pulse analyses are original content. For copyright inquiries or removal requests, please contactcontact@parallaxnews.io.

Contact

Top Stories — Full Spectrum News

Compare how Left, Center, and Right media cover the same breaking stories. Tap any headline to see side-by-side perspectives.

  • The Real Reason Thomas Massie Lost

    The Atlantic·Center Left·33 mins ago

    He broke the one real rule of the MAGA Republican Party.

  • Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Finds Its First Shady Applicant

    The New Republic·Left·4 hours ago

    Donald Trump’s allies are racing to get a piece of his $1.8 billion slush fund.Michael Caputo served in the Trump administration during his first term as a campaign strategist and spokesperson at the Department of Health and Human Services, where he interfered with CDC findings on Covid. He is now seeking $2.7 million in damages from the government, claiming his life was upended after being investigated as part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe in 2016.“I was the target of the illegal Crossfire Hurricane investigation and our family suffered greatly during that dark era of political weaponization,” Caputo wrote in a letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche obtained by CNN. He claimed he was still under FBI investigation as recently as December 2025.“They found nothing; we lost everything,” he wrote.Caputo resided in Russia in the 1990s while an employee of the U.S. government. The Mueller report determined he had helped arrange a meeting between Roger Stone—Trump’s campaign manager and close associate—and a Russian agent, for the purpose of sharing information about Hillary Clinton.But who cares what FBI investigations say when your buddy is president? Now Caputo can get a huge chunk of taxpayer money because he thinks he was wronged by people Trump doesn’t like.Caputo is the first to publicly seek damages after the slush fund was created, but he won’t be the last.The Department of Justice has not said exactly who can profit off the fund, but hundreds of Trump allies—including January 6 rioters and members of Trump’s own super PAC—could theoretically get a piece of the pie.

  • How Trump's $1.8B "anti-weaponization" fund works

    Axios·Center Left·6 hours ago

    President Trump sued his own administration, settled and will now spend $1.776 billion of taxpayer money to pay people who say the government targeted them politically.Why it matters: The "Anti-Weaponization Fund" turns a personal Trump settlement into a new government program, shields decisions on who gets the money from the courts and limits information about what the public knows about where the funds go.The backstory: Trump sued the IRS and Treasury in January for $10 billion over the 2019 leak of his tax returns. The settlement gives Trump, his sons and the Trump Organization a formal apology but no money, and it bars the IRS from auditing Trump's past tax returns.Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer, created the Anti-Weaponization Fund with the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund.How it works: The attorney general will handpick the five-member commission that decides who will collect money from the fund, which ends in December 2028.Those decisions can't be appealed or challenged in court. The settlement does not require public disclosure of payouts.The settlement lets the fund spend part of the $1.776 billion on itself, including staff, travel and facilities. The Justice Department and the White House did not answer Axios' question about whether there is any cap on those costs.Who's eligible: Almost anyone alleging "weaponization" or "lawfare" can apply, Blanche told a Senate Appropriations subcommittee Tuesday.Blanche refused to commit that people convicted of assaulting Capitol Police would be excluded: "I'm not one of the commissioners setting up the rules."Vice President Vance separately said that even Tina Peters, the former Colorado county clerk convicted of a state crime, and Hunter Biden, the son of former President Biden, could be compensated.Context: Trump's new fund is possible thanks to a Judgment Fund created by Congress in 1956, so the government could quickly pay off court losses and settlements without voting each time.Initially, payouts were limited to $100,000. That cap was lifted in 1978.Critics have previously warned that it lets administrations spend huge sums with little oversight. The Obama administration's $1.7 billion Judgment Fund payment to Iran became a major flashpoint in 2016.Zoom in: Paul Figley, who spent 32 years at the Justice Department and is an expert on the Judgment Fund, tells Axios this use is "certainly not what Congress anticipated when it set the system up.""It's bad policy, but it's Congress's fault" for leaving a "huge loophole," Figley said. He expects future administrations of either party to do the same "until Congress stops it."Nobody typically has standing to challenge Judgment Fund payouts in court, he said.Yes, but: Legal challenges over Trump's fund have already begun.Two officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, sued Wednesday to dissolve the fund, calling it "the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century."Former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges argue the fund will bankroll Proud Boys and Jan. 6 rioters who have threatened their lives.The suit invokes the 14th Amendment's bar on the U.S. paying "any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection."The other side: Blanche and the Justice Department repeatedly pointed to a $760 million Obama-era Keepseagle settlement for Native American farmers alleging Agriculture Department discrimination as precedent for the fund's existence.But that settlement was approved by a federal judge after years of litigation.Trump's case settled days before the Justice Department was due to respond to a court order asking if the president's lawsuit against agencies he oversees was a real dispute.

  • First Thing: Trump critic Thomas Massie defeated in Kentucky Republican House primary

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·9 hours ago

    Seven-term incumbent had spoken out against Iran war, government spending and Jeffrey Epstein files. Plus, Trump’s ‘board of peace’ receives just $23m to rebuild GazaDon’t already get First Thing in your inbox? Sign up hereGood morning.Voters in northern Kentucky on Tuesday rejected the incumbent congressman Thomas Massie, who has been critical of Donald Trump, in favor of the president’s hand-picked candidate.Where else held primaries on Tuesday? Pennsylvania, Georgia, Alabama, Oregon and Idaho. Georgia also delivered a defeat to a prominent Trump critic, while a Trump ally won in Alabama, too.How significant was Kentucky? Massie, a seven-term incumbent, has been an outspoken GOP opponent to Trump – repeatedly clashing with the president over Iran, government spending and the Jeffrey Epstein files. In response, Trump treated the primary as a personal vendetta.What is at the top of the agenda? For Putin, it is likely to be reciprocal trade and investment, as Russia’s economy continues to suffer over the cost of its war in Ukraine and related sanctions. China, Russia’s largest trading partner, buys almost half of Moscow’s oil exports.What about foreign policy? Xi said the world was in danger of returning to the “law of the jungle”, adding that further hostilities in the Middle East were “inadvisable”, and calling for a ceasefire, state media reported. Continue reading...

  • Prison to Pardons to Payouts: Jan. 6 Rioters Are Elated at Trump’s $1.8 Billion Fund

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·3 hours ago

    The possibility that people who ransacked the Capitol could get money from the government they attacked is the latest head-spinning twist in President Trump’s effort to rewrite the history of Jan. 6.

  • Republicans say Trump blew up Texas for 'his ego'

    Alternet.org·Left·11 hours ago

    Former Bush Speechwriter David Frum and Republican strategist David Urban each took turns unloading on President Donald Trump for making Republicans’ difficult November fight even harder in ruby-red Texas and everywhere else.The punches came after Trump endorsed problematic Texas AG Ken Paxton over incumbent Texas Republican John Cornyn, who was assured an easy victory.“I think [Sen.] Lindsey Graham summed it up best,” Urban told CNN anchor Kaitlyn Collins. “It's going to cost three times as much now [to win that Texas seat]. That's what's really underpinning all this in a Texas race that Cornyn … was kind of a walk to win and beat [Democratic challenger James] Talarico. But Paxton — completely different story.”“I've seen some numbers where it's estimated the [National Republican Senatorial Committee] is going to have to spend an additional $250 million in Texas. That's not pocket change, when you got a race in Maine and a race in Alaska to help protect. Some of these races are going to be close. And if you have to spend 250 million bucks in Texas now to kind of prop up a guy who may not be the strongest candidate in a general election.”“I also think that if you look at the situation in May and project it forward to November, you're not understanding the dynamics of the American economy,” warned Frum. “This is a slowing economy. By November, it will be clear that Donald Trump lost the war in Iran. It will be clear that all Americans got out of it was higher gas prices, higher food prices, higher fuel prices. You're probably going to be in a very slow job creation situation by the second half of the year and continuing high rising prices.”“So, the situation is deteriorating,” said Frum “I think that that's the sense of panic you're hearing from the Republican senators. They know it's going to get worse. And Donald Trump is doing his part to make it worse because of his own ego needs: his desire is to get the ballroom and never pay taxes again and punish my enemies.”Ashley Allison, a former senior staffer with the Obama and Biden campaigns, said “Republican senators are lying in the bed that they made.”“They had moments of intervention, and they didn't have the moral courage, and it still came to bite them in the long run,” Allison told Collins and the panel. “Texas is going to be hard [for Democrats]. But what I will say is in the primary with James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett, we had some of the largest turnout of democratic voters in history there, because Democrats have not always organized in Texas and didn't always have a strong democratic infrastructure.” - YouTube youtu.be

  • Trump and the GOP obliterated the Founders' key fix for a corrupt president

    Alternet.org·Left·4 hours ago

    The Founding Fathers of the U.S. had a system in mind to rein in a rogue, criminal president, one who might try to pardon themselves for their own crimes.It was a system, however, that could never have conceived of a president like Donald Trump, or a party like the modern GOP that surrounds him, according to a new piece from The Dispatch, leaving the fundamentals of the constitutional order in disarray.In the piece, Dispatch editor-in-chief Jonah Goldberg observed that a foundational rule undermining the drafting of the U.S. Constitution came from British statesman Edmund Burke, and said that in a decent society, "no man should be judge in his own cause." James Madison later added to that idea, "because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.""This idea lurks behind all of Congress’ powers and responsibilities, including advice and consent, the sole authority to tax and spend, the power to declare war, and, of course, impeachment," Goldberg wrote. "Presidents are not arbitrary rulers. They are stewards, with defined and limited powers."One of Trump's latest corrupt acts, however, runs directly in the face of that notion: the settlement of Trump's suit against the IRS by creating a "weaponization" slush fund to pay out to his allies, and absolve him of future audits."On Monday, President Trump settled a $10 billion lawsuit a $10 billion lawsuit brought by himself," Goldberg detailed. "In his first term, Trump’s tax returns were illegally leaked. When Trump returned to the presidency, he filed suit against the Internal Revenue Service. So, as a constitutional matter, Trump is suing the executive branch he runs for a crime committed by the IRS back when he ran it in his first term... On Tuesday, the DOJ announced that Trump, his family and business will be functionally exempt from IRS audits or prosecutions from any past tax returns, literally placing him above the law."Goldberg further laid out some of the most blunt and high-profile examples of Trump declaring himself the sole arbiter of government action, without regard for Congress. On the subject of the U.S. potentially lending aid to Taiwan if it were invaded by China, Trump said, "I'm the only person" who would decide what happens. Following the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces, Trump said that only his "own morality" and "own mind" decided the limits of his executive actions."It may, in fact, be legal for the president to be the judge in his own cause and create a taxpayer-financed slush fund for him to reward cronies and henchmen on a whim," Goldberg concluded. "It is already clear that presidents can launch wars without Congress or the courts unduly getting in the way. But I struggle to think of hypothetical scenarios that would be more likely to arouse in Madison and his contemporaries the—now misplaced—reassurance that impeachment was an available remedy."

  • January 6 police officers sue Trump over $1.8bn fund, alleging ‘presidential corruption’

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·5 hours ago

    Retired Capitol police officer and DC officer allege Trump’s $1.8bn fund unlawfully rewards January 6 rioters and alliesUS politics live – latest updatesTwo police officers who clashed with rioters at the US Capitol during the January 6 insurrection in 2021 have sued Donald Trump over plans to create a $1.776bn “anti-weaponization” fund.The fund, which critics have argued is essentially a slush fund, is set to compensate allies of the US president who he claims were victims of prosecutorial overreach. Continue reading...

  • Jan. 6 officers sue over Trump's $1.8B fund they call a "corrupt sham"

    Axios·Center Left·6 hours ago

    Two law enforcement officers who battled Jan. 6 rioters at the Capitol in 2021 filed a suit Wednesday to dissolve President Trump's $1.8 billion fund for victims of alleged weaponized political prosecutions.Why it matters: Critics have called the taxpayer-funded fund "illegal," but experts say it's unclear who would have legal standing to challenge it in court.What they're saying: Lead plaintiffs, former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, argue the fund is a "corrupt sham" that will compensate Jan. 6 rioters, according to the 29-page lawsuit."In the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century, President Donald J. Trump has created a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded slush fund to finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name."Dunn and Hodges say the fund "endangers" their "lives and safety" in two ways. "First, by its very existence, the Fund encourages those who enacted violence in the President's name to continue to do so. Dunn and Hodges already face credible threats of death and violence on regular basis; the Fund substantially increases the danger.""Second, if allowed to begin making payments, the Fund will directly finance the violent operations of rioters, paramilitaries, and their supporters who threatened Plaintiffs' lives that day, and continue to do so."Catch up quick: Trump created the fund to settle a lawsuit he filed against the IRS after a former contractor released his tax returns to media outlets.Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche will appoint a five-member commission to hear claims of weaponization and determine whether claimants deserve compensation.Blanche previously served as one of Trump's personal attorneys.The intrigue: IRS attorneys reportedly believed they had a strong legal case to fight Trump's lawsuit, but the agency settled anyway, according to the New York Times.Zoom out: Asked Monday whether Jan. 6 rioters could be reimbursed, Trump said the fund is "reimbursing people that were horribly treated.""It's anti-weaponization. They've been weaponized, they've been, in some cases, imprisoned wrongly. They paid legal fees that they didn't have. They've gone bankrupt, their lives have been destroyed, and they turned out to be right," Trump said, presumably referring to his false claim that he won the 2020 presidential election. Vice President Vance also suggested Tuesday that Hunter Biden, the son of former President Biden, could also get money from the fund. "Republicans can apply for it, Democrats can apply for it," he told reporters during a press briefing. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment.Go deeper: Trump DOJ settlement prevents pending tax investigations of president, family

  • Jan. 6 officers sue over $1.8B pot they call ‘slush fund’ for ‘insurrectionists’

    NBC News Politics·Center Left·6 hours ago

    Jan. 6 officers sue over $1.8B pot they call ‘slush fund’ for ‘insurrectionists’

  • Thomas Massie Lost to Donald Trump. He May Still Get the Last Laugh.

    News and Politics - Slate Magazine·Left·17 hours ago

    The Kentucky Republican built a movement of his own, and it's one that's not going away.

  • Trump tightens grip on GOP after Massie’s defeat in Kentucky primary – US politics live

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·18 hours ago

    Republican Congressman defeated by Trump-backed challenger in most expensive House primary in historySign up for the Breaking News US emailOther election results poured in as polls closed in Kentucky, Georgia, Alabama, Pennsylvania, Idaho and Oregon.Among the most notable: US senator Tommy Tuberville won the Republican nomination for Alabama governor, former Atlanta mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms won the Democratic nomination for governor in Georgia and state representative Chris Rabb won the Democratic nomination for Pennsylvania’s third congressional district. Continue reading...

  • Why Thomas Massie Thought He Was Different

    The Atlantic·Center Left·19 hours ago

    He wrongly believed his popularity back home made him able to withstand a Trump-backed challenge.

  • Jan. 6 Police Officers Sue Trump Over His $1.8 Billion Slush Fund

    The New Republic·Left·19 hours ago

    Police officers who defended the Capitol on January 6, 2021, are suing the Trump administration over its creation of a $1.776 billion slush fund for President Trump’s allies who claim they were unfairly targeted.The lawsuit, filed by former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn and current Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges in U.S. District Court, alleges that the fund is illegal and violates the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, which states the government can’t pay debts “incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.” They note that the fund could be used to pay the rioters, and also fund violent organizations.“If allowed to begin making payments, the fund will directly finance the violent operations of rioters, paramilitaries, and their supporters who threatened plaintiffs’ lives that day, and continue to do so,” the officers’ lawyers wrote in the legal filing. “Militias like the Proud Boys will use money from the fund to arm and equip themselves. The fund will grant their [past] acts of violence legal imprimatur.” The plaintiffs are asking for a federal judge to declare the fund unlawful, to block officials from setting it up, and to reverse any payments that have already been made. The lawsuit alleges that creating the fund also broke federal law, as the government can only settle lawsuits after the attorney general declares that such a payment “is in the interest of the United States.”“The payment of $1.776 billion into the Anti-Weaponization Fund to settle Trump v. IRS was patently not ‘in the interest of the United States,’” the lawsuit states. “Rather, it was a misappropriation of taxpayer funds orchestrated by the President to reward his allies and the rioters who committed violence in his name.”It will be interesting to see where this lawsuit goes, and whether it reaches the Supreme Court, which may or may not rule in favor of the president. One hopes that it would see the legal problems with a fund that the president can spend on people who break the law in his name.

  • Trump picks off Massie in Kentucky

    Politics·Center Left·21 hours ago

    The president continues to rack up wins in his revenge tour.

  • Trump critic Thomas Massie defeated in Kentucky Republican House primary

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·21 hours ago

    Victory for Ed Gallrein, former Navy Seal hand-picked by Trump, shows strength of president’s grip on partyMidterms primaries – live updates Donald Trump displayed his supremacy over the Republican party on Tuesday when voters in northern Kentucky rejected the maverick congressman Thomas Massie in favour of the US president’s hand-picked challenger.Ed Gallrein, a retired Navy Seal and farmer who was recruited into the race by Trump, defeated the seven-term incumbent in a primary election in Kentucky’s fourth congressional district in what the president’s allies framed as a test of whether dissent could still exist inside today’s Republican party. Continue reading...

  • Massie loses primary challenge in victory for Trump

    Axios·Center Left·21 hours ago

    Rep. Thomas Massie lost his primary Tuesday against Ed Gallrein, a huge win for President Trump's unprecedented campaign to oust the Kentucky Republican.Why it matters: Massie's loss sends another warning to Republicans about the dangers of crossing Trump, and shows that the president's broader political problems haven't diminished his power with the base.The race was Trump's last, and most important, stop on his revenge tour to oust Republican defectors.Trump's political operation launched an aggressive effort to unseat Massie last year, its first such effort to defeat a sitting Republican incumbent.The fight between Massie and Gallrein was the most expensive House primary in history, drawing more than $32 million in ad spending, according to AdImpact.Driving the news: Trump spent months portraying Massie as disloyal to the MAGA movement. He's called Massie a "moron," a "nut job" and a "major Sleazebag.""We're in a fight against the worst congressman in the history of our country," Trump said in an Oval Office video posted on Truth Social Monday.At a March rally in Massie's district, Trump said: "Give me somebody with a warm body to beat Massie, and I got somebody with a warm body, but a big, beautiful brain, and a great patriot."Gallrein is a farmer and former Navy SEAL officer hand-picked by Trump to challenge Massie.He's unequivocally backed the Trump agenda, saying Monday: "There has never been a more important time to stand behind our president."The other side: Massie contends the White House wants "100% compliance.""I vote with the President 90% of the time. I voted for the SAVE Act. I voted for DHS. In fact, by most scorecards, I'm the most conservative Republican, so it's only the 10% of the time they're mad about," he said.Catch up quick: Massie and Trump's contentious relationship dates back to Trump's first term.In 2020, Massie opposed Trump's COVID relief package, leading the president to call for Massie to be thrown "out of the Republican Party."Massie was also one of only two House Republicans to vote against Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" in 2025. Last summer, Massie sought to repair his relationship with the president, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was able to broker a truce, Axios previously reported.The ceasefire didn't last long. Days later, Massie ramped up his public criticism of the administration's handling of the Epstein files, and later led the push to release the files in defiance of Trump.Between the lines: Trump has taken out a number of Republican politicians who cross him.Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a top target of the president, lost his reelection bid on Saturday when he failed to finish in the top two in the state's GOP primary.Trump also exacted retribution on a group of Indiana Republican state legislators who blocked his push to redraw the state's congressional map.

  • Republicans Panic About the Senate After Trump’s Texas Endorsement

    The New Republic·Left·20 hours ago

    President Trump’s decision to endorse Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate race has left many Republicans fuming.Paxton, Texas’s scandal-plagued attorney general, is in a runoff in the state’s Republican primary against incumbent John Cornyn, who has the support of many of his Senate colleagues. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska reportedly told The Hill that she was “supremely disappointed” by Trump’s endorsement, adding, “I don’t understand it.”Murkowski also said that Republicans will likely have a tougher time retaining the seat against Democratic nominee James Talarico, who is polling very well.“Based on the numbers that I’ve seen, yeah,” Murkowski said, regarding the risk that the GOP will lose the Senate. “How does that help strengthen the president’s hand when we lose a state like Texas?”Senator Susan Collins said that she didn’t understand why Trump endorsed Paxton, calling him an “ethically challenged individual” due to his many scandals, which include defrauding investors in a tech startup and an extramarital affair leading to his wife divorcing him on “biblical grounds.”“John Cornyn is an outstanding senator and deserved in my judgment the president’s support. Obviously it’s the president’s call but I’m disappointed that he did it,” Collins told The Hill.Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who for months tried to lobby Trump to support Cornyn, had a serious expression when reporters asked him Tuesday about the president’s endorsement, only saying, “It’s his decision.” Senator Roger Wicker walked into a lunch meeting with his head bowed and ignored reporters’ questions about the endorsement.“I’m speechless,” Senator Rob Johnson told CNN’s Manu Raju when asked about Trump’s choice, taking a long pause before answering, adding that he “really [had] no comment.”Unlike his colleagues, Senator Lindsey Graham was optimistic, telling Raju that “you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out the pathway for Paxton is there, but it’s more uphill, and it will cost more.”In Trump’s own words, “Ken is a true MAGA Warrior who has ALWAYS delivered for Texas, and will continue to do so in the United States Senate.” In contrast, while Trump said Cornyn is a “good man, and I worked well with him,” the incumbent senator “was not supportive of me when times were tough” and “was very late in backing me in what turned out to be a Historic Run for the Republican Nomination, and then, the Presidency, itself.”If Trump’s endorsement propels Paxton to win in next week’s runoff, Democrats may have a better shot at winning the race, as Paxton’s scandals give him a lot in common with the president. But Texas is a strong Republican state that voted for Trump three times, so nothing is certain.

  • Massie Delivers Trump a Major Warning After His Primary Defeat

    The New Republic·Left·7 hours ago

    Despite losing his primary battle Tuesday night, Representative Thomas Massie came out swinging in his concession speech. The Kentucky congressman came out to chants of “Massie, Massie!” from his supporters, and referenced AIPAC’s backing of his Trump-endorsed opponent, Ed Gallrein. “I would’ve come out sooner, but I had to call my opponent and concede, and it took a while to find Ed Gallrein in Tel Aviv,” Massie quipped. “I did get the call through though, I have called and conceded the race. We’ve been honorable the whole time, and we’re gonna stay that way.” Massie: I would have come out sooner but I had to call my opponent to concede and it took a while to find him in Tel Aviv pic.twitter.com/DmTkDfS17a— Acyn (@Acyn) May 20, 2026Massie drew the ire of the president after breaking with him on key issues, including aid to Israel, the war in Iran, and perhaps most notable of all, the Epstein files. Trump attacked Massie relentlessly and practically campaigned in his backyard, but the congressman didn’t let up on his stances. Despite his loss, Massie vowed to press on in his final seven months on the job. “By the way, today is the six-month anniversary of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. We’ve taken out two dozen CEOs, an ambassador, a prince, a prime minister, a minister of culture, and that was just six months. I’ve got seven months left in Congress,” Massie said as the crowd began chanting his name. Massie: Today is the six-month anniversary of the Epstein Transparency Act. We’ve taken out two dozen CEOs, an ambassador, a prince, a prime minister, a minister of culture—that was just six months. I’ve got seven months left in Congress. pic.twitter.com/sm1nAOBVO6— Acyn (@Acyn) May 20, 2026

  • Trump’s allies in danger of scraping false hope from Maga victory in Kentucky primary

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·9 hours ago

    US president, like a cult leader whose commune keeps getting smaller, commands fierce loyalty from a shrinking base“Thomas Massie caught in a throuple!” screamed the AI-generated attack ad that showed the Republican congressman supposedly dining with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar then checking into a hotel with the two progressives. “Thomas Massie betrayed President Trump!” it added.Crude but effective, as it turns out. Massie, from northern Kentucky, lost the most expensive House of Representatives primary election in history on Tuesday to Ed Gallrein, a farmer and former US Navy Seal backed by Donald Trump. Continue reading...

  • Thomas Massie Loses His Seat in a Win for Trump — and AIPAC

    The Intercept·Far Left·1 days ago

    The race was widely viewed as a referendum on the president. It was also a test of the pro-Israel lobby's power. The post Thomas Massie Loses His Seat in a Win for Trump — and AIPAC appeared first on The Intercept.

  • Longtime MAGA voter says he’s voting 'against Trump' in GOP primary

    Alternet.org·Left·1 days ago

    There are several elections on Tuesday in the U.S., but one major one is a Kentucky House race that has proven to be the most costly in history ($32 million). On the ground, Republicans are voting on whether to retain Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been a thorn in the side of President Donald Trump in the past year. One MAGA voter was all in on Massie, despite their feud. CNN national affairs correspondent Jeff Zeleny said that the election is for Massie, but it might as well be about Trump. "It's a loyalty test for President Trump. And Thomas Massie has long been on the list of the White House as the top Republican who infuriates the president more than anyone else," said Zeleny. "Why is that? Of course, Thomas Massie led the charge to release the [Jeffrey] Epstein files. He has also voted against some key pieces of legislation, and he's been a critic of the Iraq War. Otherwise, he largely votes the conservative line. There's no doubt that Massie has a contrarian libertarian streak. That is one of the things that voters here say they like about him a lot, actually."Trump, on the other hand, is "fixated" on Massie, Zeleny continued. He's been willing to throw as much money as necessary to go after Massie and tear him down. "But as we've been talking to voters here in northern Kentucky, they're viewing this race through a different lens," he explained. Kentucky voter Rob Barkley said he voted for Trump in 2016 but didn't support him recently. Now that it has come between Trump or Massie, Barkley said he's against Trump. "I voted for Massie because he's pretty much against — he's on the Republican side. So he does have a conservative mindset, but he's not as far leaning right as the trump politics and basically a voting against Trump, honestly," the GOP voter said. "You voted against Trump?" Zeleny asked."I did not vote for Trump in the previous election. I voted for him the first time, and then I went against him the second time. But on this one, it's predominantly around just his — the stuff he does," said Barkley.

  • Donald Trump is not coming back from this

    Alternet.org·Left·10 hours ago

    Donald Trump’s rapid descent into his own special hell is gaining speed. This hulking, demented racist conman will eventually land with a thud, with only the billions in cold, hard cash he has drained from the American taxpayer to cushion his collapse.Our standing on the world stage has taken a hit we might never recover from. We have no allies, only old neighbors who are watching in disbelief as the big, old white house on the block burns out of control. Our air and water is getting dirtier by the hour, and food prices are higher every time we wander into a store. Women have less rights than they did 50 years ago, and the Jim Crow South is back. Our government has been dismantled by greedy, billionaire Orcs, so that it works exclusively for them and not us.America has never been worse off, and that is the best we could have hoped for following that ghastly election in November, 2024, which handed Republicans the Executive, the Court, the House and the Senate.Because it actually could have been worse …In the worst-case scenario, Trump would have been an incoherent madman able to rein in his worst instincts as a subhuman, and worked diligently to at least give the phony appearance he was doing all he could to keep prices under control, and America out of any asinine wars.He would have worked quietly behind the scenes raking in cash to ruin us at the behest of those billionaire Orcs, and most Americans wouldn’t have been the wiser. As we have painfully learned over the past decade there are more than enough shallow people in America who are willing to go along with almost any abomination — including the caging of children — just as long as the gasoline they are pumping into their hulking vehicles is as cheap as they are.Under this worst-case scenario enough Americans would have gone along with Trump’s very worst, because somehow they would have continued to believe the fantasy that their lives would improve, even if every metric told them otherwise.Republicans’ chances going into midterms would be decent. There would be no talk of Democrats taking back the Senate, and plenty of predictions that Republicans would actually increase their advantage.Troops would be in the streets just in case.Three-dollar gas can mask a world of hurt in America.Well, that worst-case scenario didn’t come to pass, and there are signs everywhere that upwards of 70 percent of Americans do not like what is happening in their country right now. Whether that matters or if it is too late is still up for debate, but at this moment, America still has a shot to save itself in the nick of time.A New York Times/Siena poll released Monday has Trump’s approval rating at 37 percent, which is the lowest number in that paper’s polling since Trump hulked on the scene in 2016.Under the headline: Trump’s Approval Sinks Amid Unpopular War, Darkening GOP Prospects the case is made by the paper that …“… no president’s approval rating has been under 38 percent for more than a few days in the last 17 years. If there has been a floor during this partisan era of politics, Trump’s ratings today have fallen to it.”Adding …“The most immediate political consequences is that Democrats appear increasingly well positioned for the midterm elections in November. The poll shows Democrats have a double-digit lead, 50 percent to 39 percent, when registered voters are asked which party’s candidate they’ll support for Congress.” If you are one of those people saying right now that it is insane his approvals are that high, I will readily agree, but one of us hasn’t been paying attention to the past decade during which America has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it isn’t even a good country, much less a great one ...Under this best-case scenario we simply must accept that historically low approvals is the best we can hope for as we steam toward the latest most-important elections of our lives in November.The NYT poll mirrors an NPR poll two weeks ago that I typed about extensively. From that story:More than 80% of Americans say pain at the pump is straining their household budgets and a striking majority blames the president, according to a NPR/PBS News/Marist poll. The poll found that President Trump faces his lowest popularity ever and is experiencing major declines with key demographics since being sworn in for his second term. Most Americans said the economy isn’t working for them. The war in Iran — which has directly led to higher gas prices — is increasingly unpopular. Those challenges have given Democrats a distinct advantage in the midterm elections.

  • Democrats Decry Trump’s $1.8 Billion “Slush Fund to Reward His Own Allies

    Truthout·Far Left·1 days ago

    Sen. Chuck Schumer called the plan “one of the most depraved” uses by Trump of the Justice Department.

  • Conservative National Review slams Trump’s $1.7 billion 'slush fund'

    Alternet.org·Left·1 days ago

    When President Donald Trump and his allies dropped their $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), there was a condition: the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) would create a $1.7 billion fund to settle claims by people who say they were wrongly targeted for "lawfare" during Joe Biden's presidency.Democrats on Capitol Hill are attacking the fund as a "slush fund," but Democrats aren't the only ones speaking out. The conservative National Review's editors are vehemently critical of the fund in a blistering editorial."Donald Trump has dropped his $10 billion damages lawsuit against the IRS," the Review editors write. "What he's doing instead may be even worse…. Immediately on the heels of the dismissal of the IRS suit, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that, as part of a deal to settle that case, DOJ is creating an 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' of $1.776 billion. This is reportedly designed to establish 'a systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare' under Joe Biden, potentially including defendants in January 6 prosecutions."The conservative Review editors continue, "Blanche's letter explains that the obviously symbolic $1.776 billion figure 'does not represent the value of any claim by Plaintiffs, but rather is based on the projected valuation of future claimants' claims.' Tellingly, the new fund is designed to expire 'no later than December 1, 2028,' so all the money will be dispensed by the current administration."The Review editors go onto argue that "hard-to-supervise slush funds aimed at financing well-connected political allies are exactly the sort of thing a populist presidency is supposed to end.""It also represents a favored tactic of the left: gain control of an institution, 'apologize' for what its former leaders did, and use the apology as an excuse to loot the Treasury to pay 'reparations,'" the editors write. "That's no more justifiable when the right does it. This may be legal, in the sense that Congress created and funds a permanent Judgment Fund for settling lawsuits against the United States, rather than requiring such settlements to gain case-by-case legislative approval, as was true in the early republic. But there is also nothing in the Constitution that requires Congress to passively let this sort of thing happen."

  • Trump gets revenge as Thomas Massie projected to lose primary to MAGA ex-Navy SEAL

    Raw Story·Far Left·1 days ago

    In a banner race closely watched around the country, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) was defeated for re-nomination to Kentucky's 4th Congressional District on Tuesday evening, losing to Donald Trump-endorsed former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein.The race was projected Tuesday night by NBC News, Decision Desk HQ and CNN.Massie, a libertarian-leaning Republican with a history of idiosyncratic beliefs and votes against his party on major issues, gained national prominence as one of the co-authors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which compelled the release of files on one of the nation's most infamous serial child trafficking cases — largely over opposition from Trump.The primary campaign swiftly grew into an ugly spectacle, with groups supporting both sides lobbing vicious and sometimes antisemitic attacks on each other.

  • First, a $1.8 Billion Slush Fund. Now Trump Aims to Weasel Out of IRS Audits “Forever”

    Mother Jones·Left·1 days ago

    A new addendum to the so-called settlement agreement between Trump and Trump—that is, the Department of Justice and Donald Trump’s personal lawyers—will “forever” prohibit the United States from seeking any claim or initiating any IRS enforcement action or audit against Donald Trump, his sons Eric and Don Jr., and the Trump Organization, based on any […]

  • Todd Blanche among Trump officials hit with subpoena motion over slush fund

    Raw Story·Far Left·8 hours ago

    House Democrats have quickly stepped up their pressure on officials involved in setting up President Donald Trump's massive fund to pay off allies who say they were politically targeted by previous administrations.Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the top-ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, moved to subpoena acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other administration officials involved in establishing the $1.776 "Anti-Weaponization Fund," reported MeidasTouch correspondent Scott MacFarlane."GOP has sufficient votes to block it," MacFarlane noted. "But it’s not a favorable vote politically."Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) agreed to hold a vote at the end of Wednesday's hearing.Raskin additionally sought to subpoena IRS CEO Frank Bisignano and Treasury General Counsel Brian Morrissey to question them about the fund.The Maryland Democrat also notified Bessent, Blanche and Bisignano that he and Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal (D-MA) would be seeking documents and other evidence related to the fund."The American people and the world just witnessed one of the most brazen acts of public corruption and self-dealing in American history," Raskin and Neal stated a letter sent to the Trump administration officials Wednesday.

  • Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Is Worse Than Stealing

    The Atlantic·Center Left·1 days ago

    Recasting the January 6 insurrection as the work of heroic patriots remains the president’s highest priority.

  • Top Treasury Lawyer Quits as Trump Creates $1.8 Billion Slush Fund

    The New Republic·Left·1 days ago

    The U.S. Treasury’s highest-ranking lawyer quit just hours after President Trump announced his “Anti-Weaponization Fund”—a brazen attempt to dole out $1.8 billion of taxpayer money to his allies, supporters, and himself.Treasury General Counsel Brian Morrissey resigned shortly after the fund was approved on Monday, according to The New York Times. Morrisey has yet to publicly comment. He served for only seven months.The fund—created by Trump in exchange for dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS—allows anyone who feels they were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration to seek damages. This includes, but is not limited to, January 6 rioters, right-wing think tanks, and the president’s own super PAC. While Trump claims he “wasn’t involved in the whole creation of it,” he controls who sits on the board of the fund.There’s also a massive disclaimer that states that once the funds are disbursed, his administration has “no liability whatsoever for the protection or safeguarding of those funds, regardless of bank failure, fraudulent transfers, or any other fraud or misuse.” The move preemptively dodges any future legal issues that may arise from awarding funds to people who went to jail for assault and sedition (and have committed other crimes since).The outcry has been swift and widespread, with Senator Elizabeth Warren calling the slush fund an “insane level of corruption—even for Trump.” California Governor Gavin Newsom said it was “waste, fraud, and abuse in the flesh.” Maybe those same feelings about this blatant self-enrichment scheme got to Morrissey.

  • Trump’s Push to Defeat Thomas Massie Is the Most Expensive House Primary in Recent Years

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·2 days ago

    The Republican primary in Representative Thomas Massie’s district has drawn vast spending, but it is just one of several contests on Tuesday that will test the power of big money.

  • Trump wanders out of White House to give free-wheeling rant in front ballroom construction

    Raw Story·Far Left·1 days ago

    President Donald Trump stepped outside the White House on Tuesday to survey the sprawling construction site where his prized ballroom is rising from the rubble of the demolished East Wing — and delivered a lengthy, freewheeling tour that touched on drone warfare, Greek architecture, and his place in history."This is my gift to the United States of America," Trump told reporters as he gestured at the concrete skeleton taking shape on the White House grounds. "I'm going to be able to use it very little. When it's finished, we're talking about six or seven months. But it will be used for hopefully hundreds of years by other presidents."Trump's remarks ranged across the building's classical facade ("This is Rome. They like the flat roof. Greece likes the triangles"), its four-inch-thick bulletproof glass, and its "dead flat roof" — designed, he said, specifically to serve as a military drone port. "It's built for our snipers," he added, "not the enemy's snipers."The president also took a swipe at a federal judge who has repeatedly tried to halt construction. "We have a judge that thinks it's a terrible thing that we're making a gift," Trump said. "He said it's terrible — that it should be paid for by the taxpayer. That's something I've never heard before."The ballroom, now projected to cost $400 million and set to open around September 2028, has been a near-daily obsession for the president. Trump has publicly highlighted the ballroom project on roughly a third of all days this year — and it shows no sign of slowing down.When a reporter pressed Trump on why Congress was being asked to weigh in if the project is privately funded, he acknowledged the tension — barely. "Congress is approving money for security," he said. "It may go — some of it may go here for additional security. I don't know."That's something of an understatement. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has introduced legislation including $1 billion earmarked for security improvements accompanying the ballroom project — a far cry from Trump's repeated vow that "not one penny" of taxpayer money would be spent.The project has been dogged by legal challenges, design mockery from architects, and polls showing Americans oppose it 2-to-1. A YouGov survey found that 61% of U.S. adults did not approve of the construction, and the National Capital Planning Commission received over 32,000 public comments, overwhelmingly opposing it — some comparing its aesthetics to a "Vegas casino."None of that appeared to dampen Trump's enthusiasm on Tuesday."There will never be anything like this built again," he said. "There will never be a roof built with this kind of safety."

  • What to Know About the DOJ’s $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' That Could Compensate Trump Allies Investigated Under Biden

    TIME·Center Left·2 days ago

    The creation of the fund, which could be used to compensate Trump allies investigated under Biden, is part of deal to resolve the President's lawsuit against the IRS.

  • Senate majority leader signals tough road ahead for Trump’s $1.7 billion slush fund

    Alternet.org·Left·2 days ago

    Much of the criticism of President Donald Trump's $1.7 billion "weaponization fund" is coming from Democrats, who are attacking it as a "slush fund." But some conservatives are speaking out as well — including Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota), who is saying he's "not a big fan" of the fund. After Trump and his allies dropped their $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), they did so on the condition that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) would set up a $1.7 billion fund to help people who, MAGA Republicans claim, were wrongly targeted for "lawfare" under former President Joe Biden and ex-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.According to The Hill's Alexander Bolton, Thune said of the fund, "Not a big fan. I'm not exactly sure how they would use it but my understanding is that was just announced. But yeah, I don't see a purpose."On the right, the fund is also drawing criticism from the conservative National Review's editorial board — which used much stronger language in a scathing editorial published on May 19.The Review editors argued that "hard-to-supervise slush funds aimed at financing well-connected political allies are exactly the sort of thing a populist presidency is supposed to end."Trump is claiming that Biden used the DOJ to target his political enemies, and he is describing the "anti-weaponization fund" as a way to help them out.

  • Trump doesn’t grasp how much 'blow back' DOJ’s 'slush fund' will get: White House insiders

    Alternet.org·Left·2 days ago

    The Justice Department announced that it would set up a fund for people claim they have been "wronged" by former President Joe Biden's administration. The fund comes as President Donald Trump dropped his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS after a contractor leaked his tax records showing he wasn't as successful as he claimed in 2016.On Monday, Trump announced he would drop the case and the DOJ would set up a new $1.776 billion fund. Currently, there is a fund set up for those who win certain lawsuits against the U.S. government, but in those cases, the petitioners won a lawsuit. In this case, a fund is being set up for those who haven't taken their cases to court. The order to open the fund was signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously represented Trump in his lawsuits that he has claimed were a result of "weaponization."Reporting on the matter on Monday, CNN legal reporter Paula Reid noted that the DOJ says there's no "partisan requirement" to get money from the fund, "but it's clear who the target audience is."She pointed out that it's an effort to "enrich their allies.""But I also don't think they really understand how little the average person cares and how much blow back they are going to face now that they are using taxpayer money to enrich the president and his allies," said Reid."Have we ever seen anything like this in the history of our country?" CNN host Dana Bash asked. "No. I want to know, first of all, that the people at the negotiating table were President Trump's personal lawyers and lawyers from the White House, the Justice Department, and the IRS, all part of his administration. There was no outside voice," Reid said. "Now, the president's team — they continue to point to what they say is a similar fund that was established under the Obama administration. This was the Keepseagle fund."The fund in that case, she explained, was smaller and stems from the case Keepseagle v. Vilsack, in which farmers and ranchers from across the U.S. joined a class-action lawsuit alleging the Department of Agriculture discriminated against Native American farmers in the farm loan programs between 1981 and 1999. In 2011, a settlement was agreed upon in which "Track A" victims got up to $50,000 and "Track B" victims were given up to $250,000 for documented discrimination cases. Leftover funds were then used to create the Native American Agriculture Fund (NAAF), a trust that would help with Native American agricultural education. In 2018, during Trump's term, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal by two objectors to review the settlement. The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit approved the distribution plan in 2016. It was 17 years after the lawsuit was filed. Reid predicted that Trump's fund was likely to have a "lot of litigation" around it.

  • Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Comes With Huge Disclaimer

    The New Republic·Left·2 days ago

    President Trump’s newly minted MAGA slush fund comes with a massive disclaimer that serves to absolve the administration of any future crimes their allies may commit with the taxpayer money. The “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” approved Monday, contains roughly $1.8 billion for anyone who felt unfairly targeted by the Biden administration— from January 6 rioters, to right-wing think tanks, to the president’s own super PAC. The fund also notes that once these groups have received their money the Trump administration has “no liability whatsoever for the protection or safeguarding of those funds, regardless of bank failure, fraudulent transfers, or any other fraud or misuse of the funds.” This disclaimer allows Trump to wash his hands preemptively while this billion dollar fund will very well likely go to folks who were convicted of unlawful entry, assault, and seditious conspiracy. And some of those people have already committed crimes since they received their mass pardon from Trump. “[This] seems like an exceptionally bad idea to give to people notoriously known for committing crimes,” the Ways and Means Committee Democrats wrote on X.

  • “Highway robbery”: Dems accuse Trump of creating $1.7 billion “slush fund” for Jan. 6 defendants

    Salon.com·Left·2 days ago

    Democrats claim the DOJ has created a scheme to pay out Jan. 6 rioters and Trump allies in IRS lawsuit settlement

  • Trump drops $10 billion lawsuit against IRS

    Axios·Center Left·2 days ago

    President Trump, his two eldest sons and the Trump Organization voluntarily dismissed their $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and Treasury Department on Monday, according to a filing in a Miami federal court.Why it matters: The dismissal comes as Trump has reportedly considered launching a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded compensation fund for those who claim they were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration, including Jan. 6 defendants.Multiple news outlets reported Trump was considering launching the nearly $1.8 billion fund as part of the talks to resolve his lawsuit.Catch up quick: Trump sued the IRS after a former contractor leaked his confidential tax returns to The New York Times and ProPublica during his first term. The contractor pled guilty and was sentenced to federal prison.The filing says the case was dismissed "with prejudice," which means Trump can't refile it.The unusual case featured Trump demanding pay from the very agencies he oversees as president. Editor's note: This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

  • What is Trump’s $1.776 Billion ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund?

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·2 days ago

    The Trump administration is creating a $1.8 billion fund to compensate people it says were wronged by the federal government, a group that could be largely made up of the president’s allies.

  • Longtime Trump ally Michael Caputo files first known claim for ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

    NBC News Politics·Center Left·5 hours ago

    The former Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson filed the claim a day after the Justice Department set up the nearly $1.8 billion fund.

  • Trump news at a glance: Republicans pledge to secure funding for White House ballroom

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·2 days ago

    Senate parliamentarian ruled a proposal to fund $1bn in security additions for the White House failed to meet procedural rules. Key US politics stories from Sunday 17 May 2026 at a glanceA US Senate official on Saturday removed security funding that could be used for Donald Trump’s planned $400m White House ballroom from a massive spending package, Democratic lawmakers said, imperilling Republican efforts to devote taxpayer money to the contentious project.The decision by the Senate’s parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, deals a blow to Trump and his administration, which has sought the money for security purposes related to the ballroom. Continue reading...

  • 'This is a criminal act': DOJ's $1.776 billion 'slush fund' protested as 'blatant theft'

    Raw Story·Far Left·2 days ago

    The Department of Justice announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund of taxpayer money that would be used to pay off President Donald Trump's allies, including Jan. 6 rioters, who say they were politically targeted by previous administrations.The 79-year-old president, his two elder sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and the family-owned Trump Organization agreed to drop their $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service in exchange for the establishment of the taxpayer-funded payouts, which will have little oversight or transparency.The president and his sons say the IRS and the Treasury Department failed to stop a former employee from leaking their tax returns, but a judge overseeing the case gave the administration until Wednesday to explain “whether a case or controversy exists" after questioning why the court should weigh since Trump controls the Justice Department.Trump's personal lawyers argued Monday in a filing the court did not need to weigh in because they were voluntarily agreeing to dismiss the case, and the administration never replied to the suit.The terms of the settlement sparked outrage across social media."Democrats should be saying anybody who takes this stolen money will see the government coming after them to claw it back," demanded election law expert Andy Craig."As Jamie Raskin also tells me here, if Dems take back one or both chambers of Congress, they will shut down the slush fund, and use oversight power to compel release of a list of any/all payments made between now and 2027," reported The New Republic's Greg Sargent. "So Trump can't necessarily hide these payments forever.""The largest federal reparations fund in US history goes not to indigenous tribes or descendants of formerly enslaved people or interned Japanese-Americans — but to J6ers who smeared s--- on the walls of the US Capitol and attempted to hang the Vice President," seethed meteorologist and climate journalist Eric Holthaus."So you CAN get reparations you just have to be a reactionary white person who tries to overthrow the government because black votes shouldn’t count," noted writer Adam Serwer."I’ll be interested (and horrified) to see how much actually goes to violent J6ers as opposed to those who are already rich, powerful, and aggrieved, with 'lawfare' defined as friends of Trump prosecuted for tax fraud and domestic violence," pondered writer Jeff Sharlet."A lot of people are talking about the $1.8 billion slush fund as though it's going to Jan 6ers. Is this established somewhere? I would imagine it's more likely to go to Trump's family and allies who claim that criminal probes/sentences were political," agreed journalist Philip Bump."This is THEFT. There is no other word for it," denounced Aaron Reichlin-Melnick. "They are stealing almost $1.8 BILLION dollars to pay Trump‘s allies, despite knowing that these people are not legally entitled to any money and be laughed out of court if they filed a lawsuit for money damages. It is my personal opinion that this is a criminal act and people should respond accordingly.""Can the law firms and universities targeted by the current administration apply for these funds?" wondered pollster Kevin Collins."The corruption and incompetence knows no bounds," marveled Bluesky user Hari Seldon. "If there had not been push-back, this would have ended in a self-payoff, aka: blatant theft.""$1.7 billion is about to be paid out of the pockets of US taxpayers to J6 criminals who beat cops and Trump’s other dirty henchmen," decried MeidasNews editor in chief Ron Filipkowski. "Trump set up a slush fund to reward these scumbags with your money and Republicans in Congress won’t say a word about this disgusting corruption."

  • 5 things to know as new details emerge about deadly shooting at San Diego Islamic Center

    Raw Story·Far Left·2 days ago

    Two suspects and three victims have died at a shooting at the San Diego Islamic Center on Monday as more details emerged. Investigators shared additional information about the shooting at 7050 Eckstrom Ave, just west of the 805 Freeway.Here are five things to know about the fatal shooting.1. Two suspects, who died of self-inflicted gunshots and were found in a vehicle near the mosque, were reportedly teenagers. They were believed to be ages 17 and 19, according to the FBI. Their names were not immediately released. It's unclear what motivated the shooting.CNN analyst Josh Campbell described the involvement of two shooters as "unusual."2. A security guard killed in the shooting was "pivotal" in preventing further deaths or harm.“One of the deceased is a security guard that works there and I think played a pivotal role in assisting from this being much worse,” San Diego Police Department Chief Scott Wahl told reporters.The security guard's name was not immediately released. It appears this guard prevented people from entering the location where a group of children was located. No children were hurt. Children were seen in footage holding hands and escorting the site.The suspects also shot at a gardener. The gardener was not injured, according to authorities.3. The FBI was investigating the incident as a hate crime. No known motive was immediately released. Authorities said they would investigate the incident as a hate crime until it's determined that it's not because it's a place of worship. 4. The location of the shooting is the largest Islamic center in San Diego. The mosque is about 9 miles north of San Diego and is the largest mosque in San Diego County, according to The Associated Press.5. Authorities were asking the public to contact them with additional information and tips. Anyone with information can visit at fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI to report any information about the incident.

  • Trump to tear down the iconic White House South Lawn, reports WSJ

    Raw Story·Far Left·2 days ago

    President Donald Trump plans to dig up the South Lawn and install a permanent helipad, marking the latest in a series of extensive White House renovations. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Trump has already paved over the Rose Garden, installed black granite walkways, redesigned the Oval Office, added flagpoles, and demolished the East Wing to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom. And now, the President is justifying the helipad by citing the new VH-92A Patriot helicopter's exhaust, which can burn grass in hot conditions and is 6,200 pounds heavier than the aging VH-3D Sea King it replaces. Officials have known about potential lawn damage since a 2018 Government Accountability Office report. Rather than modify the aircraft, Trump —a former developer— is proposing to rip up the iconic lawn. The South Lawn serves as a backdrop for Easter Egg Rolls and state arrivals.Trump also plans to permanently install a helipad at Mar-a-Lago, with potential taxpayer-funded infrastructure benefiting his private club. The Palm Beach town council is now evaluating the request — submitted by the U.S. Secret Service.Watch the video below. Your browser does not support the video tag.

  • House Republican gives Trump 'bad news' and vows to 'kill' his fund to pay off MAGA allies

    Raw Story·Far Left·2 hours ago

    A Republican fired off a strong criticism of President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded anti-weaponization fund, saying he and other lawmakers have plans to fight back against it.In an interview with MeidasTouch chief Washington correspondent Scott MacFarlane on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) said legislative action would be underway after Trump's Department of Justice this week announced the fund, which was created by part of a settlement of Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS."Bad news. We’re gonna kill try to kill it," Fitzpatrick said."We're considering legislative options, we're going to write a letter to the AG to start. But we're considering a legislative option," Fitzpatrick said, explaining that congressional leaders were preparing the fight against it and looking into the legal options.He also said he had never heard of any Americans proclaiming they were no longer subject to audits by the IRS, which was what Trump had declared on Tuesday in a new order."You can't do that," he added.This doesn’t bode well for Trump’s $1.7 billion fund for convicted crooks and rioters:Rep Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): “we’re gonna kill it” pic.twitter.com/usZ4bNBeOM— Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) May 20, 2026

  • 5 Things to Know About Thomas Massie, Republican House Candidate in Kentucky

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·20 hours ago

    Mr. Massie lost to a primary challenger backed by President Trump.

  • Trump news at a glance: president forces out another Republican who crossed him

    US news | The Guardian·Center Left·20 hours ago

    Thomas Massie, who repeatedly broke with Trump, lost to retired Navy Seal Ed Gallrein who was recruited into the race by the president. Key US politics stories from Tuesday 19 May at a glanceDonald Trump displayed his supremacy over the Republican party on Tuesday when voters in northern Kentucky rejected the maverick congressman Thomas Massie in favour of the US president’s hand-picked challenger.Ed Gallrein, a retired Navy Seal and farmer who was recruited into the race by Trump, defeated the seven-term incumbent in a primary election in Kentucky’s fourth congressional district, in what the president’s allies framed as a test of whether dissent could still exist inside today’s Republican party. Continue reading...

  • Thomas Massie Loses Kentucky House Primary to Trump-Backed Ed Gallrein

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·20 hours ago

    Representative Thomas Massie, President Trump’s chief G.O.P. antagonist in the House, lost to Ed Gallrein, Mr. Trump’s handpicked candidate.

  • What to Know About House Primaries as Massie Faces Trump-Backed Challenger in Kentucky

    NYT > U.S. > Politics·Center Left·20 hours ago

    In Kentucky, Thomas Massie is fighting off a Trump-backed challenger. Democrats in Pennsylvania have a big decision to make.

  • Trump-endorsed Ed Gallrein unseats Rep. Thomas Massie in Kentucky GOP primary

    NBC News Politics·Center Left·20 hours ago

    Former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein has won the Republican primary in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District over Rep. Thomas Massie.

  • Explore More Perspectives

    🔥 Top News🕒 Latest NewsLeft SourcesCenter SourcesRight SourcesThe Parallax PulseAbout Parallax News