The Court ruled that local goverments may pay compensation far below fair market value for property seized in tax foreclosures.
The Pung family of Isabella County, Michigan, maintained they were entitled to fair market value. The high court disagreed, but with a twist.
Brad Lander defeats Rep. Dan Goldman in the NY-10 Democratic primary, backed by Bernie Sanders and Mayor Mamdani in a progressive wing victory.
A Brooklyn coffee shop told Democratic New York Rep. Dan Goldman not to come back to the business because it does not serve “racists, fascists, homophobes, genocide […]
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and key allies secured major wins in Tuesday’s congressional primaries, as they looked to build on the mayor’s 2025 victory by expanding the democratic socialist movement’s power and presence in Washington.
A "disturbing" Supreme Court ruling will allow border officials to subject green-card holders to a "Kafkaesque nightmare," per a Slate analysis.According to the analysis by legal reporter Mark Joseph Stern, the 6-3 Supreme Court vote along usual partisan lines in the case Blanche v. Lau established that border officials don't need "clear and convincing evidence" that green-card holders committed a "crime of moral turpitude" to deny them entry.The case originates from a lawful permanent resident named Muk Choi Lau, who lost his green card and was paroled into the U.S. after he was accused of selling designer-style shorts with a counterfeit trademark, Stern wrote. Lau argued that the border official shouldn't be able to take his green card and have so much discretion.Although a lower court agreed with Lau, the Supreme Court tossed that decision with a ruling that Stern described as "egregiously wrong."Lau was allowed into the United States on parole, but that status puts an immigrant in "legal limbo" and makes them "far more vulnerable to deportation."Stern brought up Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissenting opinion and echoed her point that by taking a legal permanent resident's green card, it can make it harder for them "to work, open bank accounts, secure housing, obtain health insurance, and enroll in school."Meanwhile, Stern called out Justice Clarence Thomas's opinion, saying it "blesses one part of the Trump administration's multipronged attack against green-card holders, validating its campaign to revoke these individuals' rights on a whim," and highlighted that Thomas "expressly declined to say what, if any, burden the government bears at the border."
A federal appeals court on Tuesday sided with Trump and ruled that ICE may resume swift deportations. The post Federal Appeals Court Bats Down Biden Judge, Sides with Trump, Says ICE Can Resume Swift Deportations appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
A federal appeals court gave the Trump administration the green light to resume its fast-track removal of illegal aliens throughout the United States on Tuesday. In a 2-1 ruling, the three-judge panel for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned an August 2025 decision by Biden-appointed D.C. District Judge Jia Cobb. That ruling attempted to […]