Mullin testimony doesn't "close the gap" on DHS shutdown

Source: Axios · Bias: Center Left

Summary

Plenty of heat and personal vitriol came out in Sen. Markwayne Mullin's (R-Okla.) hearing to lead the Department of Homeland Security.But little light came through on how to end the DHS shutdown.Why it matters: After weeks of negotiations — and the firing of a Cabinet official — Democrats remain dug in on demands for statutory changes to ICE and Border Patrol.Mullin's testimony didn't alter that dynamic. "I don't think his nomination increases the likelihood of a compromise, because he stood pretty firm against the kinds of reforms that Americans are demanding," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), told Axios. That's despite Mullin drifting toward the Democrats' direction, signaling openness to requiring judicial warrants for federal immigration agents to enter private homes or businesses.Still, Democrats told Axios they were unmoved, insisting those concessions must come through legislation — not agency discretion."They refuse to do that, and you will understand if that raises our antenna," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a member of Senate Democratic leadership, told reporters Wednesday."It's a good thing if he's recognizing legal reality, but that's not going to close the gap," said Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.).Zoom out: Democrats continue to argue the problem is bigger than Mullin — or any personnel change at DHS.They want reforms that cannot be undone by President Trump, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller or future Cabinet officials."We're asking to do all of the things that Mullin is saying he's willing to do, except in a way that doesn't depend on the whims of the president or Stephen Miller or Markwayne Mullin," Schatz said.Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), an Appropriations Committee member, said he has "no confidence" that Mullin would change administration policy.The bottom line: Mullin signaled openness to policy shifts at DHS, but his hearing was defined by a chair's implacable opposition — and Democrats' refusal to fund ICE without legislative guarantees.

Related Coverage

Daily Analysis

Read the full Parallax Pulse for March 19, 2026 — an AI-powered analysis of how Left and Right media covered the biggest stories this day.

More Headlines From March 19, 2026

arallaxNews.io
Mullin testimony doesn't "close the gap" on DHS shutdown
Axios

Mullin testimony doesn't "close the gap" on DHS shutdown

Center Left

Plenty of heat and personal vitriol came out in Sen. Markwayne Mullin's (R-Okla.) hearing to lead the Department of Homeland Security.But little light came through on how to end the DHS shutdown.Why it matters: After weeks of negotiations — and the firing of a Cabinet official — Democrats remain dug in on demands for statutory changes to ICE and Border Patrol.Mullin's testimony didn't alter that dynamic. "I don't think his nomination increases the likelihood of a compromise, because he stood pretty firm against the kinds of reforms that Americans are demanding," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), told Axios. That's despite Mullin drifting toward the Democrats' direction, signaling openness to requiring judicial warrants for federal immigration agents to enter private homes or businesses.Still, Democrats told Axios they were unmoved, insisting those concessions must come through legislation — not agency discretion."They refuse to do that, and you will understand if that raises our antenna," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a member of Senate Democratic leadership, told reporters Wednesday."It's a good thing if he's recognizing legal reality, but that's not going to close the gap," said Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.).Zoom out: Democrats continue to argue the problem is bigger than Mullin — or any personnel change at DHS.They want reforms that cannot be undone by President Trump, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller or future Cabinet officials."We're asking to do all of the things that Mullin is saying he's willing to do, except in a way that doesn't depend on the whims of the president or Stephen Miller or Markwayne Mullin," Schatz said.Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), an Appropriations Committee member, said he has "no confidence" that Mullin would change administration policy.The bottom line: Mullin signaled openness to policy shifts at DHS, but his hearing was defined by a chair's implacable opposition — and Democrats' refusal to fund ICE without legislative guarantees.

Read Full Story at Source