Virginia Court: We Can’t Say Whether Dems’ Gerrymandering Is Illegal Until After They Try It
Source: The Federalist · Bias: Far Right
Summary
The judge ruled that the constitutional questions about the election needed to be answered after votes were cast.
Related Coverage
- 'Demon in human skin!' Fox News host loses it as Dem threatens to upend Texas Senate race (Far Left — Raw Story)
- When Teen Chaos Meets a Country Afraid to Say No (Right — PJ Media)
- Trump Scores Appeals Court Victory in Battle Over National Park Historical Displays (Right — RedState)
- Penn Dems boot GOP Rep from House floor for patriotic suit despite encouraging ‘Pride’ attire (Far Right — BizPac Review)
- Wes Moore: Trump on July 4 has ‘tried to make this moment about him’ (Center — The Hill News)
- Lawfare: Kangaroo court picks fight with state’s conservative attorney general (Far Right — WorldNetDaily)
- UPDATE: Louisiana Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Politically Motivated Indictment Against AG Liz Murrill (Far Right — The Gateway Pundit)
- Europe Has Replaced Most US Cuts Within NATO, Top Commander Says (Center — Bloomberg Politics)
More Headlines From March 4, 2026
- Polls start closing in today's primaries in Texas, North Carolina and Arkansas (Center)
- Texas primary shows that MAGA loves a villain (Left)
- Here's what we learned from the bruising Texas primaries (Left)
- Data analyst explains why 'unusual' numbers coming out of Texas are 'tremendous for Dems' (Left)
- Jeffries rejects Republican bid to fund DHS amid Iran conflict (Center)








