NewsNation
Mamdani-backed candidates sweep New York primaries
The wins show voters may be willing to move farther left than the mainstream Democratic Party.
Center
The Gateway Pundit
The Idiots of ‘The View’ Praise Their New Communist Overlords of the DSA (VIDEO)
Far Right
Not everyone is upset about the communist takeover of the Democrat Party. The post The Idiots of ‘The View’ Praise Their New Communist Overlords of the DSA (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Compare Perspectives
Found 8 stories
The Gateway Pundit
Hive-Minded DSA Members Chant ‘YOU’RE NEXT!’ at Democrat House Leader Hakeem Jeffries (VIDEO)
The radical communists of the DSA have taken over the Democrat party. The post Hive-Minded DSA Members Chant ‘YOU’RE NEXT!’ at Democrat House Leader Hakeem Jeffries (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Far Right
NYT > U.S. > Politics
After New York’s Primary Elections, Democrats Face Five Big Questions
The anti-establishment left surged. How shaken are party leaders?
Center Left
The Dispatch
Crazy Begets Crazy in New York City
The Democratic Socialist primary sweep is the latest failure of our cowardly parties-in-name-only.
Center Right
Salon.com
Socialist sweep reveals New York City’s rising power centers
New Yorkers supported the leftmost candidates at nearly every opportunity on Tuesday
Left
Latest Political News on Fox News
New York congressional primary becomes second most expensive House race ever amid AI fight
New York's 12th Congressional District primary became the second-most expensive House primary ever, with $26.3 million in ad spending over AI regulation.
Right
Reason.com
Mamdani's Socialists Conquer New York City
Robby Soave and Jason Russell break down the socialist sweep in NYC, the latest in House of the Dragon, and the World Cup.
Center Right
Raw Story
GOP's 'unconscionable' omission in new farm bill has hunger experts furious
Senate Republicans unveiled annual farm legislation this week that would do nothing to address the worsening nationwide hunger crisis spurred by President Donald Trump and the GOP’s unprecedented assault on federal food aid.The draft bill introduced Tuesday by Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), the chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, omits a Democratic proposal to delay a provision of the 2025 Republican budget law that will require states to pay a share of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for the first time in the program’s history, while also increasing states’ share of administrative costs. State leaders have warned of massive budgetary impacts that could result in even deeper cuts to food aid—and potentially force states to withdraw from the SNAP program entirelyTy Jones Cox, vice president for food assistance at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), said it was “unconscionable” for Republicans to do nothing in the face of large-scale loss of food aid—including among children—and a looming budgetary disaster for states across the country.“The harm unfolding across the country is already far greater than many anticipated, with more than 4 million people losing SNAP through March,” Cox said in a statement Tuesday. “Even more people will lose the vital food assistance they need to afford groceries unless Congress immediately delays HR 1’s unprecedented shift of significant new SNAP costs to states.”Without congressional action, the SNAP cost-shifting provision of the Republican budget law will take effect on October 1, 2027. Survey data released this month shows that nearly 30% of US state governments believe they could be forced to narrow SNAP eligibility to cope with the new costs, which are expected to average $218 million per state. Eleven percent of states “identified withdrawing from SNAP as a potential risk,” according to the poll conducted by the American Public Human Services Association.It really seems like it should be a bigger deal that 11% of states who responded to this survey identified *withdrawing from SNAP entirely* as a potential risk of the massive cost shift that's about to hit state budgets thanks to H.R. 1. https://t.co/RbsY9LNdLv pic.twitter.com/TKOQIIK0ci— Katie Bergh (@Katie_Bergh) June 23, 2026 Crystal FitzSimons, president of the Food Research & Action Center, said Tuesday that the Republican farm bill “ignores the needs of tens of millions of people, including families with children, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans, who are finding it increasingly difficult to put food on the table.”“By shifting program costs to states, expanding time limits, and putting a cap on future benefit adjustments, HR 1 has undermined SNAP, the stability of families, communities, and local economies, and weakened state budgets,” FitzSimons warned. “The SNAP benefit cost shift to states and increase in states’ administrative costs will force states to make impossible choices: reduce education funding, delay infrastructure investments, cut public health programs, constrain Medicaid spending, raise taxes, or reduce access to SNAP itself.”Senate Republicans unveiled their farm legislation amid a growing hunger and affordability crisis that experts say is directly attributable to Trump-GOP policies, from blanket tariffs to the war on Iran to SNAP cuts that the new bill—like the House version—does nothing to reverse.Survey data released Tuesday by the No Kid Hungry campaign found that 55% of low-income families with children have had to cut back on groceries recently to make ends meet. The poll also found that 90% of families surveyed reported that they “would have to cut back significantly on food” if they lost SNAP benefits.“Rising prices are making it harder for families to afford basic necessities,” George Kelemen, senior vice president of the No Kid Hungry campaign, said in a statement. “That’s why SNAP’s grocery benefit, which helps feed about 40 million Americans including nearly 16 million children, is a vital support for helping them put food on the table.”“This SNAP crisis is too dangerous to ignore,” Kelemen added. “Reasonable steps must be included in this farm bill to delay the cost-sharing until states have the time they need to implement all the complex changes handed to them.”
Far Left