The Gateway Pundit

“Steamy Pile of DOGE Sh*t!” – Crazed Tillis Trashes Pulte For Firing Deep State Intel Officials (VIDEO)

1 hour agoFar Right

RINO Senator Thom Tillis trashed Acting DNI Bill Pulte for firing Deep State intel officials. The post “Steamy Pile of DOGE Sh*t!” – Crazed Tillis Trashes Pulte For Firing Deep State Intel Officials (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Read Full Story at Source

Compare Perspectives

Found 8 stories

Admiral fired in Hegseth purge wins Democratic primary in South Carolina

US news | The Guardian

3 hours ago

Admiral fired in Hegseth purge wins Democratic primary in South Carolina

Nancy Lacore will spearhead effort to flip Republican House seat in November’s midterm electionsA three-star navy rear-admiral fired by Pete Hegseth last year in the defense secretary’s purge of senior US military officials has won the Democratic primary in a closely watched congressional race.Nancy Lacore secured the party’s nomination for the US House of Representatives in South Carolina’s first congressional district on Tuesday after defeating Mac Deford, a US Coast Guard veteran, in a runoff. Continue reading...

Center Left

Read →

“I Think Kamala Won” – Election Deniers Rosie O’Donnell and Jim Acosta Push Conspiracy Theory That Trump Stole the 2024 Election and is Rigging Midterms (VIDEO)

The Gateway Pundit

3 hours ago

“I Think Kamala Won” – Election Deniers Rosie O’Donnell and Jim Acosta Push Conspiracy Theory That Trump Stole the 2024 Election and is Rigging Midterms (VIDEO)

Rosie O'Donnell and former CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta put their Trump Derangement Syndrome on full display this week, teaming up to push what has been referred to as "election denialism" and a "threat to democracy." During an interview on Acosta's show, Rosie declared that Trump stole the election from Kamala Harris. The post “I Think Kamala Won” – Election Deniers Rosie O’Donnell and Jim Acosta Push Conspiracy Theory That Trump Stole the 2024 Election and is Rigging Midterms (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Far Right

Read →

New Trump appointee fires several office of director of national intelligence staff – report

US news | The Guardian

4 hours ago

New Trump appointee fires several office of director of national intelligence staff – report

Firings come less than a week after US president appointed Bill Pulte as acting director after Tulsi Gabbard left the postSeveral staff members have reportedly been fired from the US office of the director of national intelligence (DNI), multiple outlets have reported. These firings come less than a week after Donald Trump appointed Bill Pulte as the acting director after former director Tulsi Gabbard left the post in late May.According to CNN, who was first to report the firings on Monday, political appointees with ties to Gabbard were among those purged. ABC News reported that cuts to the National Terrorism Center were expected to be particularly large. Continue reading...

Center Left

Read →

NEW: Acting DNI Bill Pulte Has Fired Over 50 Career Deep State Intel Officials

The Gateway Pundit

5 hours ago

NEW: Acting DNI Bill Pulte Has Fired Over 50 Career Deep State Intel Officials

Acting DNI Bill Pulte has fired over 50 career Deep State intel officials so far. The post NEW: Acting DNI Bill Pulte Has Fired Over 50 Career Deep State Intel Officials appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Far Right

Read →

Acting DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency – Six Fired and 45 “sent back to their home agencies”

The Last Refuge

5 hours ago

Acting DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency – Six Fired and 45 “sent back to their home agencies”

CBS is reporting on events within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. As CTH previously outlined, Acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte is following a very predictable path. {GO DEEP} The part of the CBS report that tells the story is: “Six career and political intelligence staff were terminated and 45 were […] The post Acting DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency – Six Fired and 45 “sent back to their home agencies” appeared first on The Last Refuge.

Far Right

Read →

Social media video shows how not to practice drawing your handgun

BizPac Review

8 hours ago

Social media video shows how not to practice drawing your handgun

We’re often told that practice makes perfect in all aspects of our life, but when it comes to firearms safety, it can be all too easy to […]

Far Right

Read →

WATCH: Social media video shows how NOT to practice drawing your handgun

WorldNetDaily

8 hours ago

WATCH: Social media video shows how NOT to practice drawing your handgun

'Gun safety instructors are currently weeping into their coffee watching this'

Far Right

Read →

Supreme Court backs border officials in green-card dispute

Blaze Media

10 hours ago

Supreme Court backs border officials in green-card dispute

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday that border officials do not need “clear and convincing evidence” that a lawful permanent resident committed a disqualifying crime before treating that person as an applicant for admission rather than someone already admitted to the United States. The decision was split along ideological lines.'Border officers did not have the burden to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Lau had committed a crime involving moral turpitude.'The case involved Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national and green card holder who was charged in 2012 with selling counterfeit clothing. After briefly traveling to China while the charge was pending, Lau was paroled into the U.S. rather than admitted when he returned. He later pleaded guilty to trademark counterfeiting.During oral arguments in April, the government argued that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require immigration officers at the border to possess clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident committed a crime involving moral turpitude — an act driven by dishonesty or immorality. Instead, government attorney Sopan Joshi argued that any burden is satisfied later during the individual's removal hearings.Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas agreed. The court held that the INA allows the government to regard a lawful permanent resident as seeking admission if he has committed a qualifying offense and that nothing in the statute imposes a requirement of clear and convincing evidence on border officers making "quick judgments on the spot."“Border officers did not have the burden to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Lau had committed a crime involving moral turpitude,” Thomas wrote.The ruling reverses the Second Circuit's decision, which had sided with Lau and held that immigration officials needed clear and convincing evidence that he had actually committed the crime before treating him as an applicant for entry rather than a person already admitted.RELATED: ‘Shall not be infringed’ — even if you're high, Supreme Court rules Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented, arguing that the government must determine whether an exception applies under the INA before stripping a green card holder of admitted status. She warned that the majority's approach gives the government broad authority to parole lawful permanent residents and justify the decision later.“But today the Court allows the Government to deem an LPR to be ‘seeking an admission’ first and justify the applicability of an exception later — undermining the statutory scheme as well as the benefits and security that come with having a green card,” Jackson asserted.The court did not decide whether Lau's trademark counterfeiting conviction qualifies as a crime involving moral turpitude, sending the case back to the Second Circuit for further proceedings.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Right

Read →