Artificial intelligence may change American healthcare forever, study suggests
Far Right
The global market value of artificial intelligence in healthcare is projected to surge by 2034, according to a study by The Insight Partners released Monday. Valued at […]
President Trump told French President Emmanuel Macron and reporters on Monday that he plans to refocus his energy on the war in Russia and Ukraine now that a deal with Iran has been finalized. As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier, Trump confirmed during the meeting that the memorandum of understanding to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz is "all signed." An official ceremony will be held on Friday in Switzerland with Vice President JD Vance leading the US delegation.
The post (VIDEO) Trump Says He’s “Focusing On” Russia-Ukraine Now That Iran Deal is Signed – Suggests “They’re Both Open to It” After Phone Calls with Zelensky and Putin appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Shortly after arriving in France Monday for the Group of Seven summit, President Donald Trump revealed that he may not show up to Friday’s signing ceremony cementing the tentative agreement reached between the United States and Iran to end the war.His reason, he explained, was a pre-planned dinner event.“Hey sir, are you gonna try to attend the signing ceremony on Friday?” a reporter asked Trump as he sat beside French President Emmanuel Macron."Well, it depends. [Vice President] JD [Vance] is coming in for it, he was originally going to do it – I'll probably be gone by then, we're having dinner... in a day and a half, right?” Trump said, looking to Macron for confirmation. “We're gonna be staying quite late. So I may be involved, I may not."Trump broadly boasted Sunday that his administration had reached a tentative deal with Iranian officials to bring about an end to the war he initiated back in late February. While Trump bragged of his ability to “make peace with Iran” where all presidents “failed before” him, Iranian officials instead credited their own negotiators for having recruited psychologists to help navigate what they considered to be Trump’s “mental illness."Trump on if he'll attend the Iran deal signing ceremony on Friday:"It depends... I'll probably be gone by then, we're having dinner... in a day and a half, right? We're gonna be staying quite late. So I may be involved, I may not." pic.twitter.com/Tg7H8FXZEX— Alexander Willis (@ReporterWillis) June 15, 2026
President Trump on Monday did not commit to attending the signing of the agreement to end the Iran war later in the week. Trump, having just arrived for the Group of Seven summit and seated next to French President Emmanuel Macron in Evian-les-Bains, France, told reporters that “it depends” on whether or not he will…
On her new morning show, "Money Power Politics" — which debated Monday morning, June 15 following the popular "Morning Joe" program — MS NOW's Stephanie Ruhle brought on former Homeland Security Chief of Staff Miles Taylor for a reaction to President Donald Trump's new Iran agreement. And the Never Trump conservative was downright scathing in his assessment.Taylor told Ruhle, "I'm going to go out there on a limb, Steph, and say I think that this is on track to be the worst deal in American diplomatic history. And look, I say that, recognizing…. that we don't have the text yet. But it's very, very hard to imagine there is a deal here that's any better than the deal we already had. In fact, if the initial reporting is to be believed, the Iranians think they're on a pathway to get $24 billion in assets unfrozen. That would be more than ten times what the Obama administration helped unlock for the Iranians."The former U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official added, "So, put it another way: We're paying ten times — potentially ten times — what we did before to get the same promise from the Iranians. And in international law, there's nothing that you can say about their commitment to not pursue nuclear weapons that's stronger than a promise. There's no global police force to require the Iranians to not pursue a bomb."Trump has been highly critical of the Iran deal that former President Barack Obama agreed to during his second term. But Taylor noted that when he was serving in DHS during Trump's first presidency, the president "threw out" the Obama administration's agreement without having "any plan to replace the Obama deal with." Taylor told Ruhle, "Again, the devil will be in the details, but I have a feeling we're going to see the devil."Taylor was serving as DHS chief of staff during Trump's first presidency when he anonymously wrote a widely read New York Times op-ed headlined, "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration." The op-ed detailed Taylor's efforts to dissuade Trump from following through on his worst ideas. The conservative Taylor subsequently came out as the author of that op-ed and became openly critical of Trump, supporting Kamala Harris in 2024. Ruhle formerly hosted MS NOW's late-night show "The Final Hour," and "Money Power Politics" — which now airs after "Morning Joe," hosted by conservative Joe Scarborough and liberal Mika Brzezinski — marks her debut as a morning host on the liberal-leaning cable news channel.
Writing for the conservative Washington Examiner newspaper, a scholar specializing in Middle East policy tore into President Donald Trump's new Iran deal, saying that it "takes Americans for fools" and calling it the "gravest blunder" of Trump's political career.After much hype and numerous failed starts, the U.S. and Iran signed a deal on Sunday to pause their ongoing conflict, reopening the Strait of Hormuz for oil shipments and giving the nations two more months to negotiate a final deal. While the actual full text of the deal has not yet been released, some of the details have already been reported to heavy criticism, including Iran potentially getting as much as $24 million in frozen assets returned to them. This particular stipulation led Miles Taylor, a former Homeland Security Chief of Staff in Trump's first term turned whistleblower, to say that the deal was "on track to be the worst deal in American diplomatic history."Further scathing criticism came on Monday from Jose Lev Alvarez, an American-Israeli policy scholar specializing in Middle Eastern security, who wrote about the deal for the Washington Examiner and pulled no punches, calling the deal "Obama 2.0, but more humiliating." "When President Donald Trump accepted the April 2026 ceasefire, I knew he had committed the gravest political blunder of his career," Alvarez wrote. "America and Israel had cornered Iran, shattered its leverage, and battered its proxies. Instead of forcing permanent concessions, the White House now appears ready to rescue Tehran and rebrand retreat as a 'peace crusade.'”He added: "This craven virtual surrender to the ayatollahs confirms my worst fears. Under this deal, Washington would reopen the Strait of Hormuz (now subject to Omani and Iranian supervision and tolls), lift the blockade on Iranian ports, grant temporary oil waivers, extend the ceasefire for 60 days, and defer the decisive nuclear questions to technical negotiations echoing Obama’s failed 2015 Vienna diplomacy."In exchange for those American wins, Alvarez noted that Iran will "supposedly" pledge not to build a nuclear bomb and halt further nuclear developments, with "deadlines, inspections, and enforcement mechanisms — the provisions separating a binding agreement from diplomatic theater," to be worked out later.All of this, he argued, amounted to "an American surrender by installment," instead of an Iranian "capitulation." He also reserved particular scorn for Vice President JD Vance and his part in negotiating the deal."Vice President JD Vance — the true architect of this disastrous agreement — initially dismissed reports of an Iranian payday as 'fake information,' insisting Tehran would receive no money merely for signing," he wrote. "That denial is semantic camouflage. The United States agrees to release $25 billion of Iran’s frozen assets in Qatar, including through direct cash transfers. Separately, the United Arab Emirates agreed to unlock — although it denies it publicly — up to $20 billion for Iran, with approximately $3 billion already delivered to Tehran. The route is irrelevant. The result is not. Through unfrozen assets, Gulf transfers, restored oil revenues, and renewed market access, Tehran will receive billions to replenish the regime that attacks Americans, bankrolls terrorists, and destabilizes the Middle East."He added later: "This would not be a battlefield defeat. It would be a defeat by choice — the pathology that converted tactical dominance in Vietnam and Afghanistan into strategic failure. Iran needs three things: time, money, and Western self-deception. This framework flawlessly delivers all three."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's jobs may be at stake if they continue to oppose President Donald Trump's Iran deal, a senior White House official warned.The threat emerged in a report published Sunday by the right-leaning Israeli daily Israel Hayom, which detailed a bitter internal White House battle over the emerging memorandum of understanding with Tehran."The debate has been settled. Those who oppose it may pay a personal price," a senior US official told the outlet.According to the report, Vice President JD Vance, envoy Steve Witkoff, and Trump envoy Jared Kushner have driven the push for a deal, arguing the Iranian regime is unlikely to collapse soon and that Gulf states — particularly Qatar — have pressed hard for an agreement.Rubio and Hegseth argued the opposite: that Iran is buckling under economic pressure and Washington should tighten the screws, not ease them. The two men had been the public faces of that harder line — touting "Project Freedom," a plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force, only for Trump to shelve it hours after they publicly praised it.Trump has since sided firmly with the deal camp. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly warned that lifting sanctions would be nearly impossible to reverse, but the Israel Hayom report said his objections changed the terms only slightly."This is an American game being managed with utter foolishness…Trump is acting badly and against the American interest, not only the Israeli one," Oded Ailam, a former senior Mossad official, told Israel Hayom.Sanctions on Iranian oil sales are expected to be lifted — at least in part — after the Strait of Hormuz fully reopens, according to the report.
A former national security official during President Donald Trump's first term sharply criticized his agreement with Iran to end hostilities.Miles Taylor, who served as National Security Council chief of staff in the first Trump administration, told MS NOW's Stephanie Ruhle that none of the terms the 80-year-old president had reached with Iran improved the situation from before he decided to launch the war in February."I'm going to go out there on a limb and say that I think this is on track to be the worst deal in American diplomatic history," Taylor said. "We don't have the text yet, but it's very, very hard to imagine there is a deal here that's any better than the deal we already had. In fact, if the initial reporting is to be believed, the Iranians think that they're on a pathway to get $24 billion in assets unfrozen, that would be more than 10 times what the Obama administration effectively helped unlock for the Iranians.""So put it another way we're paying 10 times, potentially paying 10 times what we did before to get the same promise from the Iranians, and in international law, there's nothing that you can say about their commitment to not pursue nuclear weapons," he added. "That's stronger than a promise. There is no global police force to require the Iranians to not pursue a bomb. So all we could get, the best we could get is a promise from the Iranians, a promise we already had and once."Taylor had a front-row seat to a decision that Trump made in his first term that set the war in motion."Donald Trump threw out [the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] in the first administration, when I was there," Taylor said. "I can remember the frustration of staff when Donald Trump did not have any plan to replace the Obama deal with tore it up, and now here we are again, potentially on the pathway to unlocking 10 times as much money for the Iranian regime to get the same agreement that we had previously.""Now, again, the devil will be in the details," he added, "but I have a feeling we're going to see the devil." - YouTube youtu.be
Freedom 250 announced details on Sunday about the rodeo it is holding on Washington, D.C.’s National Mall. The rodeo is an effort to “tell the story of the people and traditions that helped shape the American frontier and the nation,” according to organizers. It will be held daily as part of the Great American State […]
