The Gateway Pundit

AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity

Mar 15, 2026Far Right

AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity Republished with permission from AbleChild. Netflix’s Nuremberg is a disgraceful reframing of history. The post AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Read Full Story at Source

Compare Perspectives

Found 8 stories

Review: Gore Vidal's Burr Is the Anti-Hamilton

Reason.com

12 hours ago

Review: Gore Vidal's Burr Is the Anti-Hamilton

America's Founding through the eyes of the least popular Founding Father

Center Right

Read →

'Everybody should be able to participate’: Advocate for open primaries

NBC News Politics

Yesterday

'Everybody should be able to participate’: Advocate for open primaries

As midterms approach, advocates of election reform warn Congress could soon become more polarized. John Opdycke, Founder and President of Open Primaries, joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss how closed, single-party primaries exclude independent voters and could feed polarization in U.S. politics.

Center Left

Read →

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Super Subbu’ On Netflix, An Indian Comedy Where A Man Is Sent To A Remote Village To Teach Sex Education To The Kids Of Traditional Parents

New York Post

Yesterday

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Super Subbu’ On Netflix, An Indian Comedy Where A Man Is Sent To A Remote Village To Teach Sex Education To The Kids Of Traditional Parents

How do you teach sex education in a village that tied the last sex ed teacher to a tree?

Right

Read →

Conservative National Review slams MAGA for 'abuse of' Amy Coney Barrett

Alternet.org

Yesterday

Conservative National Review slams MAGA for 'abuse of' Amy Coney Barrett

Many MAGA Republicans exploded in anger when conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and three Democratic appointees — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — in Trump v. Barbara, which invalidated an executive order by President Donald Trump calling for an end to birthright citizenship. This wasn't the first time MAGA Republicans raged against Barrett, and an editorial by the conservative National Review calls out MAGA "abuse of" the Trump appointee.Barrett has a decidedly conservative resumé, describing herself as an "originalist" and an admirer of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. But her willingness to occasionally buck MAGA and vote with the Democratic justices is infuriating MAGA Republicans and Trump loyalists."Criticism comes, rightly, with the territory of being a Supreme Court justice," the National Review editors argue in their editorial. "Hysteria shouldn't. With the conclusion of the 2025–26 Supreme Court term and Donald Trump's defeat on birthright citizenship, we have been treated to another round of abuse from right-leaning commentators directed toward Justice Amy Coney Barrett. The immediate trigger of their ire is Barrett's joining the Trump v. Barbara majority (along with Chief Justice John Roberts and, on the outcome, Justice Brett Kavanaugh) striking down Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship."The Review editors continue, "Barrett critics also cite her majority opinion in Watson v. Republican National Committee, which allowed states to accept ballots postmarked by Election Day for up to five days later, as well as her vote, along with Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch, to strike down Trump's 'emergency' global tariffs and her rulings against Trump in a few of last summer's torrent of emergency decisions on deportations."On the MAGA far right, the conservative justice is often attacked as "Amy 'Commie' Barrett" — which is the type of rhetoric the Review is calling out."It's the intemperate vitriol of these attacks, and their utter lack of perspective, that appalls us," the Review editors lament. "Critics brand Barrett a traitor, a DEI hire and a left-winger who has doomed the country. They complain that she makes poor decisions because she is a woman and a mother of adopted children from Haiti. Perhaps more ominously, there is much muttering that future Republicans should fill judicial vacancies with fewer people devoted to the law and more who will be mere party apparatchiks, voting in the results-oriented fashion we traditionally associate with the liberal justices…. No, we don't always agree with her, or with the Court's decisions since her arrival in 2020 formed the current 6–3 majority."The Review editors continue, "Nor, for that matter, do we agree every single time with any of her distinguished colleagues. The Court's cases are often hard, and its justices fallible. That's why there are nine of them."

Left

Read →

States can ban transgender participation in girls and women's sports, Supreme Court rules

Politics - CBSNews.com

3 days ago

States can ban transgender participation in girls and women's sports, Supreme Court rules

The Supreme Court justices weighed in on whether states can ban transgender athletes from competing in female school and college sports. Jan Crawford has more.

Center

Read →

Supreme Court upholds bans on transgender athletes participating in women and girls' sports

NPR Topics: News

3 days ago

Supreme Court upholds bans on transgender athletes participating in women and girls' sports

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who has long coached his daughters' and other girls' basketball teams at school, wrote the court's majority opinion.

Center

Read →

Trump says he will 'continue the fight' after Supreme Court declines to review Carroll abuse verdict

Latest Political News on Fox News

4 days ago

Trump says he will 'continue the fight' after Supreme Court declines to review Carroll abuse verdict

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's appeal of a $5 million verdict finding he sexually abused and defamed writer E. Jean Carroll, leaving the judgement in place.

Right

Read →

Trump surprised by Supreme Court decision to not review E. Jean Carroll case

The Hill News

4 days ago

Trump surprised by Supreme Court decision to not review E. Jean Carroll case

President Trump on Monday said he was surprised by the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s suit against him, in which he was found liable for sexually abusing the writer inside a dressing room during the mid-1990s and defaming her. “Surprisingly, the Supreme Court declined to ‘review’ a Fake…

Center

Read →

AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity

Summary

Related Coverage

More Headlines From March 15, 2026

AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity

Compare Perspectives