President Donald Trump 's hand-picked candidate for Iowa Governor, Congressman Randy Feenstra, narrowly lost his primary Tuesday night.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin will testify before the House Homeland Security Committee Wednesday morning on President Trump’s fiscal 2027 budget request for DHS. The White House is asking for $63 billion in budget authority for the department in 2027, a $2.2 billion decrease from 2026 enacted levels — just over a…
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is heading back to Capitol Hill on Wednesday for his second day of back-to-back testimonies before House and Senate committees. Rubio will testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 10 a.m. about the State Department’s budget for fiscal 2027, which requested 30% less discretionary spending funds than last year. RUBIO TAKES ISSUE WITH ROSEN SAYING IT’S ‘EMBARRASSING’ […]
Woke Los Angeles mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman burst into tears as she thanked her family while early results showed she fell into a distant third place in the race.
Spencer Pratt appears on track to advance to a November runoff against LA Mayor Karen Bass after no candidate cleared 50% in Tuesday's primary.
U.S. President Donald Trump, in a recent series of GOP primaries, unseated one prominent Republican after another — including Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky) and Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), none of whom will be competing with Democratic candidates in the 2026 midterms' general election. But on Tuesday, June 2 in Iowa's GOP gubernatorial primary, Trump suffered what the New York Times' Reid J. Epstein describes as a "shock defeat."Trump, four days before the election, endorsed Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Iowa) for governor of Iowa. But Feenstra narrowly lost that primary to businessman/farmer Zach Lahn."The primary loss for Rep. Randy Feenstra, whom the president endorsed on Friday afternoon, came at a time of mixed signals of Mr. Trump's power over the Republican Party," Epstein explains in the New York Times. "He has won a series of dominant primary victories over Republican opponents, but has faced rising pushback from his party in Congress."In the past, GOP and Democratic strategists considered Iowa a swing state. Former President Barack Obama won Iowa in both 2008 and 2012. Yet the midwestern state has trended Republican in recent years. Trump carried Iowa in three presidential elections in a row, defeating Democratic nominee Kamala Harris by roughly 13 percent in the state in 2024.But Trump's endorsement wasn't enough to get Feenstra past the finish line in Iowa's 2026 GOP gubernatorial primary. And Epstein describes that outcome as a "rare high-profile primary loss" for the president."In modern Republican primary politics," the New York Times reporter notes, "Mr. Trump's endorsement is the gold standard. In the last month, it has ousted sitting senators, a congressman and state legislators whom the president deemed insufficiently loyal. So when Mr. Feenstra won Mr. Trump's endorsement for governor last week, it felt like the push he needed to get past four candidates in the primary."Epstein continues, "Yet Mr. Feenstra was toppled on Tuesday by Zach Lahn, a conservative political operative and farmer who ran an insurgent campaign. Mr. Feenstra was seen as having run a lackluster campaign, and also faced the wrath of former Rep. Steve King, who lost to Mr. Feenstra in a 2020 primary and backed Mr. Lahn. Mr. Feenstra's defeat makes him the highest-profile candidate endorsed by Mr. Trump to lose a Republican primary race in years — perhaps since Luther Strange, an appointed senator in Alabama, fell to Roy Moore in a 2017 special election primary. Mr. Moore went on to lose the general election to Doug Jones, a Democrat."The presumptive nominee in Iowa's gubernatorial race is State Auditor Rob Sand. Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican, decided not to seek reelection.Iowa's last Democratic governor was Chet Culver, who left office in January 2011.
President Donald Trump admitted in an interview published Wednesday that he lobbed expletives at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an explosive phone call on Monday, citing his growing frustration with Israel’s refusal to halt its invasion and bombardment of Lebanon as the cause for his outburst.Details of the supposed call were first reported on by Axios, which claimed Trump had called Netanyahu “f------ crazy,” and said that “everybody hates you” and “hates Israel.” Trump also reportedly told the prime minister that he’d “be in prison if it weren’t for me,” with Netanyahu having been indicted on corruption charges by the Israeli government, and for war crimes by the International Criminal Court.Trump was asked about the authenticity of the call in an interview with The New York Post’s Miranda Devine, host of the outlet’s podcast Pod Force One.“You were angry with him, you said ‘are you f-ing crazy, what are you f-ing doing, I helped you stay out of jail’ – is that true?” Devine asked in a video interview published on Wednesday. “Did you speak to him in those terms?”“I did,” Trump admitted, before pressing back on the call being characterized as “angry.” “I wouldn’t say angry, I was a little bit… perturbed at his constantly fighting with Lebanon, you know? At some point, I said, ‘Bibi, we got to stop this, we got to stop this.’”Since its latest invasion of Lebanon in early March, Israel has killed more than 3,400 Lebanese and injured over 10,200, per the Lebanon Health Ministry. Israel’s bombardment of Lebanon is a key sticking point in the Trump administration’s peace negotiations with Tehran. Iran has demanded that Israel halt its bombardment of Lebanon as a condition in its negotiations with the Trump administration on ending the war, a demand that Israel has largely ignored, despite Trump himself demanding as much in April.Trump on Axios report that he told Netanyahu "you're f*cking crazy":I did. I always get angry. I was a little bit perturbed at him, constantly fighting with Lebanon....You know, at some point I said we're going to stop this. pic.twitter.com/4c6Tpo1GkZ— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 3, 2026
Democrats haven't yet learned that their abuses of power can be used against them by their opposition. It's just a matter of time.
The $1.8bn fund would have paid people the Trump administration decided were unjustly and politically targeted.