Federal Judge Strikes Key Parts of Trump Order Restricting Mail Voting
The ruling rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to change federal election procedures through an executive order.

The ruling rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to change federal election procedures through an executive order.
A federal judge on Thursday blocked the implementation of key parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order on mail voting, declaring the plans to intervene in state-run elections unconstitutional.
A judge in Boston blocked US officials from carrying out President Donald Trump’s executive order to impose new restrictions on mail-in voting in federal elections while the legal fight moves forward.
The newly picked New York Democratic nominee for the House, Claire Valdez, has called for abolishing the Transportation Security Administration’s PreCheck and ultimately nationalizing the airline industry, positions that are likely to draw scrutiny as Democrats grapple with the rise of the party’s socialist wing. Valdez, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, defeated […]
President Trump signed an executive order in March requiring the creation of a list of U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state and imposing stricter mail-in ballot rules.
The White House commended two major decisions from the Supreme Court on Thursday morning, which bolster the Trump administration’s ability to crack down on immigration. In these rulings, the high court decided that the Trump administration could cut off temporary legal protections for thousands of Haitians and Syrians and cleared the path for the administration…
A federal judge in Massachusetts on Thursday blocked key portions of President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to tighten rules governing mail-in voting, ruling the president lacked constitutional authority to impose the changes on states ahead of this year’s midterm elections. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction halting implementation of several provisions in Trump’s […]
The ruling of a three-judge appeals panel in Michigan was the most significant rebuke yet to the Department of Justice’s effort to find ineligible voters in state voter rolls.