A former US Marine reservist and seven others were sentenced Tuesday to decades in prison over a shooting last year that wounded a police officer during a demonstration at a Texas immigration detention center.
A 19-year-old arsonist was sentenced Tuesday to over five years in jail for setting a sleeping homeless man on fire on board a subway car that was passing through Midtown.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
An expansive bipartisan bill intended to bring down the cost of housing by boosting the supply of homes has passed both houses of Congress, and is headed to the president's desk for a signature.
An Army sergeant was sentenced to life in a military prison Tuesday for shootings last summer that wounded five people at a base in Georgia.
President Trump says the latest agreement with Iran is moving peace talks forward, but critics argue the deal gives Tehran major concessions on oil sales, nuclear oversight, and control of the Strait of Hormuz. Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico is under renewed scrutiny as old comments on race, gender, religion, and identity politics resurface...
In a 6-3 decision in Blanche v. Lau, the Supreme Court's conservative majority sided with the Trump administration, ruling border officials can revoke green cards from returning residents based on suspicion of criminal activity without requiring evidence. The Independent reports Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her conservative colleagues for betraying existing green card holders. The case involved Muk Choi Lau, a lawful permanent resident who returned from China in 2012 and was placed on immigration parole after being accused of counterfeiting crimes, the outlet explains. Though Lau later pleaded guilty to selling counterfeit clothes, he challenged the officer's authority in triggering deportation proceedings. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that border officers were not required to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Lau had committed a crime. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented sharply and argued, "That sequencing undermines the plain terms and basic operation of the relevant statutory scheme, which guarantees that lawful permanent residents will not be 'regarded as seeking an admission' at the border unless certain exceptions apply."Justice Brown Jackson also warned the ruling gave the government a massive blank check to rewrite immigration law and leave green card holders in legal limbo for years.Watch the video below. Your browser does not support the video tag.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, saying the ruling contained a “parade of horribles” that created bad precedent.