Reason.com
Who Is The District Court Judge Who Was Privately Reprimanded For Having Loud Sex In Her Chambers With A Law Enforcement Officer From Her District?
The clues in the memorandum point to a specific judge.
Center Right
Reason.com
Today in Supreme Court History: May 28, 1906
Center Right
5/28/1906: Justice Henry Billings Brown retired. The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 28, 1906 appeared first on Reason.com.
Compare Perspectives
Found 8 stories
Washington Examiner
Trump may already be a lame duck
At first glance, President Donald Trump seems more powerful than ever. His party controls both chambers of Congress, and he just asserted dominance over that party by ousting Indiana state senators who defied him on redistricting, as well as successfully primarying United States senators in Louisiana and Texas. But on closer examination, Trump has weakened […]
Center Right
The Hill News
Bipartisan group of former judges asks court to investigate Trump’s IRS deal
A group of former federal judges on Wednesday asked a federal court to reopen President Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), arguing that the administration circumvented the court by negotiating a settlement with the president and creating a $1.776 billion fund for those who believe that the government has wronged them. The group…
Center
The Hill News
Court allows Mahmoud Khalil to remain free while he petitions Supreme Court
A federal appeals court panel on Tuesday allowed pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to remain free as he takes his case against the Trump administration to the Supreme Court. Judges Stephanos Bibas, Arianna Freeman and Thomas Hardiman of the 3rd Circuit, appointees of President Trump, former President George W. Bush and former President Joe Biden, respectively, put the circuit…
Center
New York Post
Trans high school track athlete wins girls’ state championship before key Supreme Court ruling
Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 15-year-old sophomore at Bridgeport High School, is the only known openly transgender sports competitor in West Virginia.
Right
WorldNetDaily
WATCH: Radical justice Ketanji Jackson suggests lower courts should sometimes ignore Supreme Court precedents
Says it's 'absolutely' a question whether trial judges should obey
Far Right
The Gateway Pundit
Alabama Asks Supreme Court to Intervene After Lower Court Blocks New Congressional Map – SCOTUS Sets Deadline
Alabama asked the Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court blocked its new congressional map. The post Alabama Asks Supreme Court to Intervene After Lower Court Blocks New Congressional Map – SCOTUS Sets Deadline appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Far Right
Raw Story
Dozens of ex-federal judges launch bid to kill MAGA slush fund: 'The court was deceived'
A group of 35 former federal judges has filed legal action to try to forcibly reopen the Trump v. IRS lawsuit, as a means of shutting down the president's "settlement" with his own government that creates a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization" slush fund.President Donald Trump previously filed the suit, seeking $10 billion from his own tax agency for alleged negligence in keeping his tax information safe, after a whistleblower exposed confidential information about his returns.In the brief, the judges argued that the very existence of the settlement is improper and represents an abuse of the court system."This Court dismissed this action with prejudice ... in response to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice ... filed earlier that day," said the filing, noting that the judge wrote at the time Trump “neither submitted any settlement documents nor filed any documents ensuring that settlement was appropriate where there was an outstanding question as to whether an actual case or controversy existed. "The Court was deceived. Despite Plaintiffs not having mentioned any settlement in their Notice, the Department of Justice ... publicly announced a 'settlement' of this action shortly after Plaintiffs filed their dismissal."This action isn't legal, the judges wrote, and the case should be reopened to litigate its validity."The purported 'settlement' that the parties never placed before this Court raises profound questions about the parties’ candor toward the Court and manipulation of the judicial system, which threatens to undermine confidence in the administration of justice," they wrote. "As former judges, Movants have an interest in bringing to the Court’s attention these concerns and the availability of relief under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows the Court to set aside the judgment and reopen the case."All of this comes as the "Anti-Weaponization Fund," which the Justice Department insists is not political and open to all victims of "lawfare," has become so politically toxic that even Republicans in Congress have debated curtailing it.
Far Left