Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Pung v. Isabella County Takings Case
Source: Reason.com · Bias: Center Right
Summary
Most of the discussion was focused on the wrong issue. What matters under the Takings Clause is not the "fairness" of the process by which the owner's house was taken, but whether he got adequate "just compensation."
Related Coverage
- Trump Scores Appeals Court Victory in Battle Over National Park Historical Displays (Right — RedState)
- Lawfare: Kangaroo court picks fight with state’s conservative attorney general (Far Right — WorldNetDaily)
- UPDATE: Louisiana Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Politically Motivated Indictment Against AG Liz Murrill (Far Right — The Gateway Pundit)
- Karoline Leavitt warns ‘full-blown Communist revolution’ taking place right NOW (Far Right — BizPac Review)
- Iran’s supreme leader bails on first day of late dad’s funeral ceremonies (Right — New York Post)
- Of course Mamdani takes opportunity to blast America in July 4 speech focused on ‘flaws’ (Right — New York Post)
- Louisiana court halts criminal indictment against state attorney general (Center Left — US news | The Guardian)
- Will Trump v. Barbara End the Birthright Citizenship Debate? (UPDATED) (Center Right — Reason.com)
More Headlines From February 26, 2026
- Expert breaks down Trump's 'really bad' Epstein mistakes (Left)
- Trump hitting the panic button as Epstein files threaten to dismantle MAGA: expert (Left)
- Vance ‘not so sure’ Democrats love the US after State of the Union performance (Center Right)
- Democrats to force vote on Iran war powers resolution to rein in Trump (Center Right)
- Democrats’ new affordability champion Spanberger has no record of cutting costs yet (Center Right)







