Lisa Murkowski vying to replace Bill Cassidy on Senate health panel
Source: Washington Examiner · Bias: Center Right
Summary
EXCLUSIVE — Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) expressed interest in running the Senate health committee chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) next year, adding to the number of Republicans vying for the post. Cassidy’s loss in his Louisiana primary last month means that Republicans will need to choose another person to serve in his place, and […]
Lisa Murkowski vying to replace Bill Cassidy on Senate health panel
Center Right
EXCLUSIVE — Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) expressed interest in running the Senate health committee chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) next year, adding to the number of Republicans vying for the post. Cassidy’s loss in his Louisiana primary last month means that Republicans will need to choose another person to serve in his place, and […]
Two of President Trump’s most recent health nominees, including his newest pick to be head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), appeared before the Senate on Wednesday where a reluctance to break with the administration put Democrats and some Republicans on edge. Erica Schwartz, nominee to be the next director of the CDC, and Sean Kaufman, nominee to head the…
The Pentagon on Wednesday announced it will convene a panel to study the “decisions, coordination, planning, and execution” of the military’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine mandate, a rule that led to the dismissal or departure of more than 8,700 service members. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed the nonpartisan and independent National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA)…
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, President Trump's former personal lawyer, faced questions at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday. He tried to reassure key Republicans, but not everyone was convinced. Nikole Killion has more.
President Donald Trump is trying to push through acting attorney general Todd Blanche to be his actual attorney general — but, as some conservatives are mocking, Blanche’s cause was undermined on Wednesday by a member of his own Republican Party.“[Sen. John] Kennedy [R-LA], in his weird kind of goofy way, as you say, caused much more trouble for Blanche then these Democratic lawyers asking their fine-tuned legal challenges,” conservative commentator William Kristol explained during a podcast for The Bulwark. Kristol was referring to how Kennedy asked Blanche if he considered himself to be Trump’s friend, only for Blanche to reply that he considered himself to be “Trump’s lawyer.” Legally, the attorney general represents the American people, not the president himself.“Of course, he does think of himself as Trump's lawyer, and that is a core point which underlies ... a lot of the particularities of the decisions he's made in terms of prosecutions and pardons and ... Obviously the slush fund, right? So Kennedy, in his weird kind of goofy way, as you say, caused much more trouble for Blanche, these Democratic lawyers asking their fine-tuned legal challenges,” said Kristol.Sam Stein, Kristol’s co-host, then broke down whether Blanche has enough support to get confirmed.“Let's talk about math here,” Stein wrote. “So Mitch McConnell's out, which means there's 52 senators. The late Senator Lindsey Graham's sister is in, so it stays at 52, which means that it would take three Republicans to vote against Blanche to torpedo his nomination. I guess also the committee is at 11 Republicans, 10 Democrats. So if they can't get a majority in the committee, he doesn't get out of the committee.”Yet even though Republicans may have enough votes to bring Blanche to the floor, they do not have the 65 votes to break a Democratic filibuster against Blanche’s permanent appointment.“I don't know the particularities of this,” Stein concluded. “So anyways, there are ways to defeat him.”Later in the same broadcast, Stein and Bulwark contributor Will Saletan laughed at footage of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) interrogating Blanche.“Who rejected the 25 defenses the IRS had to this sham lawsuit?” Schiff asked Saletan. “Who rejected them? Who said that these defenses, we're not going to accept, we're just going to go with the president's agreement and the slush fund, and this immunity?”When Blanche tried to deflect by saying there was a lot of internal conversation, Schiff pointed out that Blanche “made the decision to not defend the IRS and the Justice Department. You made the decision instead to sign this slush fund agreement.”Blanche confirmed, “We made the decision to settle the case, correct, yeah.”Schiff replied, “And in doing that, you basically decided that you were going to be the lawyer for the president and the lawyer for the IRS and the Justice Department.As the court found in this case, there was no adversarial relationship. The court found it was a sham. It was a collusive relationship.”At this point, Saletan and Stein both snickered.“What I don't understand, Todd Blanche, [is] what happened to the Todd Blanche who was a prosecutor in the Southern District of New York?” Schiff asked in the hearing. “What happened to the prosecutor people had respect for? What happened to the prosecutor who once respected the rule of law? What happened to the prosecutor who said that there wouldn't be a whiff of political partisanship and then prosecutes the president's enemies over seashells, over making a video stating the plain law and constitution?”Schiff is referring to the $1.8 billion slush fund that Trump and Blanche created — and which they claimed was dead, although they have not proven this — to settle the president’s lawsuit against the IRS. Trump accused the IRS of violating his rights when an independent contractor leaked that he had not paid taxes for many years and had a number of previously undisclosed business failures. Even though no one has ever received monetary compensation for having their tax returns leaked, and it was unclear whether Trump even had the standing to sue the IRS he controls, Blanche controversially refused to defend the IRS and instead settled with Trump for the $1.8 billion slush fund for Trump supporters and Trump-affiliated agencies, as well as to never audit the president or his family again.Earlier this week U..S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams voided the settlement in a 56-page order in which she characterized the settlement as self-dealing on the basis of the fact that a sitting president sued an agency he controls, then settled with himself.
While cable news focused on the Senate confirmation hearing of attorney general nominee Todd Blanche, there was another hearing for President Donald Trump's nominee to take over for Tulsi Gabbard. Jay Clayton, who is Trump's second nominee to serve as his second Director of National Intelligence, refused to answer basic questions before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday. When faced with questions about Gabbard's presence in Fulton County, Georgia, when the FBI raided the county elections office. At first, Calyton struggled to give a straight answer, and then that answer changed.Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) asked whether he was aware of the raid, and Clayton said he had been informed of it by Ossoff."What is going on here?" Ossoff questioned when he couldn't get a straight answer. He then demanded a "yes or no" answer."I just said I was made aware of it by you yesterday," a perspiring Clayton said. "The first time you learned Director Gabbard was present at that raid was in my office yesterday?" Ossoff said, shocked, given it was such a huge story and so important to the department. Clayton said it was "the first time" in his "recollection" that he'd "thought about it recently.""What?" a confused Ossoff asked. The interview then devolved into a kind of "who's on first" routine where Clayton hedged around his answers, and Ossoff fought for a "yes or no" answer. MS NOW host Katy Tur questioned veteran newsman and author David Rohde, "He calls it a hypothetical, but that's what happened. So, what's up with that answer?" Rohde, an NBC national security analyst, called it absolutely extraordinary," but it wasn't a compliment. "You're interviewing for a job. You're going to be the Director of National Intelligence. Your predecessor was ordered by the president of the United States to go down and witness an FBI raid, where they seized election records in Fulton County, Georgia. The president has no control over elections in this country. We've talked about it over and over again," Rohde said, implying Clayton didn't fully grasp the seriousness of the position. "It was mind-boggling the way he answered that question, that he claimed he didn't even know that Tulsi Gabbard had been there," Rohde said with disbelief. "And then when asked if he would do this order. I mean, this is a violation of the Constitution. This is the president trying to interfere [and] potentially steal an election. And Jay Clayton could be asked to do this. His answer is, I'm just learning of this now."Rohde mentioned comments from Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) previously that he was willing to give Clayton a chance, and he simply didn't cut it. Warner "asked [Clayton] one more time, in your preparation for these hearings, did you come across or think about or prepare for questions about Tulsi Gabbard being sent to seize those election records in Georgia? And he — and Jay Clayton said it just wasn't something that was on my mind before this hearing. That was astonishing," Rohde said. - YouTube youtu.be - YouTube www.youtube.com
Sen. John Kennedy demanded answers on whether Jack Smith read his emails and shared them with Attorney General Garland during the confirmation hearing.
