Trump warning that Iran ‘won’t have a country’ if it closes strait of Hormuz contrasts with vice-president’s tone seeking to turn over ‘new leaf’ with Tehran – key US politics stories from Sunday 21 JuneDonald Trump threatened to resume war with Iran even as his vice-president JD Vance met Iranian officials to begin peace talks in Switzerland.Also overshadowing negotiations in Bürgenstock was Tehran’s announcement it had again closed the strait of Hormuz, a threat made because of ongoing Israeli strikes on southern Lebanon. Continue reading...
“Lots of Killing going on in Chicago…Why isn’t [Illinois] Governor [JB] Pritzker calling me for help?” President Trump wrote on Truth Social early Sunday.
On Monday, Trump announced beginning concepts of a plan to discuss an outline of understanding on how to end the war in Iran. It was Trump’s 39th such announcement since he started the war.Israeli leaders, ostensible partners in Trump’s war, are now convinced that Trump’s MOU with Iran makes Obama’s 2015 Iran nuclear deal look perfect in comparison, after Trump tore that deal up, calling it "a deal at the highest level of incompetence" and "the worst deal ever negotiated." Obama’s 2015 deal featured highly detailed, multi-decade uranium enrichment caps and verification protocols, while the core mechanisms of Trump’s MOU remain unfinalized and deferred for 60-days. Although Trump’s MOU may pause the fighting he started, it has not established any permanent, legally binding nuclear dismantlement or the long-term inspection protocols Trump initially demanded, and it includes a plan to hand Iran up to $300 billion in damages. The biggest achievement will be the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, is simply a return to the prewar status quo.Fox News, after promoting Trump’s attacks on the 2015 Iran deal, reported the MOU saying, Trump “deserves credit for bringing this conflict to this point.” Fox News manipulated Trump into Iran Fox may be reluctant to criticize an end to a costly war it encouraged. Fox News and its hawkish hosts played an aggressive role in pushing Trump toward greater military force in Iran — a troubling dynamic critics call a "doom loop" between the White House and the network, a self-reinforcing feedback cycle where the administration's grievances and policies prioritize media spectacle over governance, which in turn shapes presidential policy and messaging.As early as June 2025, Fox talking heads pushed for war with Iran, encouraging Trump into open conflict. Mark Levin reportedly helped push the June 2025 U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities by convincing Trump over lunch that the country was just days away from getting a nuclear weapon. When a fragile ceasefire was declared in April 2026, rather than celebrating, many Fox voices including senior security analyst Jack Keane and host Brian Kilmeade demanded it be broken. These voices agitated for the Trump administration and Israel to resume aggressive bombing campaigns rather than continue diplomatic negotiations, demanding Trump restart the war and, in their words, "finish the job." Host Ainsley Earhardt even told Trump that Americans were supportive of escalating aggression in Iran, which was not true.Sean Hannity, Brian Kilmeade, and Jesse Watters all floated the idea of flooding Iran with small arms to provoke an uprising. Kilmeade, one of the network's most prominent hawks and co-host of Fox & Friends, proposed relentless U.S. strikes against Iranian targets to "open up the strait," "grab the uranium," and "target bad actors," an apparent embrace of assassination. Other Fox News hosts also pushed Trump to seek regime change in Iran, hosting retired Gen. Keith Kellogg, who called for "putting boots on the ground" and for the U.S. to seize Iranian territory. This was not commentary or news, it was Fox television personalities directly shaping foreign policy at the highest level.The doom loop is dangerousWhat makes this dynamic especially fraught is the structural relationship between Fox and the Trump administration. Trump has appointed more than two dozen former Fox News hosts into administration positions, blurring the line between media and government in an unprecedented way. When Trump calls into Fox & Friends, he is not just doing an interview — he is engaging a network with an inherent interest in promoting conflict and spectacle. Fox hosts also manipulate Trump with hyperbolic praise: when Trump ordered military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Sean Hannity said the strikes would "go down in history as one of the greatest military victories," while other hosts claimed Trump deserved "six Nobel Peace Prizes" and a spot on Mount Rushmore. Trump went on to demand—and expect— both honors.Fox's lockstep promotion of Trump's war reflects the network's calculated plan to keep MAGA enraged and engaged. War framed as a righteous confrontation with a Judeo-Christian undertones is good television. It generates ratings, emotional investment, and brand loyalty. It is what happens when the line between journalism and political advocacy dissolves. A network that functions as an echo chamber for a sitting president, with hosts who propose military strikes rather than analyze them, and treats war as a network ratings strategy, has abdicated its responsibility to the public and should be held to account. The feedback loop between Fox and the White House helped produce a war that cost American lives, roiled the global economy, and left our allies disgusted. Even if Trump’s MOU miraculously holds, analysts predict the global economy will take months and even years to recover.
If you sat down and tried to invent the worst possible person to put in charge of negotiating with the Islamic Republic of Iran — and obviously Donald Trump doesn’t count — you'd have no recourse but to choose JD Vance.If you didn’t know, and he takes every single opportunity to tell you, he’s the vice president of the United States. And your worst expectations will be met, because he’s leading the way when it comes to negotiating with the wily and wicked Iranian government.Vance, remember he’s the vice president, is fresh off a book tour for Communion, his memoir about finding his way to Catholicism. I am a lifelong Catholic and, like the Iran negotiations, if I have to invent the worst possible person to explain Catholicism to me, it would again be JD Vance.This joke of a negotiator and deity is now the face of the most consequential American diplomacy with Iran since arguably 1979. And this joke of a man and his reborn righteousness is now tasked to talk down a regime that has spent four decades building its identity around resisting and rebelling against American foreign policy.It's hard to imagine a worse match of temperament to task.I don’t know about you, but I had to pick myself up off the floor when I watched Vance’s press conference from the White House on Thursday. When asked what qualifies him to sit across from Iranian officials, Vance told reporters Joy Behar — who interviewed him on The View earlier in the week — is "way tougher than the Iranians," and that the two are "best friends now."To say that statement was baffling, bizarre, and ridiculous would be the understatement that trashes all understatements.Never mind that Behar, and her cohorts at The View, spent the interview grilling him over Trump calling the affordability crisis "a hoax" while Vance scrambled to spin it. The idea that sparring with an 83-year-old daytime talk show host is preparation for negotiating Iran's nuclear program is the kind of line that should disqualify a student from a high school Diplomacy 101 class.All I could think was that the Iranian delegation heard that quote — they hear everything — and jumped up and down at the prospect of going toe to toe with a neophyte negotiator.Negotiators who have outlasted six American presidents being told their toughest opponent in Washington uses Joy Behar as his measuring stick. It's not really an insult to Behar. In my previous career as a media relations guy for Kmart and Sears, we had several opportunities to interact, and Behar is as lovely as she is sharp and quick-witted.But tougher than Iran? It sounds like a self-deprecating remark Behar would make about herself.But those words from Vance are shocking. It's an admission. If you need a co-host of The View to prep you for the Strait of Hormuz, you've already lost the negotiation before it started.None of this would really matter much if Vance were just a motormouthed mouthpiece, which he is on his best days. But this? He's leading the actual talks, alongside Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, for an agreement that's supposed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restart nuclear inspections, and release frozen Iranian funds during a 60-day window before a final deal gets signed.Vance has spent days insisting the money picture is being overstated, even as Iran's own Revolutionary Guard puts out its own numbers. They are going to twist him in so many directions, and it should worry all of us that Vance is way over his head.It would help if Vance had any real track record here. He doesn't. The late Richard Holbrooke spent decades in the foreign service before he hammered out the Dayton Accords for Bill Clinton. Zalmay Khalilzad built a career across Republican and Democratic administrations before George W. Bush sent him to broker political settlements in Baghdad.And who led President Obama’s successful Iran nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA? His secretary of state, John Kerry, who was a U.S. senator for 28 years and chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee before President Obama appointed him to his Cabinet.And Ambassador Wendy Sherman, who worked in the State Department and served as President Bill Clinton’s North Korea policy coordinator, handling early negotiations regarding their nuclear and ballistic missile programs.And J.D. Vance? He spent two years in the Senate, wrote a book about converting to hillbillies and Catholicism, and went on The View. Can’t think of much else.By the way, Vance's Catholicism tells him a lot about sin and redemption. It tells him very little about Qom.Many Republicans — and Fox News — seem aghast at the danger, grumbling now about a war powers vote nobody in the GOP had the spine to force when the strikes started.
Paint seen peeling off in the water at pool site; investigation finds ICE agents disproportionately target people from Latin America – key US politics stories from Saturday 20 June at a glanceDonald Trump, without offering evidence, blamed “vandalism” for “real problems” at Washington’s reflecting pool after an algae bloom in the wake of a $14.2m renovation of the site that he declared would turn it “American flag” blue. Paint has been seen peeling off in the water. He also made claims that vandals had been arrested.Days after his administration claimed the pool was actually “crystal clear”, despite an unmistakably green hue, the US president acknowledged issues – and claimed there had been foul play. Continue reading...
