
Virginia Supreme Court throws out redistricting referendum results
The Virginia Supreme Court overturned the results of the state's redistricting referendum, which voters narrowly approved last month.Why it matters: The 4-3 ruling upends one of the most closely watched redistricting fights in the country.It follows months of legal challenges over whether the referendum was unconstitutional.The big picture: The Friday decision effectively blocks Democrats from redrawing congressional maps mid-decade.That's after the state spent $5.2 million to pay for the special election, and outside groups raised nearly $100 million to sway voters.The new map would have been in effect for the November midterms and was expected to shift the state's congressional split from 6-5 favoring Democrats to 10-1.Between the lines: It was a move Democrats said would've countered Republican-led states that redrew districts to add GOP seats in a closely divided U.S. House.Republicans, who have repeatedly sued to block the redistricting vote, have called it extreme, illegal and hyperpartisan.Zoom in: A central part of the case during oral arguments concerned what qualifies as the "next general election" under Virginia's constitution.Virginia law requires amendments to move through two General Assembly sessions: one before the House has an election (last November) and one after.Republicans have argued that lawmakers had improperly advanced the amendment after early voting for the 2025 House elections had already begun.Meanwhile, Democrats have said that an "election" is a single day in November.What they're saying: Siding with Republicans, the high court ruled that Virginia's "general election" includes the early voting period, not just Election Day.That violation "incurably taints" the referendum and invalidates the vote, per the ruling.The other side: Virginia House Speaker Don Scott, a Democrat, said in a statement, "We respect the decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia." But Attorney General Jay Jones blasted the ruling as politically motivated, accusing the court of putting "politics over the rule of law" and "silenc[ing] the voices" of Virginia voters.Jones said his office is reviewing "every legal pathway forward."Context: The state Supreme Court overturning voters' decision is rare, but it happened at least once in 1958, per Cardinal News.The high court ruled that Arlington residents had voted on an unconstitutional law in 1956 and struck down the election results.The intrigue: If Democrats appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, it wouldn't be the first time Virginia election disputes have landed there.In 2024, former Attorney General Jason Miyares won a last-minute U.S. Supreme Court ruling, allowing Virginia to resume its voter purge program days before Election Day.What we're watching: Whether Democrats take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.Editor's note: This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Go deeper: Virginia redistricting vote sets spending record
Compare Perspectives
Democrats get their Supreme Court victory—and immediately demand more justices
A favorable ruling from the “hyper-partisan” Supreme Court didn’t stop the left from returning to their court-packing narrative with full-throated fearmongering. “In the party of socialists and […]
Supreme Court Gives Republicans a Big Win with Campaign Finance Ruling
Republicans scored a victory Tuesday at the Supreme Court, and Vice President J.D. The post Supreme Court Gives Republicans a Big Win with Campaign Finance Ruling appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter turbocharges presidential power
The recent SCOTUS case greatly increased the power of the executive branch
Alarm bells as Supreme Court takes up major case it ducked last year: ex-DOJ prosecutor
The Supreme Court ended its most recent term on Tuesday with an announcement that it has “agreed to hear a case that asks them to determine whether bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles are constitutional,” wrote former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, who then warned that the end of controversial rulings has not come to an end.As she noted on her Substack platform, the Supreme Court is never really dormant and less so recently, using the so-called "shadow docket" to excess in the service of Donald Trump. With that in mind, she raised a red flag over a case involving the availability of assault-style weapons, which could lead to another controversial ruling.The significance is unmistakable, Vance wrote, explaining, "The Court doesn’t take cases like this just to pat a state on the head and sign off on its ban—it has bigger fish to fry than affirming the status quo."According to Vance, the case marks a dramatic reversal from just last year. In June 2025, the court declined to hear Snope v. Brown, a direct challenge to Maryland's semiautomatic rifle ban. But that decision masked a deeply fractured court teetering on the edge of upheaval.At the time, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an eight-page dissent from the denial, explaining: “This petition presents the question whether this ban is consistent with the Second Amendment. The Fourth Circuit held that it is, reasoning that AR–15s are not 'arms' protected by the Second Amendment … I would grant certiorari to review this surprising conclusion.”"That’s not the kind of language you use if you intend to affirm the ban," Vance suggested before noting that now the case will be taken up after getting the needed fourth vote to grant cert, pointing out that Justice Brett Kavanaugh once wrote, "a denial of certiorari does not mean that the Court agrees with a lower-court decision or that the issue is not worthy of review," before adding, "...in my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two.” "We don’t know if the four Justices picked up a fifth vote along the way that convinced Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh this was 'the right time,'” Vance warned.
The Supreme Court Didn’t Just Save Women’s Sports. It Preserved the Legal Rights of Women
The Court determined that biological sex should not give way to gender identity.
Live results: Colorado voters head to polls for House primaries
Voters in Colorado are at the polls Tuesday for House primary elections. All eyes are on the battleground 8th Congressional District where Republican Rep. Gabe Evans will learn his Democratic opponent. State Reps. Shannon Bird and Manny Rutinel are facing off for the Democratic nod to take on Evans. All other seven Colorado House members…
Live results: Bennet, Weiser duke it out in Democratic primary for Colorado governor
Sen. Michael Bennet and state Attorney General Phil Weiser are duking it out in a Tuesday Democratic primary to succeed term-limited Gov. Jared Polis. (D). Bennet holds key endorsements from state Democratic leaders, including Sen. John Hickenlooper and three of the five House Democrats from Colorado. Weiser, however, has run a formidable campaign in the…







