Supreme Court Ruling on Trans Athletes Leaves Advocates Crestfallen
The ruling upholding two state laws blocking transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports was the latest in a series of defeats.

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states can ban transgender girls from girls' school sports teams, handing conservative states a historic victory in their fight to restrict trans rights.Why it matters: The decision caps a yearslong, Republican-led push through statehouses and school boards to define girls' sports by sex assigned at birth.The case also hands that movement its sharpest weapon yet for coming fights over bathrooms, IDs and gender-affirming care.Driving the news: In West Virginia v. B.P.J., the justices held that the state's ban on trans girls in girls' sports does not violate either Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause.The court also upheld a similar Idaho law in Little v. Hecox.Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the 6–3 majority that "The Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women's and girls' sports throughout America."All nine justices agreed the ban was allowed under Title IX, but they disagreed about whether it was constitutional.The other side: Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the main dissent, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, arguing the court moved "the goalposts" by resolving the case without knowing all the facts."One can only hope that the same misguided approach does not and will not extend to other contexts tomorrow, when any of these considerations are missing," Sotomayor continued.Between the lines: Advocates for transgender students argued that categorical bans discriminate based on sex and transgender status.States defending the laws said sex-separated sports are lawful and necessary to protect fairness and opportunity for people assigned female at birth.Zoom in: B.P.J. is Becky Pepper-Jackson, the 16-year-old who challenged West Virginia's ban the summer before she began the sixth grade.She competed while the case ran through the courts, and won West Virginia's Class AAA state championship in shot put a month ago.Sotomayor noted Pepper-Jackson was the only trans girl publicly known to have sought to play girls sports in the state.What they're saying: President Trump celebrated the ruling on Truth Social, writing that it was a "BIG WIN."He wrote, "The United States Supreme Court just RULED AGAINST MEN PLAYING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS. Wow! That takes that ridiculous situation off the table!!!"What's next: Both cases head back to the lower courts, while states with similar laws are likely to cite it immediately in pending cases.Editor's note: This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
The ruling upholding two state laws blocking transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports was the latest in a series of defeats.
The BBC’s Gary O’Donoghue explains what the court's landmark ruling means for the US president.
The Supreme Court narrowly ruled Tuesday that Chinese nationals partaking in birth tourism schemes may continue to do so and receive citizenship for their babies, making it imperative that President Donald Trump implement a complete ban on travel from China. The high court held that “children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or […]
A divided US Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s planned restrictions on birthright citizenship, invalidating a central plank of his immigration agenda. Bloomberg Law Host June Grasso and Leon Fresco, Partner at Holland & Knight, discuss the ruling. (Source: Bloomberg)
Some Republican lawmakers are reigniting a push to amend the Constitution to end birthright citizenship after the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit the right under the 14th Amendment. The high court ruled 6-3 to strike down Trump’s order that would have ended citizenship for children born to parents […]
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff for policy, blasted the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling, calling it “destructive” and “outrageous.” The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment on Tuesday. The court invalidated Trump’s order and reaffirmed that birthright citizenship applies to children born […]
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused Clarence Thomas of echoing Dred Scott by opposing the birthright citizenship ruling under the 14th Amendment.
The ruling is a major setback for Donald Trump's immigration agenda, and has been welcomed by civil rights groups.