Alleged secret PR scheme involving JD Vance and Tucker Carlson revealed
A new book claims Vice President JD Vance pushed to enlist Tucker Carlson in an effort to clear President Donald Trump of any ties to Jeffrey Epstein. […]

President Donald Trump claimed Wednesday that 100 million barrels of oil had been transported through the Strait of Hormuz—much to the energy secretary’s surprise!In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that last month, he’d directed the military to conduct a “secret mission” to support the flow of energy through the essential trade passageway. “Today, I am pleased to announce that this effort has resulted in more than 100 MILLION Barrels of Oil making its way through the Strait, and into the Open Market,” Trump wrote.“More than 200 Commercial Ships have safely traveled through the Strait. This wildly successful effort is because the UNITED STATES of AMERICA CONTROLS the Strait of Hormuz—NOT Iran,” Trump wrote. “Their military is defeated, and their economy is lost. It’s over for Iran!”Trump’s sudden announcement came as he struggled to justify the U.S. economy reaching its highest annual inflation rate in three years—and the president’s impulsive social media posts haven’t helped the situation. It’s not clear whether Trump is actually telling the truth. His administration has a history of lying about this exact thing, and the president has a penchant for using the war with Iran to try to manipulate the stock market. Trump’s claim is already failing the smell test. When asked about the 100 million barrels of oil Wednesday, Energy Secretary Chris Wright appeared confused and said he was “unaware” of the operation.Ohio Representative Emilia Sykes pressed Wright on whether he thought Trump was lying. “I do not think the president is lying, I think the president is talking casually about our efforts to stop the flow of Iranian oil,” Wright said, though clearly Trump was talking about oil that had made it out, not oil that had been blocked. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump divulged more details about the operation.“You know we’ve been taking out millions of barrels of oil. Nobody knows it. You know who doesn’t know about it? Iran until right now,” Trump said. “We took out, the other night, 22 ships, late at night with no lights because they don’t have any radar because we blasted the crap out of it.”It’s no secret that some ships have been able to exit through the Strait of Hormuz. Last week, a U.S. defense official told CNBC that the U.S. was coordinating with ships seeking passage through the Strait of Hormuz, but was not escorting vessels. Lloyd’s List Intelligence reported last week that roughly 40 ships stranded in the Persian Gulf have been able to exit the strait. The numbers Trump is claiming would indicate clandestine energy flows of a far larger scale, but it’s worth noting that before the U.S. attacked Iran, an average of 20 million barrels of oil passed through the Strait of Hormuz every day. That means the transit of more than two billion barrels of oil has been stalled in the 103 days since the U.S. and Israel first launched military strikes against Iran. This story has been updated.
A new book claims Vice President JD Vance pushed to enlist Tucker Carlson in an effort to clear President Donald Trump of any ties to Jeffrey Epstein. […]
Trump's U.S. ambassador to Turkey is accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein find a personal assistant who became both a recruiter and a victim in his sex trafficking network, Raw Story has learned.Sarah Kellen told members of the House Oversight Committee last month that she was working as a host at the W Hotel in Honolulu in 2001 when she was recruited to work for Epstein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell. A woman working as an intern at the hotel’s front desk befriended her and told her about the opportunity.Kellen told the committee that Epstein had helped get the woman, whose name is redacted from an interview transcript, an internship at the W “because he was friends with Tom Barrack," who owned the hotel.Kellen said she didn’t realize at the time that Epstein and Maxwell were her prospective employers.“She never told me his name,” Kellen told members of the committee, chaired by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), during her May 21 interview. “She just told me there was a wealthy couple in New York that was looking for a new traveling assistant and if I would be interested. She had taken some risqué photos of me earlier, and I learned that she had sent them to Jeffrey, and then she started telling me about the job opportunity.”Barrack, a key diplomatic player for the Trump administration in the Middle East as ambassador to Turkey and special presidential envoy for Syria and Iraq, has not commented publicly about his well-documented, decades-long relationship with Epstein. His role in potentially connecting Kellen with Epstein has not been previously reported.The start of Kellen’s employment with Epstein and Maxwell overlaps with a period when the couple was friendly with the future president and first lady. Donald Trump told New York magazine in October 2002 that he had known Epstein for 15 years and that he was “a lot of fun to be with,” adding, “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”The friendship between Epstein and Trump, along with Barrack, is detailed in the book Fire and Fury by Michael Wolff, which describes the three as “a 1980s and ’90s set of nightlife Musketeers.”A billionaire real estate investor, Barrack reportedly introduced Trump to Paul Manafort, his first campaign chairman during the 2016 campaign. Manafort was later convicted of crimes related to his political consulting work for a pro-Russia party in Ukraine.A prolific fundraisier for the Trump campaign, Barrack spoke at the 2016 Republican National Convention, and following Trump’s election, chaired the 2017 inauguration committee.Before that, Barrack reportedly leveraged his business connections in the Middle East to smooth over distrust among Gulf Arab leaders following Trump’s call early in the campaign for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering” the United States. The effort appeared to pay dividends when Trump made the first international trip of his first term, a visit to a summit in Saudi Arabia. The close relationship between Trump and the Gulf states has continued into the second administration, with the government of Qatar giving a plane to the president. Tom Barrack described Donald Trump as "one of my closest friends for forty years" during his speech at the 2016 Republican National Convention.Courtesy C-SpanIn 2022, Barrack was acquitted of charges that he acted as an unregistered foreign agent for the United Arab Emirates during the 2016 campaign. Now, as a U.S. diplomat stationed in Ankara, he praises the partnership between the two countries as being "of critical importance to the Middle East," and recently claimed credit for processing visas for the Iranian team so they could travel to the United States to compete in the World Cup.Epstein, who would be indicted for sex trafficking in July 2019, appeared to view himself as the odd-man-out during Trump’s ascent to power, while Barrack quietly assisted.Summarizing Wolff’s Fire and Fury in a January 2018 email, Landon Thomas Jr. — author of the 2002 New York profile — reported to Epstein: “There are a few paragraphs on you, TB, DJT partying around NYC in 90s etc. — and then MW says you are airbrushed out of DJT history while Barrack sticks around.”“I know,” Epstein replied.Raw Story was unable to reach Barrack for comment through the State Department or the U.S. Embassy in Ankara.In 2012, Epstein credited Barrack with connecting him to Kellen in an email to another employee to arrange for a visit by Barrack and Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, then the ruling emir of Qatar who was interested in buying Epstein’s New York townhouse.Epstein had planned to be in Paris at the time of the visit. In an email, he instructed an unidentified employee to be ready to receive the guests “well dressed” and in “heels.”“It’s Tom Barrack coming, so you can tell him I thank him every day for Sarah,” Epstein added.
The dispatching of top officials underscores the island remains a top US target
The president himself has repeatedly contradicted that claim.
President Trump has been on a roll of rhetorical missteps that could come back to bite Republicans in the midterms.Why it matters: Trump has served up a platter of ready-made campaign ads to Democrats, suggesting he's fine with rising prices and unconcerned about Americans' financial struggles.Driving the news: Trump delivered three eye-popping quotes in the span of a month:"I don't think about Americans' financial situation," he said on May 12.Two weeks later, on May 27, Trump said, "I don't care about the midterms."And when Trump was asked Wednesday about the latest inflation numbers showing a 4.2% rise in prices, he responded, "I love the inflation."The big picture: Michael Kinsley famously defined a gaffe as "when a politician tells the truth — some obvious truth he isn't supposed to say."Trump's gaffes revealed something different: not an inconvenient truth, but the truth as he wishes it to be.Zoom in: The first came in mid-May, when Trump said, "I don't think about Americans' financial situation." His point was that he wouldn't let domestic financial pain prevent him from stopping Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. But that nuance is likely to be lost in the heat of campaign season."The president could have chosen different words, but this is what he thinks," a Trump adviser told Axios at the time. Two days later, Trump told Fox News it was "a perfect statement. I'd make it again."Trump's "I don't care about the midterms" remark came as he argued against letting Iran exploit the U.S. political calendar as leverage in the war.In the Oval Office Wednesday, Trump was asked about inflation hitting a three-year high. "You know what I really love? I love the inflation," he said, before predicting that prices would drop "like a rock" once the war in Iran is over.Between the lines: Trump's remarks — and his refusal to walk them back — show how consumed he is with winning the war, no matter the political cost to congressional Republicans.The party has pleaded for him to turn his attention to cost-of-living issues, but Trump has made clear that Iran is his priority.The context: Compounding the problem for Republicans, Trump has pushed for hundreds of millions of dollars for a White House ballroom and $1.8 billion for an "anti-weaponization" fund that could've benefited people who participated in the Jan. 6 attacks.The bipartisan pushback to both ideas revealed how hard they were for Republicans to defend.By the numbers: Just 29% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the economy, while 63% disapprove — his worst numbers on the issue in either term, according to an Economist/YouGov poll out this week.Even at his 2023 low, former President Biden's economic approval never fell below 39%, according to the same Economist/YouGov polling — 10 points above where Trump sits now.The other side: Trump told the New York Post on Wednesday that he meant to say that he loved that inflation wasn't higher."Despite the fact that we're in a war, the numbers are much lower than anticipated, and when we're out of that war, the numbers will be at lower numbers than they were even before it started," he said."Delivering economic relief for the American people has been a Day One priority for the Trump administration," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement, pointing to tax cuts and drug pricing deals.The bottom line: Congressional Republicans are focused on winning an election. Trump is focused on winning a war.
American political history is rife with examples of corruption. The period after the Civil War was known then as the Great Barbecue, when ethics broke down in public life. There were embezzling treasurers, bribe-giving lobbyists, purchased newspapermen, and swindlers at the public trough. But the Trump administration has just tried to pull off a corrupt deal so brazen it would make Reconstruction-era crooks blush. Good people, including West Virginia’s Congressional delegation, cannot look the other way.In West Virginia, we’ve had our share of corruption, but usually we have been able to right the ship and send the scoundrels packing, sometimes off to jail. Neither political party is immune. We’ve sent Governors Wally Barron (a Democrat) and Arch Moore (a Republican) to prison. And the entire political structure of Logan County has to be cleaned out periodically. But Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service and his proposed settlement are something else entirely. They set up a massive raid on the U.S. Treasury to be paid for by taxpayers.Trump v. Internal Revenue ServiceMost Presidential candidates disclose their tax returns. Trump frequently promised to do so, but never did. No wonder. In 2016 and again in 2017, Trump, a billionaire, paid $750 in taxes. In 10 of the previous 15 years, he paid no taxes whatsoever. We know this because a contractor for the IRS copied and then disclosed Trump’s tax returns to the news media. This was a crime, and the contractor is now serving a five-year sentence.In January 2026, Trump sued the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service for $10 billion. He did this as a private citizen, not as president. In his lawsuit, Trump claimed that the contractor was an IRS employee who was improperly supervised. But the last time I checked, President Trump was in charge of the entire executive branch, including the Treasury Department and the IRS. He appointed the Secretary of the Treasury and the Commissioner of the IRS and can remove them whenever they displease him. So Trump is essentially suing himself. But wait, the cheese gets even stinkier.A court has no jurisdiction over a made-up controversy because there is no true adversity to resolve. That would include situations where one party is trying to sue himself, say to recover insurance money. When Trump v. IRS was filed, the judge questioned whether this was just such a made-up case. But before the Justice Department answered the judge’s concern, or put up the first defense, the parties announced that they had “settled” the case and asked the judge to dismiss it. The lawyers for the American people caved to a lawsuit filed by their boss without a fight.Terms of the settlementNeither Trump’s lawyers nor the Justice Department disclosed the settlement agreement to the judge. If they had, she would have seen that Trump demanded a $1.776 billion fund to compensate people he believes were unfairly treated by the federal government, including the people who were involved in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. These are the same people who attacked police, paraded through the Capitol with Confederate flags, and defecated on the floor. Many of them were convicted of federal crimes for this, but were later pardoned by our President. This giveaway would be funded by U.S. taxpayers.In response to a huge backlash on this proposed compensation fund for criminals, even from his own party, Trump is backing down — for now. This followed a ruling in Virginia on May 29 that halted any activity to set up the fund or make payments from it. But in testimony before Congress, Todd Blanche, acting head of the Justice Department, refused to put in writing that the Trump Administration is abandoning the idea permanently.There is a second aspect of the settlement Trump refuses to abandon that is blatantly corrupt. Trump demanded a provision in the settlement agreement that the U.S. be “forever barred and precluded” from examining or prosecuting Trump, his sons and the Trump Organization over past tax filings. This is complete overreach. Immunity from past tax infractions has nothing to do with the leak of Trump’s tax returns, which was the reason for the lawsuit in the first place. But the Justice Department was happy to give Trump anything he wanted.An IRS inquiry now pending could reveal that Trump owes over $100 million in tax liability, penalties, and interest. Who will make up for the shortfall in revenue if these millions aren’t paid? The taxpayers will. The Wall Street Journal has called this deal “extraordinary and unprecedented.” The New York Times called the immunity from audit a “staggering public benefit.” Why should Trump get a deal no other taxpayer can get, at huge taxpayer expense, to settle a made-up lawsuit? He got this self-serving deal because he controls almost everyone involved in making it.Where we go from hereBut Trump does not control the federal judge who is presiding in the case.
The U.S. launched air strikes on Iran for a second consecutive day. And, the World Cup kicks off today in Mexico City, where tensions threaten to disrupt events.
President Donald Trump has had one clear economic statistic he could brag about — but the new inflation data shows even that is gone now.Specifically, inflation-adjusted wage gains, which were relatively strong even into Trump's term as inflation worsened, have been essentially wiped out with the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics data, according to Axios.The new development, according to the report, "shows how the recent energy-driven inflation surge is eating into household purchasing power," with inflation-adjusted compensation for workers now only 0.1 percent higher since January 2025 — essentially flat.This comes as Trump's war in Iran has led to the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world's oil passes, being practically shut down, disrupting world energy markets and causing prices to surge everywhere. Trump reportedly considered ending the war without a resolution on the Strait at one point.For his part, the president denies anything wrong with the current economy, and even went so far as to proclaim, "I love the inflation." He has also claimed he's solving the Strait of Hormuz crisis by secretly transporting 100 million barrels of oil, a claim that couldn't be verified.