The Knicks’ surreal Game 4 win is in a New York sports class of its own
Friends, New Yorkers, Knicks fans, lend me your ears; I come not to bury That Game but to praise it. So … how much time ya got?

President Trump’s announcement that a deal has been reached with Iran and approved by “all parties involved” is confusing everyone. The Israeli government is not aware that a finalized deal has been reached, an official told the country’s Channel 12, and it’s unclear where the Iranian government stands. Fars, a semiofficial news agency affiliated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, quoted an “informed source close to Iran’s negotiation team,” who said that “no text for a preliminary memorandum of understanding with the United States has been approved.”Axios, citing unnamed sources, reported that Iran and Qatari mediators believed they had come up with a written agreement Wednesday that the U.S. would accept. Those sources said that Iran told different countries on Thursday that an agreement was reached in principle but was still waiting for Iranian leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s final approval.Trump announced on Truth Social Thursday afternoon that the deal had been approved by “the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, and others.” He made things even weirder shortly later in the Oval Office, saying that a signing ceremony could take place with Iran this weekend in Europe, which he would not be able to attend due to the planned UFC fight on the White House lawn Sunday.“The [Strait of Hormuz] will be open as soon as we sign, which could be soon, very soon, maybe over the weekend in Europe. I won’t be able to be there, but, uh, [JD Vance] will be there, vice president, and some of the people, [Steve Witkoff] did a great job, [Jared Kushner],” Trump said, mentioning the people he had tasked with negotiating with Iran.Trump says the Iran deal signing ceremony will happen this weekend in Europe but "I won't be able to be there" (the UFC fight at the White House is Sunday) pic.twitter.com/K5tvLgLuqP— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 11, 2026Does this mean a deal is imminent, or is Trump just blowing hot air again? From what the president is saying, it’s either done or very close, but there’s no clear confirmation from Iran, and U.S. ally Israel doesn’t seem to be aware of anything, either. For the sake of international stability, one would expect everyone to be on the same page. But unfortunately, this is how Trump has chosen to operate.
Friends, New Yorkers, Knicks fans, lend me your ears; I come not to bury That Game but to praise it. So … how much time ya got?
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) shot back at President Donald Trump on Thursday, saying she would get "revenge" after the president turned on her, The Hill reported. Mace, who lost her primary race for South Carolina's governor against a Trump-backed candidate, had a sharp response to the president. "People keep asking me: 'Will you get revenge on Trump for ending your political career?' The answer is yes. I'll be adding to the unemployment number in January," Mace wrote on X.Trump had endorsed South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pam Evette in the crowded gubernatorial primary race. Mace finished last in the Republican primary. She attributed Trump's snub to her support for releasing the Epstein Files, which Trump opposed. Her term ends in January 2027.Republican candidates Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson will face off on June 23 in the runoff.Actor Rob Schneider, a Trump supporter and conservative, voiced his support for Mace on Wednesday in a post on X."Never thought I’d get my Congressional send-off from Deuce Bigalow," Mace wrote on X. "Don’t worry sir, I promise to be more of a menace than ever. There is nothing to hold me back."People keep asking me: "Will you get revenge on Trump for ending your political career?"The answer is yes. I'll be adding to the unemployment number in January.— Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) June 11, 2026
A federal appeals court is allowing President Donald Trump to collect his temporary 10% global tariffs for now while the legal challenges against the trade levies proceed through the judicial system. In a Thursday ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., concluded the Trump administration‘s case in defense of […]
President Trump ripped RINO Senators, Mitch McConnell and Lisa Murkowski on Thursday during remarks to reporters in the Oval Office. The post President Trump Rips Into Mitch McConnell During Oval Office Event (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
President Trump had previously been amping up his rhetoric against Iran.
President Donald Trump says the US “just made a great settlement of the war with Iran, and we’re going to be subject to finalization of documents.” Trump says a final deal could be signed within days. He spoke at the White House Thursday. (Source: Bloomberg)
David Hale, Former US ambassador to Pakistan and Lebanon, and Dana Stroul, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, discuss President Trump’s announcement of a potential deal with Iran, including questions over what has been agreed to, whether Iran’s leadership is aligned, and how the US and Israel may approach the next phase of negotiations. They speak with Kailey Leinz on the late edition of Bloomberg’s "Balance of Power." (Source: Bloomberg)
A federal judge in Florida appointed by President Donald Trump just nine months ago seethed at the administration in a new ruling, accusing them of cooking up a flimsy excuse to bypass his own judgment in favor of a career official within the administration itself.Judge Kyle Dudek's ruling concerned the immigration detention case of Dmitrii Iastrebov, a noncitizen who has been sitting in lockup without a proper hearing — only for the Trump administration to argue that the administration's own appointed immigration judge, rather than the U.S. district judge, should be the final word on the matter.This case, wrote Dudek, "borders on the surreal ... an immigration judge refused to hold the ordered hearing, claiming Iastrebov is not covered by § 1226(a) and thus ineligible for bond. Instead of defending this Court’s mandate, the Government’s counsel acquiesced in that refusal and waived any administrative appeal. Now, faced with a renewed habeas petition, the Government casually announces that its previous concession 'was in error' and asks this Court to reverse itself and hold that Iastrebov is instead subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225.""The Government was right the first time," wrote Dudek. "And its request for a do-over here is not just legally unsupportable, it is a masterclass in litigation cynicism. A federal court is not a testing lab where the Executive branch can pilot a concession to get a case closed, stand by silently while its own administrative process flouts the resulting mandate, and then stroll back in demanding a clean slate. Give me a break."Iastrebov's right to a hearing, the judge continued, has already been litigated "in painstaking detail ... and because the Government has shown that it cannot follow this Court’s explicit directions and offers zero assurance that it will comply with the statutory process it previously championed, Iastrebov will be immediately released."This court loss comes after a series of other legal defeats for Trump on various aspects of immigration policy, including a judge in Massachusetts striking down Trump's $100,000 fee for high-skilled immigrant workers.