Facing bipartisan criticism of Iran deal, Trump lashes out at "fools"
Republican Senators Bill Cassidy, Thom Tillis and Ted Cruz have been critical of the 14-point memorandum of understanding signed on Wednesday.

Why, oh why does everyone jump through hoops when Donald Trump announces yet another deal with Iran? It’s become such a joke that when “breaking news” notifications pop up on my phone these days, I always say to myself, “Trump’s touting another Iran deal.”Only a fool would believe Trump when he says a deal is “complete.” Because once again, the man who wrote The Art of the Deal, or more accurately, paid Tony Schwartz to write it, says a deal is done. It is set to be signed this Friday in Geneva, and the entire world is responding the way it always does: by believing something Trump says and breathing yet another sigh of relief.This war has been a shambolic, haphazard pigsty of epic proportions. Come to think of it, didn’t J.D. Vance go to Pakistan to sign a deal? Or was it Marco Rubio? Or was it Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff? Or did they all go together? Or did they go to Qatar?See what I mean?Yes, I know there was a preliminary deal signed on Monday, but...Here’s what we supposedly have. The U.S. and Iran say they’ve reached an agreement to end more than 100 days of war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, lift the U.S. blockade — and God knows what it'll do about Iran’s nuclear program.Trump stated over the weekend and on Monday that Iran no longer wants to pursue nuclear weapons. That comment defies explanation and forces you to let go of any sense of reality.The formal signing is scheduled for Friday in Switzerland, mediated by Pakistan and Qatar. I guess you have to invite them at this point. Maybe everyone thinks the third time is a charm? Or is this the fourth attempt to sign a deal?Trump is telling reporters the actual text of the memorandum “may not be released until after Friday.” Which means nobody knows what the hell they are going to sign on Friday because, just like the war, this so-called memorandum is a shambolic, haphazard pigsty.But details are leaking. There are reports that Iran will receive a whopping $300 billion for reconstruction. Only an idiotic fool would hand this intensely crooked regime that absurd amount of money, And Trump says the Strait of Hormuz will be open. But it appears there’s a significant diplomatic dispute over Iran's plan to charge commercial vessels, because the strait’s territorial waters belong exclusively to Iran and Oman, Tehran asserts it has the legal right to co-manage the waterway and levy chargesWho can trust either side? And more pointedly, who can trust Iran to begin with, let alone trust them to sign something 72 hours away? Then there’s Netanyahu, who you’d think might have an opinion on a deal involving his own backyard. Yet his office released a statement clarifying that Israel isn’t even a party to it.Iran says one thing. Trump boasts about another. Iran says what Trump says isn’t true. Israel and Lebanon exchange fire. Iran makes an irrational, late stage demand. American officials say that’s not how any of this works.And on and on.If this all feels familiar, it’s because we’ve watched this before. Donald Trump has always, from his earliest days, failed to shepherd lasting deals to successful completion.Back in 1983, a younger Donald Trump bought himself a football team, the New Jersey Generals, and by 1986, it all went bankrupt.He decided the USFL’s best move was to challenge the NFL head-on in court with an antitrust lawsuit Trump was sure would force a merger or a massive payout.He testified. He guaranteed victory. He bloviated. And the USFL did, technically, win. A jury found the NFL had acted as a monopoly. The prize? One dollar, tripled to three under antitrust law.The league folded within days, and Trump walked away from the wreckage of a deal he’d personally engineered with nothing to show for it but failure. And 40 years later, we have the same mess, but with much bigger stakes, and still the same failure of a man trying to win. He will lose. He always does.That’s the Trump pattern. Announce it loudly, skimp on the details, let everyone else clean up later. A “very strong memorandum of understanding,” that Trump himself admits is “a little conceptual,” is not a peace deal.This reminded me of the September 2024 presidential debate, when pressed on his decade-long promise to replace the Affordable Care Act, Trump famously blurted out, “I have concepts of a plan.” Doesn’t that sound familiar to “a little conceptual?”One wonders what happened to those “concepts?”Finally, there’s one aspect of this fragile deal that could kaput the whole thing: Trump’s Truth Social ramblings, attacks, and verbosity.His short fuse and fat, fast fingers could blow the whole thing apart. If Iran makes a noncommittal statement, or if someone says Trump is TACO’ing again, or doing what Obama did with this shoddy Iran deal, Trump won’t be able to control himself. He will flail.And Iran will say, OK, if that’s how you feel, we ain’t signing.
Republican Senators Bill Cassidy, Thom Tillis and Ted Cruz have been critical of the 14-point memorandum of understanding signed on Wednesday.
President Trump blasted critics of the Iran deal as "fools" for not thinking he was tough on Tehran, describing them as "either jealous, bad people, or stupid."
After a full day of criticism of his Iran peace deal, President Donald Trump finally had enough and went off on Truth Social in the wee hours of the morning.As Republicans and Democrats alike have lined up against him, with Nikki Haley, Trump’s former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, writing on X, “If this is true, Iran wins,” after details were released, the president labeled his critics “fools.”According to NBC News, Trump’s deal will be a “tough sale,” with one DC insider confiding, “It’s an embarrassing way to get out of this, but I think everyone just wants to get out of it.”Nonetheless, the president snarled on Truth Social, “These fools, who think I haven’t been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are 'tumbling' down, are either jealous, bad people, or stupid. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT”
Finally, after 210 official ticker-tape parades, the Knicks get their turn to enter the Canyon of Heroes.
President Donald Trump was originally scheduled to sign a hard copy of the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding in Switzerland on Friday, but evidently sealing the deal and reopening the Strait of Hormuz couldn't wait.Flanked by French President Emmanuel Macron and French first lady Brigitte Macron and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio looming behind him, Trump signed the deal at the Palace of Versailles on Wednesday night, stating, "This was not easy, I can tell you."'Reagan is rolling over in his grave.'Pakistani President Shehbaz Sharif, a key mediator during the peace talks, subsequently noted that the agreement is now in effect, meaning — as a first step — Iran will "instantly reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the United States of America will immediately lift the naval blockade." The White House hailed the agreement as a great achievement."Following the historic destruction of Iran's military capabilities through the successful Operation Epic Fury, President Trump and his negotiating team have brokered an excellent, performance-based MOU that advances the interests of the United States by ending the fighting, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to significantly lower energy prices, and forcing Iran to commit to abandon its nuclear ambitions," stated White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales.RELATED: 'Too many people are being killed': Trump blasts Israel over Lebanon strikes as Iran peace deal hangs in the balance Alex Wong/Getty ImagesFollowing the signing, gasoline prices dropped and U.S. Treasury and stock futures rebounded.Democrats in Congress, Iran hawks, and several Israeli officials have complained incessantly in recent days about the agreement. On Wednesday, however, Republican lawmakers were among the loudest critics of the textual prelude to a final peace agreement.After sharing critiques by others troubled by the peace deal, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told The Hill, "History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal."Cruz seems to have been referring to the sixth of the agreement's 14 points, which states, "The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran."Cruz recycled these remarks in an interview with the Daily Wire, where he emphasized his support for Trump's decision "to initiate military action against Iran."Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Republican who finished a distant third in the Louisiana GOP Senate primary last month, similarly chimed in on Wednesday, writing, "Reagan is rolling over in his grave.""Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future," continued Cassidy. "Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal.""This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades," added the departing senator.Failed presidential candidate Nikki Haley and Sen. Thom Tillis — the retiring North Carolina Republican whom Trump called a "loser" and an "angry man" earlier this month — also aired their concerns.Tillis suggested that the U.S. was "equivocating" on some of the goals set earlier in the conflict; emphasized the need for "accountability for Iran"; insinuated that the agreement is the result of the administration "getting a bit skittish over the economic consequences of going to war to begin with"; and said he prefers a deal that won't just last through the remainder of Trump's terms but for multiple generations."Hitting Iran’s nuclear and missile sites was the right move," wrote Haley. "Now, we plan to unlock billions of dollars and lift sanctions, with the promise of even more money. They will use that money the way they always do — to further their nuclear ambitions and on terrorist proxies against us. It’s a huge mistake to pay to rebuild the threat we just destroyed."Not all champions of the war, however, condemned the deal.South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote, "It is my opinion that signing the MOU will be beneficial to the United States, in as much as the Strait of Hormuz will begin to open, and the hostilities with Iran will stop."While casting doubt on whether a final deal could be reached, Graham emphasized that signing the agreement constituted an "essential step" to creating economic stability for the U.S., the region, and the world, a step he regards as a prerequisite for "the expansion of the Abraham Accords and normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel."Trump evidently caught wind of all the pearl-clutching and weighed in on Thursday morning, stating on Truth Social, "These fools, who think I haven't been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are 'tumbling' down, are either jealous, bad...
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss the war with Iran as the White House continues to negotiate the terms to a memorandum of understanding. NBC News Capitol Hill Correspondent Melanie Zanona reports on the FISA debate on Capitol Hill as DNI nominee Jay Clayton’s confirmation is delayed amid the president’s frustrations with Congress.
President Trump made the case for his deal with Iran during an hour-long press conference on Wednesday, while seeming to lower his own bar for success and warning he could bomb Iran again if nuclear talks fail.The big picture: For two months, Trump has been seeking a deal to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and stabilize global energy markets. This deal should achieve that. But some of Trump's critics argue that making concessions just to return to status quo ante shows the war itself was a costly mistake.Reality check: Before the war and as it got underway, Trump laid out highly ambitious parameters for any successful resolution with Iran.That included "total surrender" and the full dismantlement of Iran's nuclear program. No enrichment, no ballistic missiles, no funding for proxies. Trump even wanted a say in picking the supreme leader. The memorandum of understanding — which Trump signed on Wednesday and senior administration officials finally unveiled in full in a call with reporters — is a much more modest agreement. Breaking it down: Iran gets sanctions relief to sell oil, the strait reopens, the blockade lifts. The parties also give themselves 60 days to negotiate a nuclear deal. Iran could see all sanctions lifted and receive billions in frozen funds and investments, if it agrees to limit its nuclear program and "dispose of" its stockpile.Trump and his team acknowledge a final deal may never happen. But he claimed on Wednesday that "if it doesn't get done in 60 days, we go back to bombing." (He later said the deadline could shift.)Uncharacteristically, Trump downplayed the deal somewhat, noting that it was just a memorandum. He also further enraged hawks by expressing sympathy for Iran's desire to possess missiles and pursue nuclear energy.Between the lines: Trump has been under fire from Democrats and GOP hawk ever since details of the MOU began leaking out.A senior administration official told reporters that Iran had requested the document not be published until it was formally signed, and that the delay "caused a lot of consternation" in the White House.Trump's team won over one critic, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who endorsed the deal after an hour-long phone call with White House envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday morning.Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), on the other hand, claimed "Reagan is rolling over in his grave" over "the worst foreign policy blunder in decades."Referring to the circling hawks, Trump said "the tough guys... would would take the country down the tube" and were "stupid" for wanting to continue bombing Iran.What he's saying: In a recognition of the bind Iran put him in by closing the strait, Trump said he didn't want to kick off an economic "catastrophe" and become another Herbert Hoover, who presided over the Great Depression.He argued that the U.S. military objectives, such pummeling Iran's navy, had been achieved. Trump said the MOU creates a path to limit Iran's nuclear program for the long term. And he said U.S. allies in Europe and the Middle East — with the possible exception of Israel — wanted to see the war end and the deal signed.Friction point: There's plenty in the deal for critics to sink their teeth into.It only calls on Iran to open the strait without restrictions for 60 days, leaving open the possibility of tolls after that. A senior U.S. official told reporters that wouldn't happen, because Gulf countries wouldn't sign up to any deal that allowed it.The MOU also calls for a plan to establish a $300 billion fund to rebuild Iran. Trump denied the U.S. would contribute money to such a fund, and U.S. officials said it was more about the potential for investments after a nuclear deal — such as allowing the UAE to build a power plant in Iran. Despite the administration's claims that this was entirely a "pay for performance" deal, the text makes clear that Iran will receive sanctions waivers to sell oil freely as long as negotiations are ongoing.The U.S. officials claimed the practical implications would be limited because Iran is already exporting oil to China.The MOU says nothing about Iran's ballistic missiles or support for terrorist organizations and militias in the region, despite Trump's insistence — dating back to his first term — that any deal with Iran would have to cover those issues."They have to have some because other people have some," Trump said. "Missiles aren't the problem."What to watch: A senior U.S. official said the meeting in Switzerland on Friday between a U.S. delegation headed by Vice President Vance and an Iranian delegation headed by parliamentary speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf would be "critical" to shifting into nuclear talks. The official claimed a "gentleman's agreement" had been reached around Iran's planned nuclear concessions, and the U.S.
Trump has insisted the deal ensures that Iran will never buy, develop or produce a nuclear weapon. But text of the agreement falls short of that.