Trump's Iran counterproposal calls for no nuclear weapons: Reports
"The one guarantee that I have to have is that there will be no nuclear weapons,” Trump said.

Democratic governors and lawmakers across the nation have devised an "unusual" plan to cripple President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization fund” designed to award taxpayer-funded payouts to his supporters – including violent Jan. 6 Capitol rioters – a strategy that would deny recipients a single penny from the fund, The Washington Post reported Sunday.“It's simple: If you're a New Yorker who takes from Trump's illegal January 6th slush fund, NY will tax 100% of it,” said Alex Bores, a New York assemblymember and Democratic Congressional candidate. “If you storm the Capitol and you take from the slush fund, too bad, we’re taking it.”The fund was offered as a settlement to Trump in exchange for him dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a suit he filed over his tax returns leaking in 2019. At $1.8 billion, the fund was established to compensate those who claim to have been unfairly targeted by the Biden administration’s Justice Department (DOJ), including those who have been convicted of assaulting police officers on Jan. 6.While a federal judge on Friday temporarily halted the Trump administration from doling out payments, Democrats across the nation are still mobilizing behind what the Post called the “unusual strategy” en masse.“It’s an action we look forward to taking,” said California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who endorsed the idea to tax payouts from Trump’s fund at a rate of 100%.New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul voiced support for the plan as well, telling reporters last week that she had “no problem with there being consequences for people who accept that money,” the Post reported.The Democratic leader in the Wisconsin state Senate, Dianne Hesselbein, voiced support for the plan, the Post reported, as did Sen. Michael Bennett (D-CO). Trump’s DOJ, however, had a less than favorable impression of the plan.“Instead of flaunting their love of lawfare and taxing constituents into oblivion, blue-state governors should focus on preventing more of their residents from fleeing in droves to free states with lower taxes, less crime, and governments that actually serve the people they represent,” said Natalie Baldassarre, a DOJ spokesperson, in a statement issued to the Post.I just introduced the Anti-Insurrectionist Act in NY. It's simple: If you're a New Yorker who takes from Trump's illegal January 6th slush fund, NY will tax 100% of it. pic.twitter.com/9vg5EKPybZ— Alex Bores (@AlexBores) May 26, 2026
"The one guarantee that I have to have is that there will be no nuclear weapons,” Trump said.
Republican Rep. Nancy Mace responded to being snubbed by President Donald Trump by posting a public declaration of loyalty on Saturday, touting a "100% lifetime voting record supporting Trump" — a move that drew immediate ridicule from critics on the left and the right, including some of Trump's most devoted online supporters.Mace, who is running for governor of South Carolina and had been seeking Trump's endorsement, appeared to be auditioning for his support with the post despite Trump already formally endorsing her opponent. Even MAGA world wasn't buying it.Catturd, one of Trump's most prominent social media boosters, called it out directly. "This is so cringe because Trump didn't endorse her," he wrote.George Santos, the former congressman convicted of fraud, was equally dismissive. "This is misleading," Santos wrote. "Mace is not endorsed by President Trump and has been snubbed by most of MAGA due to her insane meltdowns and insanity."Jonah Goldberg, the conservative commentator and co-founder of The Dispatch, skipped the words entirely and responded with a GIF captioned with "so thirsty."Critics outside the MAGA world went further. Libertarian leader Caryn Ann Harlos offered a one-line translation: "She is an empty brain."Anthony Sisk, a business strategist, dug up Mace's history, reminding her that she distanced herself from Trump in the immediate aftermath of January 6, 2021, when she believed his political career was finished. "What'd you do just 2 months after voting Trump in 2020 when you thought his political career was over?" Sisk wrote. "Cut and ran with the establishment. You're not cut out to be Governor."Political commentator David Marcus noted the episode could serve as a meaningful test of Trump's endorsement power, observing that Mace is harder to dismiss as an obstructionist than other Republicans Trump has targeted.Trump has not publicly responded to Mace's loyalty declaration.This is so cringe because Trump didn’t endorse her. 🤮 https://t.co/3NyRijhwOm— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) May 31, 2026
MSNOW Host Jonathan Capehart appeared on PBS this weekend and claimed that Joe Biden's health was examined closely by the media and the public, then suggested that Trump is getting a pass on the same issue. The post MSNOW Host Claims Joe Biden’s Health Was ‘Litigated Exhaustively’ But Trump’s Health is Getting a Pass (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Jonathan Reiner, the cardiologist who served as Vice President Dick Cheney's physician and has become one of the most prominent medical voices scrutinizing presidential health disclosures, raised several pointed questions over the weekend about President Donald Trump's latest physical, starting with why the president received a second coronary artery CT scan just six months after his last one."We don't typically scan patients 6 months later unless we are concerned about a finding on the initial scan," Reiner wrote on X. "What prompted the repeat CT?"That was just the first of seven questions Reiner posed about the exam conducted by White House physician Dr. Barbabella, whose overall assessment was that Trump is in good health.Reiner also flagged a discrepancy in how the report described Trump's ankle swelling, noting it stated the condition had "improved compared with last year" when Trump's previous exam had recorded no ankle edema at all. He questioned why Trump is taking a dose of aspirin four times higher than what is recommended for cardiovascular protection, and asked about bruising on Trump's left hand that the report did not address.He also noted that Trump has now undergone at least three MOCA cognitive screenings in recent years and asked why another was administered. The MOCA, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment, is a tool used to detect early signs of cognitive impairment.Reiner further questioned whether the White House medical team had evaluated Trump's "apparent daytime fatigue and sleepiness," and pushed back on the report's use of an AI tool to assess Trump's "heart age" as equivalent to that of a 66-year-old, calling it "not a clinically utilized tool."Trump himself referred to the visit as a "semi-annual physical," which prompted Reiner's final question: why is the president now being examined twice a year rather than annually?I’m glad Dr. Barbabella’s overall assessment is that the president is well. A few questions.1. Why did the president have another coronary artery CT? He was last scanned in Oct. We don’t typically scan patients 6 months later unless we are concerned about a finding on the…— Jonathan Reiner (@JReinerMD) May 30, 2026
While MAGA candidate Ken Paxton's win isn't an assured victory for Democrats, he'll at least embroil the GOP in a nightmare of its own making.
Embattled Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner put forward his wife to answer for him after he was outed as having a profile on creepy hookup app Kik — as the Dem candidate himself stays silent.
World Food Program (WFP) Executive Director Cindy McCain pressed the Trump administration for more food aid, saying her organization needs “help.” “When you look at the places you operate, do you think there has been an impact from the dismantling of [the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)]?” CBS News’s Margaret Brennan asked McCain on…
President Donald Trump’s “pursuit of retribution” has led to the ousting of several GOP lawmakers he’d perceived as inefficiently loyal, but in doing so, may very well have doomed his future nominees for the remainder of his term, health care reporter Joseph Choi argued Sunday in an analysis published in The Hill.Earlier this month, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) was defeated in his GOP primary race by his Trump-backed challenger, Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA). Cassidy was among the few Republican lawmakers to vote to convict the president for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, and would go on to call for Trump to drop out of the 2024 race.And, while Trump may have succeeded in helping oust Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican still maintains his position as chair of the influential Senate Health Committee, a position with the power to derail any of Trump's health agency nominees.“The next few months could determine whether [Cassidy’s] legacy is restraining the Trump administration’s more extreme elements or ultimately ushering them in,” Choi wrote.“In the coming months, Cassidy will play a major role in elevating the next round of federal health leaders, presiding over the nominations of former Deputy Surgeon General Erica Schwartz to be the next director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nicole Saphier to be next U.S. surgeon general and whomever the administration picks to replace former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary.”Cassidy ended up being the deciding vote in confirming Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whom he was initially skeptical of but convinced to confirm after receiving assurances that the HHS would adhere to vaccine safety guidelines.Now, with “nothing to lose,” noted Joseph Antos, senior health policy fellow emeritus at the American Enterprise Institute, speaking with The Hill, Cassidy could prove a problem for Trump’s health nominees going forward.