Chaos of America's mad king on full display as British royals visit
Source: Raw Story · Bias: Far Left
Summary
Friends,As much as he’d love to be, Trump is not king of America. Which makes Charles III’s visit here a bit odd. It’s billed as a state visit but Charles isn’t a head of state; his function is purely symbolic.Most Americans disapprove of Trump but there’s something special about the relationship between the Brits and their Royal Family. For it is in fact their royal family – not just an archaic symbol of what remains of the British Empire but a living, breathing, soap-opera of a family that in the minds of many Brits represents modern-day Britain.To those who say it’s bizarre for one of the world’s major democracies of the twenty-first century to cling to the fiction of royalty — and it is indeed a fiction because Charles III has no tangible political power — I say this: It’s a relatively harmless fiction, and one that arguably meets the needs of people to gossip about, project upon, and vicariously live the lives of a storybook family that tries to be of service of their nation.Here in America — at least before Trump — some of us romanticized our presidents and their families. Remember Camelot?But because our presidents also run the executive branch of our government, the two roles – the projected glamor and the political reality – have often gotten confused, leaving us disappointed on both grounds.After Camelot came Lyndon Johnson who pulled up dogs by their ears. And then, eventually, Donald (“Grab ‘em by the p---y. You can do anything”) Trump. You can’t get any further from a romanticized Camelot.Britain’s government may seem drab and boring, but is at least free to do its drab and boring best.Here, we demand that our presidents and their spouses throw formal balls (Trump is trying to build the biggest ballroom anywhere) and state dinners, decorate the White House like a castle, appear in person at every major national anniversary or memorial or funeral, and always symbolize the nation.I’m certainly not suggesting America should have a royal family. Count me in the “No Kings” camp.It’s just that Britain’s infatuation with its own royalty may have some social utility there that we Yanks don’t fully understand. Keeping the trappings of royalty separate from the daily slog of governing makes some sense.Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org
Related Coverage
- When Teen Chaos Meets a Country Afraid to Say No (Right — PJ Media)
- Trump Scores Appeals Court Victory in Battle Over National Park Historical Displays (Right — RedState)
- America 250 Soars With Amazing Flyovers and Aerial Action Over the National Mall (Right — RedState)
- America declared independence in 1776. Yorktown secured it in 1781 (Center Right — Washington Examiner)
- Final preparations for America's 250th anniversary underway (Center — NewsNation)
- America's 250th fireworks party collides with burn-bans (Center Left — Axios)
- Glenn Beck REACTS to foreigners LOVING their visit to America (Right — Blaze Media)
- Why All Patriots Should Watch The Patriot On America’s 250th Birthday (Far Right — The Federalist)
Daily Analysis
Read the full Parallax Pulse for April 28, 2026 — an AI-powered analysis of how Left and Right media covered the biggest stories this day.
More Headlines From April 28, 2026
- Why is Jimmy Kimmel being held to a higher standard than Donald Trump? | Jesse Hassenger (Center Left)
- Fmr. Ambassador on King Charles III's Address to Congress (Center)
- King Charles calls for international cooperation in historic address to Congress (Center)
- Transcript: Trump Press Sec Goes Full Cult in Crazed Tirades at Media (Left)
- King Charles set for historic address to Congress in first US visit as monarch (Right)







