Knicks’ NBA Finals Game 3 report card: Jalen Brunson’s inefficient series finally hurts
Report card from the Knicks’ 115-111 loss over the Spurs in Game 3 of the NBA Finals on Monday night at the Garden.

The internet mocked Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and officials after they dodged a reporter's question during a press conference on Monday, refusing to discuss screwworms.Kennedy and other officials from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education announced that 19 medical schools in the United States had signed the Trump administration’s Nutrition Education Pledge. During the press conference in Washington, D.C., a reporter asked about the flesh-eating parasite outbreak."Thank you, Secretary Kennedy and Under Secretary Kent. You both talked about federal funding for the medical schools. What happens if they don't meet the 48-hour federal funding requirement ... and also, Secretary Kennedy, if you can answer this question. What would the CDC be prepared to do if there is a human case of the new world screwworm?" the reporter asked.The internet noticed Kennedy and the other Trump administration officials were less than thrilled by the question."RFK Jr and his cronies refuse to take a question about screwworm during a press conference," journalist Aaron Rupar, who has more than 1.1 million followers, wrote on X."I mean we know he’s cool with brain worms and dead animals and with screwing so seems natural he’d be cool with screwworms," virologist Dr. Angela Rasmussen, who has more than 501,000 followers, wrote on X."All the attention on the screwworm is making RFK Jr.'s brainworm jealous," progressive account Missing The Point, which has more than 33,000 followers, wrote on Bluesky."Interesting that @SecKennedy didn’t take the opportunity to highlight all the work @US_FDA has been doing on screwworm. Perhaps, as per @SherylNYT reporting, he’s out of the loop and unaware. But he should know. And in case you are curious," Sarah Despres, a public health expert and advocate, wrote on X. Despres also shared updates from the FDA involving its current animal drugs and additional information about the parasitic fly and how public health experts have responded.Interesting that @SecKennedy didn’t take the opportunity to highlight all the work @US_FDA has been doing on screwworm. Perhaps, as per @SherylNYT reporting, he’s out of the loop and unaware. But he should know. And in case you are curious:https://t.co/LQwRPeIHLa https://t.co/ipFpQZmdM9— Sarah Despres (@sarahdespres) June 8, 2026
Report card from the Knicks’ 115-111 loss over the Spurs in Game 3 of the NBA Finals on Monday night at the Garden.
Gregory Bovino, the former Border Patrol commander-at-large who led President Donald Trump's immigration crackdowns in major cities, including Minneapolis, launched a 2028 presidential exploratory committee, positioning himself to challenge Trump's publicly backed Vance-Rubio ticket. Bovino accused Trump of going soft on immigration, stating, "If I were President, I'd lead that [deportation] effort from the front and be on the front lines from time to time," reports The Daily Beast.Bovino's campaign website slogan reads "House Bovino — Men Fight Back," and describes immigrants as "foreign hordes."His candidacy carries significant baggage. Bovino was fired in January after federal agents under his command shot and killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) criticized his appearance Davos, suggesting Bovino "literally went on eBay and purchased SS garb," referring to the long dark coat he wore, reports The Hill. Bovino later attended a far-right "Remigration Summit" in Portugal alongside organizers invoking Weimar Republic mass deportation models. The Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin dismissed Bovino as irrelevant. Watch the video below. Your browser does not support the video tag.
President Donald Trump told reporters he had a meeting locked in with the biggest names in artificial intelligence to discuss the government taking ownership stakes in their companies. There was just one problem — nobody had told the companies.Leading AI companies were "blindsided" by Trump's announcement Friday that he planned to meet with "all the big" firms about taking "pieces" of their companies, "possibly as soon as next week," three sources told NOTUS."I actually have a meeting scheduled in the very short, in the very near future, with — did you know that? — all of the companies," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. "And we're talking about it, where the American people can benefit from the success of AI."The executives learned about the meeting from the president's public comments, not from the White House, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity. As of Monday afternoon, the administration had provided no details on timing or location.Trump framed the idea in populist terms. "There's something very interesting about it, where it almost becomes a partnership with the American public," he said. "It would be a beautiful thing."But the proposal — which would rank among the most consequential federal interventions in the private sector in modern history — has drawn sharp pushback, including from within Trump's own party.When Trump took a 10% stake in Intel in August 2025, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) fired back on X: "If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn't the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism? Terrible idea."Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) told CBS: "For so many of my self-described true conservatives, you're going to have to explain to me how this reconciles with true conservatism and true free-market capitalism. I don't see it."Even Trump's former AI czar, David Sacks, pushed back against the idea. "Nationalization of AI will accelerate the corporate-government fusion we're already sliding toward," Sacks wrote on X. "America won't win the AI race if we beat China but end up with a CCP-style social credit system in the U.S."OpenAI CEO Sam Altman first pitched the idea of giving Trump shares in his company in early 2025, NOTUS reported. But Anthropic — now the world's most valuable AI company at a $965 billion valuation — had not yet discussed the concept as of last week, according to a fourth source. Spokespeople for OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX, and Google all declined to comment.
NBC News’ chief data analyst Steve Kornacki will answer NBC News subscriber questions about the midterm elections and more in a live Q&A on Tuesday at 12 p.m. ET.
Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt remains optimistic about his chances in the Los Angeles mayoral race despite losing his 40,000-vote lead and second-place position to far-left L.A. City Councilwoman Nithya Raman.Critics of California’s delayed vote-counting are raising concerns that the primary election may have been stolen from Pratt, as the process has already dragged on for nearly a week.'Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of "late mail-in ballots" compared to both Bass and Pratt.'Pratt’s nearly 10-point advantage over Raman on Election Day slowly shrank in the days following, with Raman eventually taking the lead. As of Monday, Raman is up 3,000 votes, according to the Associated Press.“Folks, we’re dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there’s still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let’s git-r-dun!” Pratt wrote in a post on social media on Monday.President Donald Trump chimed in on the latest ballot results, calling it “not possible” for Pratt to have lost to Raman “after the big lead he had.”“3rd World Nation. Rigged Elections!” Trump wrote. “Won’t have results for, possibly, TWO WEEKS, according to officials.”RELATED: Spencer Pratt’s 40,000-vote lead vanishes in Los Angeles mayor race as California continues counting ballots Nithya Raman. Justin Sullivan/Getty ImagesPolitical commentator Benny Johnson stated that the recent ballot drops heavily favoring Raman were “statistically impossible.”Conservative activist Robby Starbuck noted that Raman, a third-place candidate, “suddenly” began winning “1st in every new ballot drop.” He shared a graph showing incumbent Karen Bass gaining roughly the same percentage of votes with each new ballot drop while Raman surged. Journalist Nick Sortor declared the election “absolutely RIGGED” and called for authorities to open an investigation.“Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of ‘late mail-in ballots’ compared to both Bass and Pratt,” Sortor wrote.RELATED: ‘BIG cheating’: Trump drops bombshell on California for vote-counting delays Spencer Pratt. Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times/Getty ImagesTrump announced last week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles was investigating California’s vote-counting delay. On Sunday, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli stated that California allows residents to register to vote using gym membership cards, employee ID cards, credit and debit cards, insurance cards, and prescription drug labels.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A 205-page House report alleges Keith Ellison and Tim Walz knew about Minnesota's massive fraud schemes years earlier than they publicly claimed.
Trump picks FHFA Director Bill Pulte as acting intelligence chief, drawing criticism from lawmakers who say he lacks national security experience.
Two Supreme Court justices stepped away from two cases on Monday, as Newsweek reported. Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito decided to sit out federal appeals cases involving firearm convictions and pension payments, though it isn't entirely clear why.The federal recusal statute (28 U.S. Code § 455) demands that federal judges and top justices must recuse themselves if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned or if their spouse has a financial or other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of a proceeding. Over the past several years, there have been several questions about cases the public and judicial critics believe justice should have recused themselves from.Both appellate rulings were affirmed by the high court. It means the lower-court decisions were upheld in full. The case that Barrett recused herself from came from the Seventh Circuit over an inmate named Eural Black. The case Alito recused himself from was a Fourth Circuit Court case about retirement benefits between employees and the companies DuPont and Corteva.In Black's case, the lower court ruled that he was serving a longer sentence because of a "stacked" firearms conviction. Under the First Step Act his sentence should be reduced. "Black argued that the gap between his sentence and what he would receive today should qualify as an 'extraordinary and compelling' reason for early release," said Newsweek. The lower court decided that its own precedent still barred "using those sentencing reforms as a basis for compassionate release, even after a new policy from the U.S. Sentencing Commission suggested otherwise."In the case Alito recused himself from, the Fourth Circuit sided with corporations. Plaintiff David Gasper sued, alleging that his monthly retirement benefits were reduced after his divorce. The corporation said that it spread the costs of survivor benefits across the total pension, which the court said was valid. The lower court also found that Gasper's claim for penalties "over delayed document disclosures," but there was no evidence of bad faith or harm.